"Celebrated curiosity monger"
--Brain Pickings
Carl Zimmer writes about science regularly for the New York Times and magazines such as Discover, where he is a contributing editor and columnist.
He is the author of twelve books, the most recent of which is Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed. His website is carlzimmer.com and his address is blog at carlzimmer dot com .
Carl Zimmer is the author of
twelve books and counting.
"Beautiful. Packed with fascinating stories"-Nature
Order a copy
"Whether discussing the common cold and flu, little-known viruses that attack bacteria or protect oceans, or the world’s viral future as seen through our encounters with HIV or SARS, Zimmer’s writing is lively, knowledgeable, and graced with poetic touches.”—Rebecca Skloot, author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
Available in hardback or Kindle
“Carl Zimmer takes us behind the scenes in our own heads. He has ferreted out all the most wondrous, bizarre stories and studies and served them up in this delicious, sizzling, easy-to-digest platter of neuro-goodness.” —Mary Roach, author of Packing for Mars and Stiff
An ebook exclusive: Amazon, Barnes and Noble, carlzimmer.com
New! More Brain Cuttings:
Further Explorations of the Mind
Order from Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Apple
"The Tangled Bank is the best written and best illustrated introduction to evolution of the Darwin centennial decade, and also the most conversant with ongoing research."--Edward O. Wilson, Harvard University
Order a copy
"Superb...quietly revolutionary"--Boston Globe
Order a copy
"Fascinating...thrilling... Zimmer has produced a top-notch work of popular science."--Los Angeles Times
Order a copy
"As thorough as it is graceful...This is as fine a book as one will find on the subject."--Scientific American
Order a copy
"A book capable of changing how we see the world."--The Los Angeles Times
Reissued with a new epilogue by the author.
Order a copy
"A fascinating story, which Zimmer unfolds as a tale of high-stakes scientific sleuthing."--Booklist
Order a copy
"...among the joyous, heartless, ever-juvenile eternities, Pip saw the multitudinous, God-omnipresent, coral insects, that out of the firmament of waters, heaved the colossal orbs. He saw God's foot upon the treadle of the loom, and spoke it; and therefore his shipmates called him mad." --Moby Dick
June 30th, 2010 at 9:13 am
Brilliant!!
June 30th, 2010 at 9:38 am
It’s not a ratite? Damn!
June 30th, 2010 at 9:38 am
When I was little and watching Sesame Street I told my mom that Big Bird was cross between an ostrich and a Pelican.
The ostrich is understandable, the Pelican I can only attribute to the fact that we had one that hung around our boat and I had named it Big Bird.
I don’t remember telling her this. But its a famous family story.
June 30th, 2010 at 9:52 am
Wonderful!!!
June 30th, 2010 at 1:24 pm
OMG AWESOME! That was probably one of the best talks I’ve seen this year.
Now the follow up talk should be on the mysterious large mammal that has a relationship with this large flightless crane and whether or not it is a long tailed proboscidean or a trunked xenarthrian!
June 30th, 2010 at 1:52 pm
Damn! And I thought it might turn out to be a feathered non-avian dinosaur…
June 30th, 2010 at 8:15 pm
I can but agree with some luminaries here: Great fun.
June 30th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
I’m out of time to watch the video (sorry), but a moa surely?
(I’m biased: moas, like me, are from New Zealand. Or rather were. I don’t think I’ve gone extinct.)
July 1st, 2010 at 1:56 am
He had me at “tibiotarsus”
July 1st, 2010 at 9:40 am
Grant: moas have highly HIGHLY reduced forelimbs. Grandicrocavis, on the other hand (so to speak) does not.
July 1st, 2010 at 11:46 am
I would have thought it was a highly modified therizinosaur. Smaller claws, more feathers (possibly), and reduced dentitition. Then the fingers, neck, gut and posture would match and all you would need to do is make the tail extremely vestigial.
Big “Bird”, obviously, is a modern colloquial taxonomic identification.
July 3rd, 2010 at 1:15 am
The number of people who have tried to convince me that Grandicrocavis is non-avian… Last I looked, it wasn’t the Mesozoic any more, guys. What’s more plausible: last surviving non-avian dinosaur, OR, it’s a bird? See, this is why we need DNA.
And Snuffleupagus is surely a dwarf island mammoth. But I’ll leave that debate to the mammalogists.
July 7th, 2010 at 10:25 am
[...] Comedy video of the month. [...]
July 14th, 2010 at 1:20 am
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I
have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.
funny pictures
July 16th, 2010 at 10:23 am
Awesome!!!! Love all your comments as well! Thanks to Anisa for the link to that site, it’s hilarious!!!
September 2nd, 2010 at 5:42 pm
[...] If you have a few minutes and would like to listen to a thoughtful yet somewhat irreverent discussion on the nature and discovery of a certain flightless bird, you could do worse than zoologist Mike Dickison. Check it out here. [...]
November 23rd, 2011 at 7:50 am
Sorry, but he admits he did not have an actual skeleton, and he only hypothesized the skeletal morphology. Looking at the actual observations he in fact gave, we can see that the much reduced tarsometatarsus is more consistent in what we see in Therizinosaurs, than what we see in the family Gruidae with their greatly increased tarsometatarsal region. Also, the extremely large gut is more in line with a more herbivorous animal that utilizes a large bacterial fermenting for cellulose breakdown. Again, this is more consistent with Therizinosaurs.