When the first fossils of Neanderthals came to light 155 years ago, they raised a tough question: did they come from a member of our own species, or a separate one?
For all the progress scientists have made in studying Neanderthals since then, the answer remains tough–in part because it’s not that easy to define a species.
You are equating “human” with “Homo sapiens”. This seems to me a strange and very recent trend.
Neandertals (Neandertal Man!!) have always been considered human. Archaic humans, primitive humans, ancient humans, but humans.
The robust brow ridge of archaic human species simply continues to be one of mysteries of evolution. One of my physical anthropology professors jokingly answered that question with “Don’t ask!” Nobody really knows, and there are very few (and very weakly supported) hypotheses.
Brow ridges might have served the purpose of protecting the eyes, or of shielding them from the sun or sweat–in which case the mystery is really why anatomically modern Homo sapiens don’t have them. If I had to speculate, I’d say it’s just another one of our neotenous features.
Is there a function to the brow enlargement? If so, what?
You are equating “human” with “Homo sapiens”. This seems to me a strange and very recent trend.
Neandertals (Neandertal Man!!) have always been considered human. Archaic humans, primitive humans, ancient humans, but humans.
Yes, there have been many human species.
Completely agree with Paleofreak comment
@#1 John Kubie:
The robust brow ridge of archaic human species simply continues to be one of mysteries of evolution. One of my physical anthropology professors jokingly answered that question with “Don’t ask!” Nobody really knows, and there are very few (and very weakly supported) hypotheses.
Brow ridges might have served the purpose of protecting the eyes, or of shielding them from the sun or sweat–in which case the mystery is really why anatomically modern Homo sapiens don’t have them. If I had to speculate, I’d say it’s just another one of our neotenous features.