Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Children?

By Neuroskeptic | November 18, 2013 3:28 pm

So say Colorado-based researchers Sandy K. Wurtele and collegues in a new paper in the journal Sexual Abuse:

Nearly 10% of males and 4% of females reported some likelihood of having sex with children or viewing child pornography.

The study is an interesting attempt to probe the darkest depths of human nature, and raises questions about self-awareness.

danger_manWurtele et al recruited 435 participants who completed a fully anonymous online survey. They were either undergraduate psychology students or came via Amazon’s MTurk (handy for research).

The lucky volunteers got to answer a range of questions about their sexuality and childhood experiences, and were then asked to rate their agreement with three statements:

I am sexually attracted to little children; I fantasize about having sex with a child; I masturbate to fantasies about having sex with a child

Here, 4% of men gave some degree of endorsement to each question (see below).

Other items asked how likely participants would be to commit various crimes “if you were sure that no one would know and that you would not get caught or be punished.”

40% of men said that they might rob a bank For buying sex, 34%; for sexual assault of an adult, the percentage who might was 16%; 13% for murder, 9% for viewing child pornography, 6% for actually having sex with a child and 5% for zoophilia.

For women, all of these rates were lower. Still, 2% of females said they might engage in child sex.

Rather worrying. But it turns out that these percentages are the result of a “you’re either with us, or you’re with the terrorists” approach to psychometrics.

The authors classed people as ‘endorsing’ or ‘admitting an interest’ in a particular behaviour if they gave any answer other than “Strongly Disagree” on a 6-point scale. That is, those who said they moderately disagreed were lumped with those (if there were any) who “Strongly Agreed” and all the other answers from the 5 options above absolute zero.

I’m not sure that makes sense.

The selection of the sample is also a concern; the authors note that the title of the study (“Sexual Experiences and Attitudes”) may have attracted a certain kind of person.

The authors acknowledge four limitations, but don’t address the biggest one – the fact that the survey is entirely self report. The questions assume that people can accurately introspect and to predict their own future behaviour, yet this is far from assured.

For example, if you ask people whether they would ever electrocute someone with 450 volts as part of a psychology experiment, they would say: never; I’m not that kind of person. But about 65% people put into that situation do, in fact, do that as Stanley Milgram showed.

Yet if we can be so wrong about whether we’d torture someone, can we trust our own beliefs as to whether we’d ever rob a bank – or have sex with a child?

ResearchBlogging.orgWurtele SK, Simons D, & Moreno T (2013). Sexual Interest in Children Among an Online Sample of Men and Women: Prevalence and Correlates. Sexual Abuse PMID: 24215791

  • Aaron Boyden

    Also, though the first question said “little children,” for some of the other questions people still may have thought teenagers could count as children, which might push some people from strong disagreement to moderate disagreement.

    • Semigrounded

      I agree, although I think even “little children” could encompass pubescent teenagers, especially for older survey takers. I wonder if they thought “prepubescent” was too clinical. It had to have occurred to them to use it. If you want to gauge desires in a SAS, though, you want it to be clinical, you want to remove the moral knee jerk response that comes from having the words “children” and “sex” in the same sentence.

      Here’s how I would have designed the survey:

      –Would you, in the future, consider a sexual encounter with a 7-10 year old.

      –Would you, in the future, consider a sexual encounter with a 10-prepuscent 13 year old.

      –Would you, in the future, consider a sexual encounter with a pubescent 13-15 year old.

      –Would you, in the future, consider a sexual encounter with a 15-17 year old.

      The survey makers should also be cautious about what fantasy actually says about desire. What if the survey taker’s child self experimented with a friend of the same age. Does the enduring eroticism of that memory reflect pedophilia? My guess is no. Could it lead to a Moderately Disagree on this question:
      I masturbate to fantasies about having sex with a child.

      Sure. How often? %6 of the time?

      • Neuroskeptic

        Excellet point about remembered childhood experimentation.

    • Jimmy Coltrane

      Ridiculous. People don’t think of teenagers as ‘little children’.

      • Aaron Boyden

        My point was that the other questions didn’t say “little children.” It’s unclear whether people would have assumed all the questions are asking about exactly the same ages.

        • Jimmy Coltrane

          Yep, I didn’t read your post properly. My bad.

  • Frank Arroyo

    Keep your sick surveys to yourself!
    For it is written: If your hand is making you steal, cut it off , for it is better to enter into the kingdom of God without the limb that’s making you stumble than not entering at all.( so if your one of these sick individuals , give yourself a lobotomy!

    • Neuroskeptic

      Fair enough, but don’t blame the survey.

    • Crimson Mask

      Except that paedophilia is not prohibited in that Christian Bible. Rather, probably the majority of marriages throughout the text involved “underage” partners (by modern standards). Around the time Jesus was born, Jewish women were typically married at the age of 12, so Mary herself was probably around that age when she traveled to Bethlehem.

  • TheManOnFire

    Let’s be real. Those who object to the study or try to explain away the findings are IN DENIAL of the sickest and most twisted aspects of the human mind. It is this kind of denial and refusal to accept it that leads to stigmas, that then prevent self-aware individuals who have such fantasies from coming forward and seeking help!!

    I’ve never known such ignorance than to deny the inner depravity of imagination.

    • Antonio Machado

      There are some of us that don’t offend, we have no intention whatsoever of harming children

    • tonygoffe

      Yet, imagination has given mankind some of the greatest gifts it now enjoys… ironic …

  • Jan Moren

    Look at the data: using the same criterion, 13% would commit murder, while less than half – 6% – would have sex with a child. And murder is at least as heinous a crime as molestation.

    If you take north America (where this survey was carried out), the intentional murder rate per year is 3.9 per 100000, or about 0.0039% Assume the vast majority of murderers only kill once, and that your “active time” would be between 15 and 75 years of age, about 0.23% of adults will actually commit murder at one point.

    Which would mean the equivalent number of actual child molesters would be 0.1% or one in a thousand. That’s not a lot of people by any stretch, and that’s before the caveat that the nature of this survey probably overestimates sexual molesters relative to other crimes.

    What it’s saying is, this is likely not a big problem; certainly less of a problem than murder, and nobody seems to be able to agree on even very simple measures against that.

    • Neuroskeptic

      Mmm. But the respondants were asked if they’d commit murder in a hypothetical scenario where they could be sure of never being caught.

      Few people get that “opportunity”. So it might be that 13% would murder but only 0.23% ever do.

      Maybe men in exreme situations, such as having the chance to kill civilians during a war, would come closer to the 13% murder rate…

      • Jan Moren

        The “never getting caught” qualifier applied equally to both cases, though, and so does the real possibility of being caught for both crimes.

        So the relative comparison stands, I think. And so does the conclusion that we should worry a lot more about potential murderers than child molesters if this survey is correct.

        • Neuroskeptic


          I just thought of a situation where men did have sex with children and get away with it: ancient Greece.

          • Jonathan Gress

            Also try modern Afghanistan.

        • Leah Groh

          Wow your a smart one you can only kill a person once but you can molest a person over and over where is your head

      • Lynn Gazis-Sax

        “If anyone molested my child I might kill him” could get a person from “strongly disagree” to only “moderately disagree” on the murder question.

    • Inyalabudbud Punjabbidaliwad

      Pedophilia is as heinous as murder??? Where did you get your moral compass?? The Bible documents the FIRST murder and that it was a lifetime mark of heinous-ness. Pedophilia is not even mentioned in the Bible……the book that defines our Judeo Christian set of societal norms, mores, and laws!
      Pedophilia hating, is the lunatic DSM-5 hysteria that permeates a torches and pitchfork society, full of knuckle dragging numb nuts……America!

      • tonygoffe

        ..The Bible does not even mention the ‘P’ word..or derivatives, and neither does the Koran.. Ayisha, the Prophets’ (pbuh) favourite wife, was 12 years old. She is revered in Islam.

  • tim faber

    Wouldn’t the logic with respect to Milgram show a more alarming pattern? Given that about 96 % of men in the sample did not endorse child pornography/child sex abuse wouldn’t the actual number be in fact much higer (when put in an ‘applicable’ situation)?

    • Neuroskeptic

      Quite possibly.

      I’m not sure what the ‘situation’ would be, for child sex, because Milgram-type situations involve authority or friend’s pressure of some kind, and most people are not friends with paedophiles.

      However in terms of adult sexual assault there are well known examples of ‘normal’ men joining in such attacks once their friends are involved.

      So I agree that if a situation ever arose where there was social pressure to abuse children, many men would do so. Luckily these seem rare…

      • tim faber

        Yes, that makes sense, social pressure would probably be a less important factor in a child situation. Maybe anonymity (online pornography) here is a more important factor, but then same goes for responses on the study you describe here.

      • Len Tucker

        I would think most people have at least 10 friends. Most people aren’t aware they are friends with a pedophile but they are. Out of all of my friends. maybe 6 know about my interest in little girls. But I have other friends, who have no clue. There are at least 10 people I’d consider friends and I’m fairly introverted. Extroverts probably normally have a much greater number.

        But what does it matter if their friends are pedophiles? I don’t have sex with children or look at child porn. Same is true for a large number of pedophiles. And a large, perhaps much greater than the majority, portion child molesters are not pedophiles.

        And why would a pedophile even want to pressure friends into having sex with children, assuming they are just a pedophile. I don’t want to sexually abuse children. I much rather sexually please a girl I care about. It makes as much sense as gay people trying to get straight people to have gay sex.

  • Pingback: Tuesday Wrap Up | Sex with Timaree()

  • Turd Ferguson

    humans sicken me

    • Anon


    • Chris

      Human behavior is very complex, and the ones who sicken you are the ones who don’t fall within your accepted paradigm. There will be the fringe in every species. It has, however, been proven over thousands of years that a societies most reviled don’t go away just because you hate and kill them. Why? Because society failed to recognize that while unattractive to most, the behavior falls with in the range of normal….or expected.,,,in regard to a general over view of the precise. And those fringe people will be there. If you kill all racists, or gays, alive today….would we ever see a gay person again? Of course we would. It is part of being human. You can say pedophiles aren’t human, but yes….in fact they are. It’s a horrible affliction in a world that offers no healthy outlet.

      • Jennifer Mayhue


  • Pingback: O lado sombrio do ser humano | Mulheres em extinção()

  • Pingback: Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Childr...()

  • Antonio Machado

    I will use this as an opportunity to clarify that one main point of the article was that pedophilia is a sexual orientation. I’m a pedophile and I belong to a group of minor attracted people committed to NOT harming children.

    Let me say it again. Some of us have no intention to offend or harm any children, and we are also humans, as yourselves.

  • Pingback: ¿Son uno de cada diez hombres atraídos sexualmente por los niños? [ENG]()

  • Pingback: Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Children? - Neuroskeptic | |

  • Zachary Stansfield

    Also, according to these author’s criteria, 40% said they would consider robbing a bank, whereas only 34% said they would be willing to buy sex.

    Considering the number of people who actually do rob banks, relative to the massively larger number who pay for sex, this statistic is beyond comprehension.

    • Neuroskeptic

      Heh. Although in most places, you are much more likely to get away with paying for sex, than for robbing a bank.

  • Pingback: Are 4 In 100 Women Sexually Attracted To Childr...()

  • Gene Partlow

    The methodology of this ‘study’ seems sloppy to me. I can’t imagine a large number of people self-reporting ‘anonymously’
    on such a charged and criminality-coupled question in this age
    of online spying, bullying and Über-brother NSA activities. That said, the core idea merits study and strikes me as plausible
    since we, chimpanzees and bonobos are descended from a “last-common-ancestor” species whose heyday was 4-6 million years ago (give or take a week). We already know that chimpanzees occasionally commit murder and (if memory serves) cannibalism (?). So do we.

    More to the point, bonobos (the sexy chimpanzee) are notoriously
    promiscuous, to such a degree that, ‘protecting’ conservative mores, many zoos refused to display them. Further, sexual
    social bonding among bonobos occurs between males and females, males and males, females and females and between adults and juveniles. So it should not be surprising that, at
    least to some small degree, we also retain that potential
    ourselves. We just make the healthy, and plausibly unconscious, social decision not to indulge in cross-generational sex, to
    protect children and their innocence. The more we understand
    the human condition, without hysteria, the saner we are. The
    more we suppress self-knowledge, especially in touchy areas
    like sexuality, the more we court tragedy and then wonder
    foolishly how crimes like rape, murder and child-molestation
    could possibly happen.

    Demons in the cellar, so to speak.

  • Interested Person

    Having known one of the researchers for some time and the rigors of their analysis I can tell you that the author of this piece is taking a very quick and dirty view of the article.

    While there will be holes in all research studies — what we have her is a very quick and easy analysis without any real rigor. And everyone is commenting on this very high-level analysis.

    I commend the actual study to those of you who want to enter into a real discussion.

    • Neuroskeptic

      Thanks for the comment, but do you have any specifics? In what way was my post wrong?

  • Jayarava

    I can’t see that such studies tell us anything about the real behaviour of people. The participants answer questions that are badly worded and hypothetical and the answers lumped together indiscriminately. It’s bad method. And what people say on surveys may be uncorrelated with their actual behaviour and we’d never know.

    There is certainly nothing here to compare with the Catholic Church’s internal data on men who have sex with children in the church (btw paedophile is a wrong word – cf. bibliophile. Most of us love children!). The Church knows who has been accused or has been caught. They don’t have to guess or float hypothetical scenarios, they know exactly who, where and when. (And they ought to just give that info to the police).

  • domy

    Do we know how many of these people have had relationships with adults when they were children? Is there a correlation with their answers?

  • For Nonviolence

    These studies (summarised by Professor Tromovitch in the posters below) indicate an even higher prevalence of such attractions among men:

    • Jimmy Coltrane

      9 times higher no less. So what the first article really suggests is that the majority of people are self- delusional.

  • Jimmy Coltrane

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the implication behind the last few paragraphs is that the statistic may be lower than presented due to the Milgram experiment phenomenon. Whereas, it would be more reasonable to assume that the statistic would be higher; that is, the Milgram exp showed that people are less moral and principled than they like to believe- this is the real reason behind the siutation. Although, one confusing point about this survey is that 6% said they’d have sex with a child, yet only 4% admitted any kind of attraction to them… the only relevant explanatory point I can glean from the article is that the latter used the term ‘little children’ as opposed to just children. 9% for child pornography though, wowsa. So peadophilia is more common than homosexuality according to statistics.

  • Kevin Pratt

    I believe that “India” has the highest rate of child sexual abuse. (something like 395 million children) Then maybe followed by “South Africa” where people with AID’s believed sex with a virgin little girl (under 10 years old) could cure AID’s back in the late 80’s – early 90’s.

  • Crimson Mask

    “The questions assume that people can accurately introspect and to
    predict their own future behaviour, yet this is far from assured.” Which annoys the hell out of me. I can understand people having the sense to cover themselves from potential judgment. But if you really haven’t sorted yourself out well enough to realize you do have destructive and cruel instincts, like every other human on the planet, I have trouble trusting you to keep those instincts in check.

  • Aaron Talley

    people have little control over who they find beautiful.your brain doesnt factor age .it factors what it sees.the truth is that young girls are beautiful,denying that is just that.

  • Pingback: Homepage()

  • Joe Minggo

    Some say there is this myth that young boys do not want to have sex with men, and when this happens it is said they are abused. I say this is a myth. Some young “boys” can’t wait to reach 18 so they can get on craigslist to have sex with older men.



  • Rob

    Child sexual attraction is normal and loving it has been for thousands OF years

  • Rob

    My first experience exploring with it was with my nephew he was 3 and i was 15. I noticed him doing things to himself like rubbing touching and humping as young as 15 months old, but when he was 3 i was in my room on the computer, looking at porn while i was masterbating. When he ran into my room, i first was like no get out, but he kept standind there smiling, so i got up and shut and locked the door, i than set back down and continued to masterbating, when he came up to me and began touching my penis i just layed back and continue to let him, than the most impressive thing happened he bent down and put my penis in his mouth and licking the tip of it, i was having so much pleasure, than i released my sperm in his mouth he said milk ? Lol i said yes big boy milk. Wr cuntinued to that for sometime he wasn’t until he reached 5 or six before actually started engaging in anal sex but he is now 10 and he and i make love all the time

  • exit30

    Poll 100 men if they would have sex with a 17 yr old girl if they could get away with it, who is by definition a minor, any one of them that says no is lying. I live in a small tourist beach town and see grown men ogling young girls in bikini’s all the time. More and more young women are being busted for having sex with underage boys.

    • fizzman

      exit30 already



No brain. No gain.

About Neuroskeptic

Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond. His blog offers a look at the latest developments in neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology through a critical lens.


See More

@Neuro_Skeptic on Twitter


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar