<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schrodinger&#8217;s Tat [Science Tattoo]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elinor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-37440</link>
		<dc:creator>Elinor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-37440</guid>
		<description>I like the concept, not sure on the style but only because it wouldn&#039;t suit me.

Contemplating something similar, maybe more like this one:
http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/x0/x1375.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept, not sure on the style but only because it wouldn&#8217;t suit me.</p>
<p>Contemplating something similar, maybe more like this one:<br />
<a href="http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/x0/x1375.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/x0/x1375.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeeelz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-29145</link>
		<dc:creator>skeeelz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-29145</guid>
		<description>I agree with Samantha (no. 1) -- best one yet. &quot;tattoos&quot; (no. 10) is WAY off. Has tons of style, beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Samantha (no. 1) &#8212; best one yet. &#8220;tattoos&#8221; (no. 10) is WAY off. Has tons of style, beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-26205</link>
		<dc:creator>A. C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-26205</guid>
		<description>It would be more fun if it were a temporary tattoo which appears somedays on the right and somedays on the left arm.  That way people can wonder which universe they&#039;re in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be more fun if it were a temporary tattoo which appears somedays on the right and somedays on the left arm.  That way people can wonder which universe they&#8217;re in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tattoos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-26075</link>
		<dc:creator>tattoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-26075</guid>
		<description>ok, I admit, the explanation is cool. I have also read the wikipedia page you link to. However, the tattoo sucks. No offence. It is ugly, how deep and clever its meaning may be, it has no style, no beauty at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, I admit, the explanation is cool. I have also read the wikipedia page you link to. However, the tattoo sucks. No offence. It is ugly, how deep and clever its meaning may be, it has no style, no beauty at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25357</link>
		<dc:creator>S Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25357</guid>
		<description>Here is another twist you can add to your explanation. A self-fornicating cat. Is it gay or not? It&#039;s not certain, nor is it&#039;s gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another twist you can add to your explanation. A self-fornicating cat. Is it gay or not? It&#8217;s not certain, nor is it&#8217;s gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nalm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25189</link>
		<dc:creator>Nalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25189</guid>
		<description>The badness of the cattoo is an insufficient means by which to measure the amount of alcohol ingested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The badness of the cattoo is an insufficient means by which to measure the amount of alcohol ingested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire C Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25115</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire C Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25115</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be good if we could get tattoos that only collapsed when others looked at them? Schroedinger&#039;s Tattoo.

I don&#039;t like tattoos at all, but this could be the next step to a halfway tattoo idea (unless you use those non permanent ones). Can&#039;t add any comment pic with this comment to aid my idea here, but will try next time! Lol! 

Claire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be good if we could get tattoos that only collapsed when others looked at them? Schroedinger&#8217;s Tattoo.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like tattoos at all, but this could be the next step to a halfway tattoo idea (unless you use those non permanent ones). Can&#8217;t add any comment pic with this comment to aid my idea here, but will try next time! Lol! </p>
<p>Claire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARJ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25094</link>
		<dc:creator>ARJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25094</guid>
		<description>How much tequila had Berg downed before choosing this cattoo???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much tequila had Berg downed before choosing this cattoo???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25085</link>
		<dc:creator>ELN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25085</guid>
		<description>LOL@Vitelli

Um, like Occam, even as a Schroedinger fan I wouldn&#039;t have gone there. Would&#039;ve gone right to the fornicating. Unless at a physics conference, perhaps. 

But then physicists have strange sense of humor and would probably have just made two cats fornicating, which they&#039;d explain as Schroedinger&#039;s cat, then giggled secretly about as they got others to believe their cats fornicating was a symbol of their genius. And it would be, but only for getting people to think two cats fornicating is the best thing ever.

At least that&#039;s how I would play it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL@Vitelli</p>
<p>Um, like Occam, even as a Schroedinger fan I wouldn&#8217;t have gone there. Would&#8217;ve gone right to the fornicating. Unless at a physics conference, perhaps. </p>
<p>But then physicists have strange sense of humor and would probably have just made two cats fornicating, which they&#8217;d explain as Schroedinger&#8217;s cat, then giggled secretly about as they got others to believe their cats fornicating was a symbol of their genius. And it would be, but only for getting people to think two cats fornicating is the best thing ever.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s how I would play it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo Vitelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25060</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo Vitelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25060</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Schrodiner&#039;s&lt;i&gt; tat.  You don&#039;t know what those cats are doing with any certainty until you ask the wearer about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s <i>Schrodiner&#8217;s</i><i> tat.  You don&#8217;t know what those cats are doing with any certainty until you ask the wearer about it.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grasshoppa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25043</link>
		<dc:creator>grasshoppa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25043</guid>
		<description>No doubt though the tattoo artist was thinking along... &#039;hmmm, 2 cats fornicating...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt though the tattoo artist was thinking along&#8230; &#8216;hmmm, 2 cats fornicating&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25022</link>
		<dc:creator>Camo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 07:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25022</guid>
		<description>It DOES kind of look like the one cat is mounting the other cat against its will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It DOES kind of look like the one cat is mounting the other cat against its will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-25008</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/09/05/schrodingers-tat-science-tattoo/#comment-25008</guid>
		<description>Best one yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best one yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 16:36:07 -->
