Would You Stick Pins In A Voodoo Doll of Your Child?

By Neuroskeptic | February 5, 2016 3:24 pm

Well? Would you…?

This was the question faced by the participants in a rather extraordinary series of studies described in a new paper from Illinois psychologists Randy J. McCarthy and colleagues. In total, 1081 parents with children aged under 18 were presented with an outline of a person, and asked to imagine that it was their own child. They were told to think of a time when their child made them angry. Finally, they were asked how many pins they would like to stick into the “doll” in order to “inflict harm on or physically punish their child”.

Read More

Schizophrenia, Hubris and Science

By Neuroskeptic | February 1, 2016 3:14 pm



A press-release from the Harvard-MIT Broad Institute reaches astonishing heights of hyperbole in announcing a new schizophrenia study (Sekar et al. 2016). Here’s the release:

Genetic study provides first-ever insight into biological origin of schizophrenia

Landmark analysis reveals excessive “pruning” of connections between neurons in brain predisposes to schizophrenia

A landmark study, based on genetic analysis of nearly 65,000 people, has revealed that a person’s risk of schizophrenia is increased if they inherit specific variants in a gene related to “synaptic pruning” – the elimination of connections between neurons. The findings represent the first time that the origin of this devastating psychiatric disease has been causally linked to specific gene variants and a biological process…

Read More

The Automatic Neuroscientist

By Neuroskeptic | January 30, 2016 6:01 am

We’ve learned this week that computers can play Go. But at least there’s one human activity they will never master: neuroscience. A computer will never be a neuroscientist. Except… hang on. A new paper just out in Neuroimage describes something called The Automatic Neuroscientist. Oh.

Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: fMRI, methods, papers, science, select, Top Posts

Plagiarism Is Theft – But Of What?

By Neuroskeptic | January 26, 2016 3:58 pm

It’s widely accepted that plagiarism is a bad thing. But why is this? What makes it wrong?


Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: ethics, PIE, science, select, Top Posts

“Cat-gras Delusion” – The Man Who Saw His Cat As An Impostor

By Neuroskeptic | January 21, 2016 5:39 pm

Capgras syndrome is a strange disorder in which the sufferer becomes convinced that someone close to them has been replaced by an impostor.


Yet now, a new and even stranger variant of the syndrome has been reported – “Cat-gras”. This is the name coined by Harvard neurologists R. Ryan Darby and David Caplan in a new paper in the journal Neurocase. The authors describe the case of a man who believed that his cat was in fact a different cat.

Read More

A Neural Response to “Trigger” Stimuli in PTSD?

By Neuroskeptic | January 17, 2016 8:04 am

A new paper in the prestigious Journal of Neuroscience makes some exciting claims about the neurobiology of PTSD – but are the methods solid?

Read More

Genetic Testing for Autism as an Existential Question

By Neuroskeptic | January 16, 2016 5:37 am

A special issue of the journal Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics features perspectives from various people who have experience with genetic testing. Many of the articles look interesting – with titles such as I Had Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease Without My Consent. But my attention was drawn to one piece in particular, called A Sister, a Father and a Son: Autism, Genetic Testing, and Impossible Decisions. The author of the article has chosen to remain anonymous.

The piece recounts how one autistic woman, the author’s sister, was faced with a very personal ethical decision.

Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: autism, ethics, genes, papers, select, Top Posts

The Myth of the Brain’s Pain Matrix?

By Neuroskeptic | January 9, 2016 8:51 am

How does the brain encode physical pain? Which brain areas (if any) respond only to painful stimuli?

Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: fMRI, papers, select, Top Posts, Uncategorized

Does Ageism Cause Alzheimer’s?

By Neuroskeptic | January 6, 2016 9:13 am

Last month, a neuroscience paper got a lot of attention for reporting that Negative Age Stereotypes Predict Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers.

It was greeted by headlines such as:

If you think elderly people are icky, you’re more likely to get Alzheimer’s (Healthline)

Lack of respect for elderly may be fuelling Alzheimer’s epidemic (The Telegraph)

Your attitude about aging may impact how you age (TIME)

The research, published in the journal Psychology and Aging, wasn’t about Alzheimer’s disease per se. Rather, the study claims that holding negative attitudes towards the elderly (ageism) is correlated with the later development of neurobiological changes, or biomarkers, linked to Alzheimer’s. The authors, from Yale University and the National Institute on Aging, were led by Becca Levy.

Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: media, mental health, papers, select, Top Posts

Can Psychology Be an Empirical Science?

By Neuroskeptic | January 2, 2016 8:24 am

In a provocative new paper, Norwegian psychologist Jan Smedslund argues that psychology “cannot be an empirical science”. Smedslund is a veteran of the field; his first paper was published in 1953.

Read More

CATEGORIZED UNDER: papers, philosophy, science, select, Top Posts


No brain. No gain.

See More

@Neuro_Skeptic on Twitter


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar