[CZ: Renee, please check my comment policy. I actually do monitor my comments, but not in order to ban creationists. When people present scientific errors in the comment thread, Loom readers regularly do a great job of explaining why they're wrong. Here's an example. I find this kind of exchange more useful than deleting comments.]

http://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/12/05/autism-outline/autism-outline.pdf

“Will some of these Neanderthal fragments be found to be important in cognition, language ability, and other higher brain functions? To find out, it will be necessary to understand the human epigenome and transcriptome in detail, so that we can determine the true impact of both structural and regulatory genes on the development and function of the brain.”

Not so encouraging to see people still rejecting accepted science:

@ prentice:

evilution

Evolution is working and accepted, which is why Pääbo works on it. And we don’t see any alternatives that works!

Evilutionists tell us once you die, then that’s it, there is nothing else for you.

That is, famously, not a prediction out of biology but physics. Thermodynamics tells you a dead body has stopped metabolizing. Blame Carnot.

And keep your sciences apart. Creationism rejects all of them, but physics most of all.

@ Andrea D. Merciless:

another RACE of man

Race is a concept of artificial selection (dogs et cetera) and ethnicity, not biology. They see demes and subspecies AFAIU.

is evolution even possible without the reality of race?

Certainly you don’t have to have more than one ‘deme’ at any specific time that continually evolves.

An example over space instead of time would be ring species where demes are spatially dispersed and linked along a cline. You’ll note that after a sufficient distance along a cline (or time), speciation occurs despite there is only one deme present locally.

So this contradiction with observation fells your proposal. Racism has no biological basis.