<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaving Our Geological Mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-28925</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2353#comment-28925</guid>
		<description>Let them eat &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/climate/2010/1001/full/climate.2010.130.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lobster&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let them eat <a href="http://www.nature.com/climate/2010/1001/full/climate.2010.130.html" rel="nofollow">lobster</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-28904</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2353#comment-28904</guid>
		<description>No chance of aquatic life being to adapt to the lower pH, eh?

&lt;strong&gt;[CZ: That&#039;s a good question, actually. There are some studies on organisms that live in naturally low-pH habitats, and they show adaptations to the environment not seen elsewhere. But it&#039;s not clear that other species could adapt in a matter of decades to the current change in pH in the ocean, which is the timescale that matters for survival. And the fossil record indicates some big extinctions in connection with ocean acidity, so that doesn&#039;t bode well either.]&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No chance of aquatic life being to adapt to the lower pH, eh?</p>
<p><strong>[CZ: That's a good question, actually. There are some studies on organisms that live in naturally low-pH habitats, and they show adaptations to the environment not seen elsewhere. But it's not clear that other species could adapt in a matter of decades to the current change in pH in the ocean, which is the timescale that matters for survival. And the fossil record indicates some big extinctions in connection with ocean acidity, so that doesn't bode well either.]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-28903</link>
		<dc:creator>ERD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2353#comment-28903</guid>
		<description>Just a small point. Decreasing pH is not equivalent to increasing acidity. Acidity is typically defined as negative alkalinity. CO2 absorption into the ocean does not change alkalinity. It does, in fact, lower pH (with profound consequences), but acidification viz a viz CO2 is a misnomer.

&lt;strong&gt;[CZ: Fair enough, but bear in mind that all the papers on this topic use the phrase &quot;ocean acidification.&quot;]&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small point. Decreasing pH is not equivalent to increasing acidity. Acidity is typically defined as negative alkalinity. CO2 absorption into the ocean does not change alkalinity. It does, in fact, lower pH (with profound consequences), but acidification viz a viz CO2 is a misnomer.</p>
<p><strong>[CZ: Fair enough, but bear in mind that all the papers on this topic use the phrase "ocean acidification."]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-28900</link>
		<dc:creator>khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2353#comment-28900</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of a phrase: &quot;Crapping in your own nest.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of a phrase: &#8220;Crapping in your own nest.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for February 16th from 02:09 to 06:52 &#8212; arghh.net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/02/15/leaving-our-geological-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-28899</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for February 16th from 02:09 to 06:52 &#8212; arghh.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=2353#comment-28899</guid>
		<description>[...] Leaving Our Geological Mark &#124; The Loom &#124; Discover Magazine &#8211; What mark will we leave on the Earth that will survive millions of years? It may be ocean acidification. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leaving Our Geological Mark | The Loom | Discover Magazine &#8211; What mark will we leave on the Earth that will survive millions of years? It may be ocean acidification. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:13:28 -->
