DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Bdelloid rotifers – the world’s most radiation-resistant animals
Chimpanzees take risks but bonobos play it safe »

Rising carbon dioxide levels weaken plant defences against hungry insects

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchWe’ve all seen the images of receding glaciers and stranded polar bears that accompany talks of climate change. But rising carbon dioxide levels also have subtler and less familiar effects, and may prove to be a boon for many animal groups. Plant-eating insects, for example, have much to gain in a high -CO2 future as rising concentrations of the gas can compromise the defences of the plants they feed on.

Beetlesonsoybeans.jpgPlants and herbivorous insects are engaged in a silent war that we are rarely privy too, where chemicals  act as both weapons and messengers. Munching mandibles trigger the production of signalling molecules like jasmonic acid that announce the presence of invaders to other plants of the plant, neighbouring individuals, or even parasitic wasps, which attack the pests and turn them into living larders for wasp eggs.

The battle isn’t over even after parts of the plant are eaten. Beetles, for example, rely on enzymes called cysteine proteinases to digest the plant proteins they swallow, and free up valuable amino acids for the insects’ own growth. But when plants detect jasmonic acid signals, they produce chemicals called “cysteine proteinase inhibitors” (CystPIs) that block the insects’ digestive enzymes and prevent them from fully digesting their meals.

But these defences may buckle as carbon dioxide levels rise. Jorge Zavala and colleagues at the University of Illinois found that increasing levels of CO2 reduce the ability of soybeans to use jasmonate signals. That shrinks their stockpiles of defensive CystPIs and makes them more vulnerable to hungry pests including two voracious species of beetle – the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera) and the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica). Given that soybeans are an increasingly important food crop, it’s in our interest to stop insects from eating them so that we can instead.

Failing defences

7396.jpgZavala’s research forms part of the innovative SoyFACE (Free Air Concentration Enrichment) experiment. Here, where soybeans are grown under realistic field conditions but can be fumigated with levels of carbon dioxide that match those predicted for the future. For the moment, these levels are sitting at 380 parts per million, an already considerable increase from the 280 ppm experienced at the start of the Industrial Revolution. If our emissions proceed unabated, the atmosphere of 2050 will pack a staggering 550 ppm of CO2.

Previously, Zavala found that soybean allotments grown at these concentrations attract larger numbers of these plant-predators, which then lived longer and produced more eggs. The soybeans used the added carbon dioxide to produce more sugars but Zavala found that this extra nutritional content couldn’t completely account for the influx of ravenous insects.  

He solved the mystery by analysing the levels of five genes in the leaves of plants grown at normal or raised CO2 conditions. Three of these – acc, lox7 and lox8 – are used to produce defensive signalling molecules. When attacked by Japanese beetles, the plants grown in CO2-rich air failed to induce these three genes to the same extent as plants grown under normal conditions. In contrast, the soybeans’ exposure to carbon dioxide didn’t affect their use of two control genes unrelated to defence, regardless of the presence of the beetles.

Deprived of their usual rush of signalling molecules, the high-CO2 plants were more poorly defended than their ambient-CO2 peers. Their meagre baseline stocks of CystPIs were about half the size and when beetles invaded, they managed to marshal about 40% less reinforcements.

Advantage to beetles

Jbeetle.jpg
Because of this lax security, the beetles were able to digest more of what they ate. Zavala found that the activity of digestive proteinases in the guts of corn rootworms and Japanese beetles was about 40% higher if the pests were fed on soybeans grown in high CO2 levels.

Zavala freely admits that it’s not clear if the other plants would be similarly affected, but he intends to find out. Nor is it clear if the soybeans’ weakened defences would offset the increased growth that they enjoy at high levels of carbon dioxide. But their problems may not be limited to beetles.

Signalling molecules like jasmonic acid control other defences beside the production of CystPIs, as well as a whole variety of important processes within a plant. If rising carbon dioxide levels suppress the levels of these messenger molecules, they could render plants defenceless against a much wider range of herbivores, and worsen any potential losses.

Reference: doi:10.1073/pnas.0800568105; paper to be published in PNAS this week.

Images by Evan Delucia and PiccoloNamek.  

Share

March 25th, 2008 Tags: agricultural science, carbon dioxide, CO2, herbivores, jasmonic acid, pests, plant defences, soybeans
by Ed Yong in Animals, Climate change, Environment, Molecular biology, Plants | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

3 Responses to “Rising carbon dioxide levels weaken plant defences against hungry insects”

  1. 1.   Max Says:
    March 25th, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    Nor is it clear if the soybeans’ weakened defences would offset the increased growth that they enjoy at high levels of carbon dioxide.

    Doesn’t this seem like an incredibly important point to nail down before inferring that CO2 somehow impairs expression of the defensive genes? Especially when they say CO2 did not impair the control genes? Downregulating defensive genes could be a very effective survival strategy when CO2 is overly abundant and the results could imply intentional downregulation rather than defective upregulation.
    I’ve read about the FACE experiments and they’re really interesting. I think that in general global warming could be very good for a lot of species, we just don’t happen to be one of them! This paper seems to trying to make the point that it is bad for plants because it is good for beetles, but it could be perfectly fine for both.

  2. 2.   Ed Yong Says:
    March 27th, 2008 at 5:47 am

    Good points, well made. I have nothing particular to add to that but if the authors of the study are reading this (which they often are), care to chip in?

  3. 3.   Joshua Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 11:31 pm

    Since I like jumping from theory to application (My degree is in engineering, it’s only natural. ;) ), I wonder if it would be possible or feasible to use this sort of technique to start growing future-proof strains of plants. I.e., start a few projects to grow high-CO2 plants and cultivate the ones that manage to evolve either a new defensive mechanism that isn’t hindered by high CO2 or a modified version of their current jasmonic acid defense mechanism that works effectively at high CO2 levels. That way, we’ll already have the CO2-proof varieties available when this becomes a large-scale problem, rather than having to wait for evolution to work its magic on production crops that we’re depending on to meet food needs and suffer a few years of depressed yield.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us