<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Viral Future: Video of My Recent Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/10/27/our-viral-future-video-of-my-recent-talk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/10/27/our-viral-future-video-of-my-recent-talk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudiu Bandea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2012/10/27/our-viral-future-video-of-my-recent-talk/#comment-19114</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudiu Bandea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/?p=6378#comment-19114</guid>
		<description>Carl,

I enjoyed your talk about the future of viruses, as well as your book ‘A Planet of Viruses.’
In a comment to a review of your book in Nature by Robin Weiss, I asked: “What is a virus Dr. Weiss?” (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v474/n7351/full/474279a.html?wt.ec_id=nature-20110616&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v474/n7351/full/474279a.html?wt.ec_id=nature-20110616&lt;/a&gt;).

This question has its roots in a paper I published almost three decades ago in the Journal of Theoretical Biology (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6672474&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6672474&lt;/a&gt;) in which I outlined the scientific and academic constrains associated with the dogma of viruses as virus particles, and  proposed a new model for the origin and nature of viruses (an open access update of this model is available at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3886/version/1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3886/version/1&lt;/a&gt;).

Given you interest and fascination with viruses, I wonder what do you think about the comment and about the alternative paradigm on the nature and evolutionary origin of viruses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl,</p>
<p>I enjoyed your talk about the future of viruses, as well as your book ‘A Planet of Viruses.’<br />
In a comment to a review of your book in Nature by Robin Weiss, I asked: “What is a virus Dr. Weiss?” (<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v474/n7351/full/474279a.html?wt.ec_id=nature-20110616" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v474/n7351/full/474279a.html?wt.ec_id=nature-20110616</a>).</p>
<p>This question has its roots in a paper I published almost three decades ago in the Journal of Theoretical Biology (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6672474" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6672474</a>) in which I outlined the scientific and academic constrains associated with the dogma of viruses as virus particles, and  proposed a new model for the origin and nature of viruses (an open access update of this model is available at: <a href="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3886/version/1" rel="nofollow">http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3886/version/1</a>).</p>
<p>Given you interest and fascination with viruses, I wonder what do you think about the comment and about the alternative paradigm on the nature and evolutionary origin of viruses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
