<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irish cannibals and Neanderthal sex: Just how big is our species?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/#comment-18968</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6303#comment-18968</guid>
		<description>@#1 John Kubie:

The robust brow ridge of archaic human species simply continues to be one of mysteries of evolution. One of my physical anthropology professors jokingly answered that question with &quot;Don&#039;t ask!&quot; Nobody really knows, and there are very few (and very weakly supported) hypotheses.

Brow ridges might have served the purpose of protecting the eyes, or of shielding them from the sun or sweat--in which case the mystery is really why anatomically modern Homo sapiens don&#039;t have them. If I had to speculate, I&#039;d say it&#039;s just another one of our neotenous features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#1 John Kubie:</p>
<p>The robust brow ridge of archaic human species simply continues to be one of mysteries of evolution. One of my physical anthropology professors jokingly answered that question with &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask!&#8221; Nobody really knows, and there are very few (and very weakly supported) hypotheses.</p>
<p>Brow ridges might have served the purpose of protecting the eyes, or of shielding them from the sun or sweat&#8211;in which case the mystery is really why anatomically modern Homo sapiens don&#8217;t have them. If I had to speculate, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s just another one of our neotenous features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millan Mozota</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/#comment-18967</link>
		<dc:creator>Millan Mozota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6303#comment-18967</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with Paleofreak comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with Paleofreak comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/#comment-18966</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6303#comment-18966</guid>
		<description>Yes, there have been many human species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there have been many human species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El PaleoFreak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/#comment-18965</link>
		<dc:creator>El PaleoFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6303#comment-18965</guid>
		<description>You are equating &quot;human&quot; with &quot;Homo sapiens&quot;. This seems to me a strange and very recent trend.
Neandertals (Neandertal Man!!) have always been considered human. Archaic humans, primitive humans, ancient humans, but humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are equating &#8220;human&#8221; with &#8220;Homo sapiens&#8221;. This seems to me a strange and very recent trend.<br />
Neandertals (Neandertal Man!!) have always been considered human. Archaic humans, primitive humans, ancient humans, but humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kubie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/09/21/irish-cannibals-and-neanderthal-sex-just-how-big-is-our-species/#comment-18964</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kubie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6303#comment-18964</guid>
		<description>Is there a function to the brow enlargement? If so, what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a function to the brow enlargement? If so, what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
