A Chink in the Brain Armor: the NFL, Concussion and Omega-3s

By Neuroskeptic | September 17, 2018 5:03 pm

On Twitter, I was pointed to the strange story of Brain Armor®, a nutritional supplement which is supposed to promote brain health.

While there are many supplements that are sold for the same purpose, Brain Armor has a unique claim to fame: it is the official brain health supplement of Pro Football Legends (PFL), the “commercial marketing arm of the NFL Alumni.”

brain_armor

Brain Armor’s links to the NFL Alumni raised eyebrows on Twitter because the NFL has famously been the target of legal actions brought by former players who say they suffered concussions and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) from their time as professional football players. The NFL has agreed to a settlement that’s estimated to pay out over $1 billion to former players and their families. The controversy was even made into a movie called Concussion.

Another Brain Armor partner is Pop Warner, the largest youth football organization in the USA and, like the NFL, the target of some CTE lawsuits. “We are constantly working to identify and implement the most current, science-driven methods to improving overall player safety. Brain Armor is a great addition to that approach”, according to Pop Warner.

Armor Against What?

What exactly is Brain Armor supposed to do? Like most nutritional neuro-supplements, Brain Armor’s website makes no strong health claims. The supplement is not explicitly promoted as a solution to any health problem, and a disclaimer warns that “This product not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”

However, I think it is fair to say that there is an implication that Brain Armor will help to protect the brain against injuries. The name “Brain Armor” is rather suggestive: armor, after all, defends against blows. The product is actively targeted at football players and in 2018, no-one involved in American football is unaware of concussion and CTE.

If you look at the testimonials pages for Brain Armor, you’ll find references to concussion and brain injury, like this one:

Optimal cognitive function, decision-making, and protection against direct impact and sub-concussive head trauma is high priority for military personnel. Obtaining adequate Omega-3 DHA through dietary sources and certified safe supplements is one way that nutrition can positively impact warfighters performance.

Finally, if you look online, you will find that people are making the link between Brain Armor (and similar products) and concussion. Overall, while Brain Armor are not themselves claiming to protect the brain against concussion and trauma, it is clear that some consumers do think this Armor will protect their brain, and I suspect that Brain Armor are happy that this perception exists.

Untested Armor

So what’s the science?

The main ingredient in Brain Armor are omega-3 fatty acids. You’ve probably already heard of these, as omega-3’s have been the focus of a lot of research and media interest. There is some evidence that they improve health, especially of the heart and possibly the brain. It’s fair to say the benefits, if any, of omega-3 supplementation are still being debated.

What about concussion specifically? Here, it’s easy to summarize the evidence base: there has never been a published trial of omega-3s in the prevention or treatment of concussion in humans.

The closest thing to a human trial was a 2016 study reporting that omega-3 reduced levels of the ironically-named NF-L, considered a blood biomarker of brain injury, in football players. This study didn’t examine actual clinical outcomes. There are also a number of as-yet unpublished trials either ongoing or recently finished.

There have been some studies in rodents showing benefits of omega-3 in concussion and brain injury. And there are many scientific papers discussing the possibility that there might be a benefit of omega-3 in humans exposed to concussion and brain trauma.

One such paper was published recently in Nutritional Neuroscience: Supplements, nutrition, and alternative therapies for the treatment of traumatic brain injury. This paper is rather interesting from the perspective of Brain Armor and the NFL.

Conflicts of Interest?

One of the authors of the Nutritional Neuroscience paper is Dr. Julian E. Bailes, a neurosurgeon and omega-3 researcher who serves as Senior Medical Advisor to Brain Armor and as Co-Chair of the Brain Armor Foundation.

Also on the author list is Dr. Joseph Maroon, another neurosurgeon and a top advisor to the NFL. Maroon is famous for his view that the risks of CTE in football players have been overstated. But Maroon has also long been an evangelist for omega-3s, although his preferred brand is called Omax3, a rival to Brain Armor.

In 2015, Maroon had to correct a paper of his, published in PLoS ONE, after failing to declare his conflicts of interest, including his links to the NFL. But in the 2018 Nutritional Neuroscience paper, Maroon doesn’t list any conflicts of interest, and neither does Bailes.

To be fair, omega-3 is only a small part of the 2018 paper, but a declaration of the possible conflicts wouldn’t have gone amiss.

Another Brain Armor-linked researcher with a possibly laid-back approach to conflicts of interest is Dr. Jonathan M. Oliver. Oliver, who was lead author on the omega-3 biomarker study mentioned earler, was first author of a March 2018 piece in which he heralded the “emerging preclinical evidence in favor of omega-3.”

Oliver declared no interests or financial disclosures, and yet he had been awarded funding by the Brain Armor Foundation in 2017 to research the effects of Brain Armor on brain injury biomarkers in rugby players. Here are the details.

Overall, I was surprised to see the close links between Brain Armor, and similar products like Omax3, and many of the leading researchers on omega-3 and concussion/brain injury.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: ethics, law, papers, select, Top Posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • smut clyde

    “positively impact warfighters performance.”

    “Warfighters”? OFFS. This is the language of Brawndo advertisements.

    Remember the Chocolate Milk anticoncussion scam from a few years ago?
    https://www.statnews.com/2016/01/11/chocolate-milk-concussion/

    • Jon

      Brain Armour, it’s got what brains crave!

      • smut clyde

        FOR STRONG BRAINZ

  • Sheilla Dingus

    Interesting article. I especially appreciate the information on conflicts of interest. I did want to point out your link to the concussion settlement, however. The link you provided to the $753 M settlement was rejected by the court, and an amended uncapped settlement was submitted and approved. Here is a link to the final settlement agreement. https://www.nflconcussionsettlement.com/ViewPDFDoc.aspx
    When this agreement was announced and estimated at $1 billion, it has often been referred to at that number, but it is difficult to predict what the final payout will actually be, although the most recent status report to the court estimated it at $1.4 billion. As of today, $543,484,760 has been approved, equating, in the first 18 months the approximate dollar amount of approvals at the 10 year mark of the initial proposed settlement. Of this $335,011,539 has actually been paid to class members. The NFL is pushing back against many claims in an effort to restrain their payouts to the originally estimated number. This article gives a current update of the current state of and challenges in the settlement. http://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/nfl-sabotage/

    • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/ Neuroskeptic

      Thanks! I’ve updated the post

  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/EquivPrinFail.pdf Uncle Al

    Drink linseed oil, 53.3wt-% omega-3 fatty acids: If you dribble, rub it into your wood dining table.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Neuroskeptic

No brain. No gain.

About Neuroskeptic

Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond. His blog offers a look at the latest developments in neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology through a critical lens.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

@Neuro_Skeptic on Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+