DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« I’ll see some of you on Saturday
Send me your botanical posts »

Holy haemorrhage Batman! Wind turbines burst bat lungs

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchConservationists often object to wind farms because of the possibility that they could kill birds. But birds aren’t the only flying animals to be taken out by turbines – it turns out that bats often lose their lives too, and not in quite the way you might imagine.

Recently, scientists have noticed a large number of dead bats at wind farms around the world. The turbines seem to be taking a particularly heavy toll on migratory species and while it was clear that the scale of these deaths is much larger than expected, it’s less clear why they’re happening at all.

Bats can fly through pitch-darkness through echolocation – a superb biological sonar system that’s particularly good at detecting moving objects. With such state-of-the-art equipment, it’s difficult to believe that these accomplished aeronauts could simply be blundering into the spinning blades. Now, Erin Baerwald and colleagues at the University of Calgary think that they have found the mystery killer, and it’s one that is invisible to the bats’ sonar – areas of low pressure.

As the blades of wind turbines spin, they reduce the pressure of the air around them. As bats fly into these low-pressure zones, the sudden change causes the air in their lungs to expand faster than the bats can exhale. The technical term is “pulmonary barotrauma”. In three syllables, “their lungs burst”. Areas of low pressure are essentially invisible – even if the bats’ sophisticated sonar guides them through the spinning blades, they wouldn’t be able to sense these danger zones until it’s too late.

Windturbine.jpg

CSI Alberta

Baerwald performed autopsies on 188 hoary and silver-haired bats recovered from a wind farm in Alberta, Canada, to determine their cause of death. She found that 90% of them had some form of internal bleeding in their chest cavity that is consistent with death by decompression. A thorough dissection confirmed Baerwald’s interpretation – the majority had damaged lungs and some had distinct air-filled bubbles that were formed by the rupture of their alveolae (the tiny sacs in the lungs through which gases are exchanged with the blood).

It’s not clear what extent of pressure drop would be fatal to a flying bat, but based on the speed of modern turbines, Baerwald calculated that their tips create a fall in pressure of 5-10 kPA (kilopascals). That’s more than enough to seriously harm a lot of mammals and rats cannot withstand even a drop of 4.4 kPa.

About a third of the bats killed by barotraumas also suffered from external injuries, picked up by hitting the blades themselves. It’s likely that these animals stumbled into the turbines after suffering from internal injuries, for only 8% of them – just 6 animals in total – had died from external injuries with no accompanying internal ones.

Birds and bats

Pipistrelle.jpgIt’s possible that the scale of bat fatalities has simply been underestimated in previous studies, which were primarily designed to look for dead birds. Birds are less often killed by wind turbines and Baerwald thinks that their unique breathing apparatus may make them less vulnerable to sudden pressure drops than those of bats. Bat flight is fuelled by large lungs and hearts, oxygen-rich blood and an unusually thin layer separating the gas in their lungs from the blood in their vessels.

In contrast, the lungs of birds are more rigid. Unlike the balloon-like sacs of mammals, those of birds are tube-like, compact and have exceptionally strong capillaries. In low-pressure zones that would pop the lungs of bats, those of birds barely expand. It’s a case of the robin outclassing the bat. Birds do however have a relative disadvantage; they lack the sonar of bats (most species anyway), so most of their turbine-related fatalities are caused by direct hits.

As wind turbines become more common, one group of scientists predict that by 2020, they will kill anywhere from 33,000 to 110,000 bats per year.  That isn’t a reason to cease the development of wind technology, but it is a reason to think about ways of protecting passing bats. Situating wind farms away from migration routes is one possible solution, although these routes aren’t exactly thoroughly mapped out. Shut-off times for turbines during periods of high bat activity is another, although that would slash their electricity production.

Whatever the solution, it’s heartening to see that the issue is at least being taken seriously. After all Baerwald’s research has an intriguing blend of funders – three conservation organisations, such as Bat Conservation International and five energy providers, including Shell Canada.

Reference: Current Biology 18: R695

Share

August 28th, 2008 by Ed Yong in Bats, Conservation | 16 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

16 Responses to “Holy haemorrhage Batman! Wind turbines burst bat lungs”

  1. 1.   sa3r3t Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Part of the reason they’re flying through the low pressure zones caused by the passing fan blade is that they cant see it, they use sonar. This allows them to fly incredibly close to the fans with confidence. Use the sonar which steers them close to the fans to steer them away from it. Either some sort of sonic pulse which is sent at a high frequency to annoy the bats (but not mess up their echolocation) or some other form of sound which would keep them away from the fans.

  2. 2.   Ken Shabby Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 10:25 am

    Bats cannot ‘see’ a rapidly moving object that comes out from hiding, which is why it’s easy to hit a bat with a long stick.

  3. 3.   Ed Yong Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 10:29 am

    “it’s easy to hit a bat with a long stick.”
    A long stick. You mean a bat? :-)
    It’s disturbing that you know this.

  4. 4.   Ed Yong Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 11:08 am

    “some sort of sonic pulse which is sent at a high frequency to annoy the bats”
    A sonic pulse. You mean a bat signal? (This is too easy – I’m stopping now).

  5. 5.   Dennis Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Keep up the puns and you might get battered.

  6. 6.   Matthew L. Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    Fortunately, it has also been discovered that bats avoid radar stations. There are already suggestions to scare bats away from wind farms with radar systems (citation: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000297 ).

  7. 7.   GAC Says:
    August 28th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    I love to watch bats as they come out at night, so the windmills-killing-bats stories always attract my attention. It’s good to know that the reason had been found. Now I can lay my rather idiotic armchair speculations about small internal parts looking like bugs to rest.
    Also, it seems unfortunate that the new data doesn’t seem to give any new ideas about how to mitigate it. Keep us posted on that.

  8. 8.   James Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 4:51 am

    Easy problem to fix, just make some sort of wind turbine out of bats themselves, I’m not much of a scietnist but blue peter has taught me a little bit of cellotape and PVC glue goes along way, if any biotech company wants to employ me, I can be found at this address;
    Dr Bunsen….and assistant beaker
    Sky Labs
    Sesame street

  9. 9.   HolfordWatch Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 10:09 am

    Ah – some friends have several bat colonies in and around their home (bats in their attic for real). They are worried about proposals for a windfarm near their home. But, if this affects migrating bats more than bats out and about on their normal flight-paths, perhaps this might reassure them on this point.

  10. 10.   Nathan Myers Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    This is, ultimately, an engineering problem. There will be lots of ways to address it that will work, more or less, at various costs, and one of them will turn out to be the best. Each person advocating one of the other alternatives will be disappointed, but will have lots of company.

  11. 11.   Kyle A Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    Well said Nate. Oh, the unintended consequences of cleaner energy. Next up, “ambient heat from dark colored solar panels attract endangered insect, leading to DEATH!”

  12. 12.   Steve Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 11:35 pm

    The added bonus of sa3r3t’s suggestions of “some sort of sonic pulse which is sent at a high frequency to annoy the bats” is that it might also keep away the kids…
    http://sciencevideos.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-mosquito-hoodie-repellent-from-the-valleys/

  13. 13.   Chen Says:
    August 30th, 2008 at 8:42 am

    Isn’t it possible to fool the bat’s sonar to think the wind farm is just a big solid object and so make them avoid it?

  14. 14.   web design company Says:
    August 30th, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    Now that they understand this, they should be able to develop some kind of ultrasonic signal that repels bats, since the echo-location functions of bats are so sensitive to certain frequencies

  15. 15.   Mario Says:
    September 1st, 2008 at 8:46 am

    OK, look at a desktop fan and aplly the same … place a grid around it .. !!

  16. 16.   Eileen McCabe Says:
    September 3rd, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Let’s not panic about a single study of a single wind farm that included only 188 bats. Have other possible causes for the barotrauma been ruled out? How many experts were consulted on possible causes. I am not dismissing the importance of evaluating environmental impacts, on the contrary, wind power has possibly enormous environmental benefits. Basing widespread policy decisions on a single, geographically limited study is not good policy or judgment.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

      • edyong209: "The lack of transparency, sweeping generalizations & unsupported conclusions shld've raised red flags at Wired." http://t.co/xz9GLMoG
      • edyong209: @criener <wistful sigh>
      • edyong209: @maggiekb1 Fond of fibre, reticent to breed?
      • edyong209: CONGRATS! RT @DaveMosher: Congrats to newlyweds @virginiahughes and @randalvegter! WOO! @ Battery Gardens Restaurant http://t.co/jZK097uq
      • edyong209: Can old-school drug discovery techniques solve the critiical lack of new antibiotics? http://t.co/rZfpcFMC #allthishashappenedbefore
      • edyong209: Irises, it turns out, change with age. Which is bad news for iris scanners. http://t.co/eALOSBu5
    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us