DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
The Loom
« Virtual Book Party on Thursday–Win A Free Copy of The Tangled Bank
Webinar Follow-Up: Dinosaur Polls and More »

Shape-Shifting Across The Globe

Many animals have evolved camouflage, but nobody quite pulls it off as beautifully as the octopus and its tentacled cousin the cuttlefish. These invertebrates, which belong to a group called cephalopods, are covered in microscopic pigment organs that they can squeeze and stretch to take on the patterns around them. They can curl their tentacles to assume different shapes, and they can even change the texture of their skin to bumpy or smooth, as necessity demands.

Nobody knows the tricks of cephalopods better than Roger Hanlon, a biologist at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. As I wrote in this New York Times profile of Hanlon, he has documented their powers of disguise both in the wild and in his lab. You can see some of the cephalopods in action in this Times video I narrated, as well as in these videos at Hanlon’s web site. Hanlon has carefully documented how cephalopods can melt away into their backgrounds; he’s also shown that male cuttlefishes can disguise themselves as females to sneak past bigger males to get a chance to mate. There’s still a lot Hanlon has yet to study about cephalopod camouflage, though; many of the most spectacular displays of shape-shifting are one-offs that Hanlon or a wildlife videographer happened to catch on a few seconds of video.

The video shown here is the latest addition to the repertoire of cepahlopod camouflage. As Hanlon and his colleagues write in a paper to be published in Biological Bulletin, the Atlantic longarm octopus (Macrotritopus defilippi) does an uncanny impression of a flounder.

Hanlon first saw this trick before he actually knew what it was. In the early 1980s, he captured a young Atlantic longarm octopus and reared it in a tank at Texas A&M University. It was the first time anyone had ever paid close attention to the biology of this obscure creature, which lives on sandy expanses of the Caribbean sea floor. While observing the octopus, Hanlon noticed that sometimes it would flatten out its tentacles and swim close to the bottom of the tank. At the time he didn’t know what to make of it.

In 2000 wildlife photographers took pictures of Atlantic shortarm octopuses in their natural habitat and suggested that they took on the strange shape to mimic flounders. Four years later, Hanlon took another picture that showed the octopus not just flat against the sea floor, but assuming the pattern of the surrounding sand–a trick that flounder use as well. The next year Hanlon and his colleagues spent 51 hours diving of the coast of the island of Saba searching for the octopuses on the sand plains. They managed to film one animal apparently pretending to be a flounder. And since then, professional photographers have supplied Hanlon with still more videos.

Hanlon and his colleagues have compared the footage of the octopus to footage of the peacock flounder, which lives in the same waters. The similarities are uncanny. Flounders hug the sandy bottom as they swim, even following the sand’s ripples. So do octopuses. The octopuses swim in the same short bouts as the flounder, and at about the same speed. They form their tentacles into a sheet-like mass with the same body outline as the flounder. The big difference between the octopus and the flounder is the way they blend into the background. The flounder are relatively slow at matching their surroundings, while the octopuses can change their skin quickly and with great precision. If there are white rocks scattered around on the sandy plain, Hanlon has noticed, a stationary octopus will produce a white spot on its body as well.

The Atlantic longarm octopus is not the only octopus to pretend to be a flounder. On the other side of the world, off the coast of Indonesia, Hanlon and his colleagues have documented two other species that pull off the same trick. (Here’s a video of one of the Indonesian species.) Pretending to be a flounder is such a useful strategy that three distantly related species of octopus have independently evolved it.

With flounder-mimicking octopuses now firmly established in the Atlantic Ocean as well as the Pacific, it’s high time to ask what is so great about flounders? Sandy plains are dangerous places for soft-bodied octopuses. Predators can spot them as they move across the open expanses. It’s possible that octopuses are not mimicking flounders per se, but are just taking advantage of the same kind of camouflage. But it’s also possible that small fish that do spot the octopus may leave it alone because it looks like a flounder. While a small fish could easily take a bite out of a soft, fleshy octopus tentacle, a tough, scaly flounder would pose a threat.

Share

February 24th, 2010 1:35 AM by Carl Zimmer in Brains, Evolution, Writing Elsewhere | 5 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

5 Responses to “Shape-Shifting Across The Globe”

  1. 1.   neil Says:
    February 24th, 2010 at 2:00 am

    I’ve wondered what the adaptive value of flatfish mimicry is for Thaumoctopus before and considered that it might just be convergent cryptic behavior. It seemed hard to thing of a predator that would go after a large octopus but avoid a flatfish.

    Not knowing anything about their social structure, I wonder if they might be trying to evade the notice of con-specifics to avoid territorial aggression or unwanted sexual advances? Hadn’t considered the “small fish” angle before, however, that’s an interesting suggestion.

  2. 2.   Roy Caldwell Says:
    February 25th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    There are several octopuses that live on open sandy bottoms that move in a similar manner. Thaumoctopus and the long-armed Atlantic species are just two examples. Keeping low, pressed against the substrate to avoid detection certainly may be one reason, but we should also consider the hydrodynamic advantages of such movement as another convergent force shaping both flat fish and octopuses.

  3. 3.   Doug Watts Says:
    February 25th, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    Neil — The answer to your question might be that flounder are bony and octopi are not. We fish for fluke (summer flounder) on the south side of Cape Cod and they are big: the local expression is “doormats.” But they have a fully rigid, bony skeleton. An 18″ long fluke is about 12 inches wide. The biggest predators are large striped bass and bluefish, which would have a very hard time getting a good-sized flounder in their mouth. In contrast, because squid and octopi are soft-bodied, they are an easy bite for bigger predators, even if they are big. But if a squid or octopus makes itself look just like a fluke, esp. a doormat, larger predators like stripers and blues or tuna will more likely move along in search of easier to swallow prey.

    The use of sharp, stiff bone structure to deter predation is well established in fish like bullheads (hornpout), yellow perch and the sunfish/black bass family. Make yourself hard and painful to swallow.

    In this sense the octopi imitation of flounder might be like viceroy butterflies mimicking monarchs.

  4. 4.   JMW Says:
    February 26th, 2010 at 4:01 am

    I’ve been fascinated by octopi for a while, and I remember seeing footage of an octopus camouflaging itself. It was in an area of flat sandy seabottom dotted with black plants that had curving leaves. The octopus turned itself black and arranged its tentacles in the exact same shape as the plant’s leaves, and swayed with the current in the same way. Even to human eyes, it was almost indistinguishable from the plant.

    Cool animals.

  5. 5.   SkepticalRationalist Says:
    March 4th, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    I suspect Roy is correct…I think this is less an instance of flounder mimicry and more an instance of Sand Mimicry producing convergent solutions. Moving along the seafloor in such a way as to quickly camouflage oneself has certain requirements.

Leave a Reply





    • About The Loom

      "Celebrated curiosity monger"

      --Brain Pickings

      Carl Zimmer writes about science regularly for the New York Times and magazines such as Discover, where he is a contributing editor and columnist.

      He is the author of twelve books, the most recent of which is Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed. His website is carlzimmer.com and his address is blog at carlzimmer dot com .




    • Google Profile


    • Facebook

    • RSS Recent Posts

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe
    • Science Tattoo Emporium

      I once wondered aloud if scientists had tattoos of their science. The answer was yes, and this ever-growing collection is the evidence. I've turned them into a book about art and science called Science Ink: Tattoos of Science Obsessed.


    • Loom Junior

      My Tumblr home for scattershot
    • Books

      Carl Zimmer is the author of twelve books and counting.



      "Beautiful. Packed with fascinating stories"-Nature
      Order a copy




      "Fascinating and enlightening"--The Guardian
      Available in paperback, hardback or Kindle



      “Carl Zimmer takes us behind the scenes in our own heads. He has ferreted out all the most wondrous, bizarre stories and studies and served them up in this delicious, sizzling, easy-to-digest platter of neuro-goodness.” —Mary Roach, author of Packing for Mars and Stiff
      An ebook exclusive: Amazon, Barnes and Noble, carlzimmer.com




      New! More Brain Cuttings:
      Further Explorations of the Mind
      Order from Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Apple



      The Tangled Bank: An Introduction to Evolution

      "The Tangled Bank is the best written and best illustrated introduction to evolution of the Darwin centennial decade, and also the most conversant with ongoing research."--Edward O. Wilson, Harvard University
      Order a copy



      Microcosm: E. coli and The New Science of Life

      "Superb...quietly revolutionary"--Boston Globe
      Order a copy



      Soul Made Flesh: The Discovery of the Brain and How It Changed the World

      "Fascinating...thrilling... Zimmer has produced a top-notch work of popular science."--Los Angeles Times
      Order a copy



      Evolution: The Triumph of An Idea

      "As thorough as it is graceful...This is as fine a book as one will find on the subject."--Scientific American
      Order a copy



      Parasite Rex

      "A book capable of changing how we see the world."--The Los Angeles Times
      Reissued with a new epilogue by the author.
      Order a copy



      At the Water's Edge: Fish With Fingers, Whales With Legs, and How Life Came Ashore But Then Went Back to The Sea

      "A fascinating story, which Zimmer unfolds as a tale of high-stakes scientific sleuthing."--Booklist
      Order a copy

    • Twitter Updates

        follow me on Twitter
      • Comment Policy

        Light but firm. Details here.
      • Recent comments

        • mo on In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
        • megan130 on In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
        • Pascale on In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • Categories

      • Blogroll

        • A Blog Around the Clock
        • Aetiology
        • Babel’s Dawn
        • Bad Science
        • Creature Cast
        • Culture Dish (Rebecca Skloot)
        • Dan Ariely
        • David Dobbs
        • dechronization
        • Developing Intelligence
        • Evolution & Medicine Review
        • Gene Expression
        • Genome Boy
        • Genomicron (Ryan Gregory)
        • io9
        • john hawks
        • John Rennie
        • Jonah Lehrer
        • Knight Science Journalism Tracker
        • Laelaps (Brian Switek)
        • Language Log
        • Mind Hacks
        • Mind Matters (David Berreby)
        • Mixing Memory
        • Mystery Rays From Outer Space
        • Nobel Intent
        • Not Exactly Rocket Science
        • Oscillator
        • Pharyngula
        • Prerogative of Harlots
        • RealClimate
        • Robert Krulwich
        • Sandwalk
        • Science Cheerleader
        • Science Made Cool
        • Skeptical Science
        • Small Things Considered
        • Speakeasy Science (Deborah Blum)
        • Steve Silberman
        • Steven Johnson’s blog
        • Superbug
        • synthesis
        • Tetrapod Zoology
        • The Intersection
        • The Inverse Square Blog
        • The Last Word On Nothing
        • The Panda's Thumb
        • The Tree of Life
        • This Week in Evolution
        • Why Evolution Is True
        • Word Routes (Ben Zimmer)
        • Zooillogix
      • My stuff

        • CarlZimmer.com
        • Facebook
        • microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life
        • My article archive
      • Archives

      • Nifty Fifty

      • Why “The Loom”?

        "...among the joyous, heartless, ever-juvenile eternities, Pip saw the multitudinous, God-omnipresent, coral insects, that out of the firmament of waters, heaved the colossal orbs. He saw God's foot upon the treadle of the loom, and spoke it; and therefore his shipmates called him mad." --Moby Dick


    • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

      Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

      Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us