Update on the Journal of Stem Cells

By Neuroskeptic | September 14, 2017 4:18 am

In April, I called attention to what I saw as serious ethical and scientific problems with a biomedical journal, the Journal of Stem Cells. Now, this publication has been removed from a leading journal index.

journal-of-stem-cells

I wrote in April that:

I have discovered evidence of plagiarism in two papers in the Journal… the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal is the corresponding author on both of these papers, raising questions about the quality of editorial oversight.

I also raised questions about apparent financial conflicts of interest shared by the Editor-in-Chief and a regular author in the journal. The ethics of some of the human stem-cell studies published in the Journal was also a major concern. One paper reported a trial of an surgical treatment for children with autism as young as 4; there was no indication that this invasive study had been approved by any regulatory authority.

What added to my concern was that this journal was indexed in MEDLINE, the de facto gold standard index of peer-reviewed medical and scientific journals. Inclusion in MEDLINE is widely seen as a mark of credibility, making it more likely that doctors and patients would pay attention to it.

I’m now pleased to report that the Journal of Stem Cells is no longer MEDLINE indexed. I believe that this change was prompted by an email I sent to the MEDLINE authorities in April alerting them to my concerns.

The Journal also appears to have stopped publishing new papers in the past couple of months, although there has been no statement saying that it’s shut down.

Many thanks for everyone who helped with my investigation.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: blogging, papers, science, select, Top Posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Pingback: Update on the Journal of Stem Cells - NEUZD()

  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    Science is not a confluence of declared equal voices. Science is bloodsport with reality hanging in the balance. Would rectangular airplane windows be socially gainful? Tell it to the de Havilland DH 106 Comet.

    Social intent vomits incessant floods of degreed unqualified people. Do not tolerate their outputs.

  • BigBadSeattleLad

    Well done – medical journalism is the last place for lowly mercenaries.

    • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/ Neuroskeptic

      Thanks!

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Neuroskeptic

No brain. No gain.

About Neuroskeptic

Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond. His blog offers a look at the latest developments in neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology through a critical lens.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

@Neuro_Skeptic on Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+