Is Ultrasonic Brain Stimulation The Future?

By Neuroskeptic | February 9, 2014 1:10 pm

A paper just out in Nature Neuroscience proposes a new tool for neuroscientists who want to stimulate the brain – ultrasound.

There are already a number of established ways of modulating human brain activity. As neuronal firing is essentially electrical, most of these methods rely on electricity – such as TDCS – or on magnetic fields, which induce electrical currents – as in TMS.

Now Virginia Tech researchers Wynn Legon and colleagues say that a very different approach, ultrasound, could be the next big thing: Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans

Ultrasound for neurostimulation is not an entirely new idea. It’s been shown to work in cell cultures and in animals, but this is the first attempt in humans. The idea is simple: focus a beam of sound waves at a very high frequency (500 kHz, about 25 times too high for humans to hear) through the skull and into the brain. This, we are told, modulates neuronal firing – although it’s not clear quite how. Legon et al write:

The pulsed acoustic pressure wave may locally shift the balance of excitation and inhibition by acting on mechanically sensitive components of the brain, including cell membranes, ion channels and synaptic vesicle cycles (1). Our physiological observations suggest that ultrasound transiently shifts the balance of neuronal activity in favor of local inhibition…

Legon et al used a pulsed 500 ms burst of 500 kHz ultrasound via a generator placed in contact with the scalp. What’s remarkable about this stimulation was how selective it was. Simulations, based on acoustic data, predict that the beam was just a few millimeters wide, and a few centimetres long, even after penetrating the skull:

legonThis tight localization could make ultrasound very attractive to neuroscientists. Other neurostimulation methods are rather sloppy. If ultrasound gives us the power to zap a cylinder of cortex roughly the size of your little finger, that would be incredible.

But what exactly did a poke from this sonic finger do? Well… it was rather subtle.

Legon et al say that the ultrasound ‘modulated’ neural activity; when they aimed the beam at the somatosensory cortex (area S1), which is responsible for touch sensation, it altered (on average) the evoked response potential (ERP) generated in the S1 cortex in response to a touch stimulus: statistically significant differences were found at two time points (grey shading.)

legon_ultrasound

The ultrasound also improved subject’s ability to perceive the difference between two different tactile stimuli, suggesting that the modulation of touch-evoked brain responses was actually beneficial.

This is really interesting. However, the authors say that none of the volunteers actually felt any effects of the stimulation. This is in stark contrast to TMS, which is generally an unmistakable experience because, amongst other things, it stimulates the nerves in the head. Not much fun, but at least there’s no doubt that it’s doing something

Is it safe? The authors issue a note of caution to anyone planning to muck about with the technique:

Ultrasound at high intensities or during long exposures can cause irreversible tissue damage, like any energy source, so caution should be used when implementing it to modulate brain activity.

However, they say that ultrasound of the intensity they used has no known harmful effects on tissue, and that the energy involved is far below the official safe limits for ultrasonic imaging:

Ultrasound has not caused tissue damage in studies implementing its nonthermal bioeffects to modulate neuronal activity at acoustic intensities below those recommended for safe use in diagnostic imaging.

Still, I wonder who was the brave soul who volunteered to be the very first human guinea pig…

ResearchBlogging.orgLegon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, Mueller J, Barbour A, Williams A, & Tyler WJ (2014). Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nature neuroscience, 17 (2), 322-9 PMID: 24413698

CATEGORIZED UNDER: EEG, methods, papers, select, Top Posts
  • http://petrossa.me/ petrossa

    “Simulations, based on acoustic data, predict that” ouch. I guess i won’t volunteer

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/ Neuroskeptic

    Update: it was pointed out on Twitter that this is not the first published report of ultrasonic neurostimulation in humans. The first was from Hameroff et al (2013) in Brain Stimulation.

    Legon et al cite this paper (albeit deep in the Discussion.)

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com Longmire

    I’ve played around with the ultrasound machines that are for therapy and realized real quick that it seemed to be doing more damage than good. Any benefit of that devise could be replicated by merely pressing a finger into the muscle but that would be hard to charge insurance for. As far as the neurostimulation goes they’re playing with fire, oh no wait someone’s consciousness, and cant help to think that it will have adverse side effects especially in the hands of the incompetent.

  • Pingback: 2004-02-14 Spike activity « Mind Hacks()

  • Pingback: Is Ultrasonic Brain Stimulation The Future? | Betteridge’s Law()

  • Amtram

    How much of the results were based on perception? It looks like the first paper relied a lot on subjects’ reported improvements, which isn’t the most reliable measurement tool, right?

  • Kaiser

    I look at this technology as another potential means to treat very mental illness and in general develop healthier brains. There need not be anything sinister about it.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Neuroskeptic

No brain. No gain.

About Neuroskeptic

Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond. His blog offers a look at the latest developments in neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology through a critical lens.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

@Neuro_Skeptic on Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »