<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ExtInked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/12/03/extinked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/12/03/extinked/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oroboros</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/12/03/extinked/#comment-12940</link>
		<dc:creator>Oroboros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2064#comment-12940</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.uhc.org.uk/website/images/uploads/p54_/p54_f_1259773882.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is beautiful&lt;/A&gt; but I wonder how well it will age. The more detail one puts in a small area, the greater the tendency to smearing and distorting over time. The biggest, simplest designs last the longest. Generally most tattoos require a touch-up or two, but the more detailed ones like this probably need more.

So I expect the wing structure to probably endure better toward the edges, but the subtler shading on the back and head may not look as good in 10 years without a touch-up.

Although &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/getting_a_tattoo.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this guide is ostensibly written for girls thinking about a tattoo&lt;/A&gt;, all of the advice looks practical and grounded in medical science on first glance. In particular, their admonition that &quot;bigger is better&quot; with tattoos is really true when you consider the effects of aging and the skin stretching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.uhc.org.uk/website/images/uploads/p54_/p54_f_1259773882.jpg" rel="nofollow">This is beautiful</a> but I wonder how well it will age. The more detail one puts in a small area, the greater the tendency to smearing and distorting over time. The biggest, simplest designs last the longest. Generally most tattoos require a touch-up or two, but the more detailed ones like this probably need more.</p>
<p>So I expect the wing structure to probably endure better toward the edges, but the subtler shading on the back and head may not look as good in 10 years without a touch-up.</p>
<p>Although <a HREF="http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/getting_a_tattoo.htm" rel="nofollow">this guide is ostensibly written for girls thinking about a tattoo</a>, all of the advice looks practical and grounded in medical science on first glance. In particular, their admonition that &#8220;bigger is better&#8221; with tattoos is really true when you consider the effects of aging and the skin stretching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
