<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Edge Question 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/01/15/the-edge-question-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/01/15/the-edge-question-2011/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/01/15/the-edge-question-2011/#comment-15560</link>
		<dc:creator>johnk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=3923#comment-15560</guid>
		<description>I always enjoy the annual Edge questions.

Some of the ones I liked this year (in addition to Carl&#039;s):

Mathew Ridley — collective intelligence
Daniel Dennett — cycles
Marcel Kinsbourne The expanding in-group
Andy Clark — Predictive Coding
Mark Henderson — sciences methods aren&#039;t just for science
Karyn Schultz — The pessimistic meta-induction from the history of science
Bart Kosko — Q.E.D. moments
Sue Blackmore — correlation is not a cause
W. Tecumsem Fitch — an instinct to learn
Fiery Cushman — confabulation
Diane Halpern — A statistically significant difference ...

This year there are a lot of Neuroscientists and psychologists on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always enjoy the annual Edge questions.</p>
<p>Some of the ones I liked this year (in addition to Carl&#8217;s):</p>
<p>Mathew Ridley — collective intelligence<br />
Daniel Dennett — cycles<br />
Marcel Kinsbourne The expanding in-group<br />
Andy Clark — Predictive Coding<br />
Mark Henderson — sciences methods aren&#8217;t just for science<br />
Karyn Schultz — The pessimistic meta-induction from the history of science<br />
Bart Kosko — Q.E.D. moments<br />
Sue Blackmore — correlation is not a cause<br />
W. Tecumsem Fitch — an instinct to learn<br />
Fiery Cushman — confabulation<br />
Diane Halpern — A statistically significant difference &#8230;</p>
<p>This year there are a lot of Neuroscientists and psychologists on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
