<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green beards, flocs of yeast and the evolution of cooperation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Bugs Bite the Bullet for Brothers &#124; Big Ten Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Bugs Bite the Bullet for Brothers &#124; Big Ten Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>[...] True, it hasn’t been shown in mammals, but it has appeared in the slime mold Dictyostelium, certain types of yeast, a bacterial plant pathogen and the side-blotched [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] True, it hasn’t been shown in mammals, but it has appeared in the slime mold Dictyostelium, certain types of yeast, a bacterial plant pathogen and the side-blotched [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harmon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall hearing about another &quot;green beard&quot; gene (described as such) in slime molds, critical for their forming of fruiting bodies.  IIRC, the cells showed a similar pattern of excluding non-carriers from the spore case.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall hearing about another &#8220;green beard&#8221; gene (described as such) in slime molds, critical for their forming of fruiting bodies.  IIRC, the cells showed a similar pattern of excluding non-carriers from the spore case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>toto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>Additionally, this shows how &quot;green beard&quot; genes can be extremely simple both in form and function. Green beard genes often seem unlikely to the novice, since they seem to involve rather complex machinery (signalling and recognition) being packed in the same gene. This is a clear example that both signalling and recognition can be achieved by one simple trait.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, this shows how &#8220;green beard&#8221; genes can be extremely simple both in form and function. Green beard genes often seem unlikely to the novice, since they seem to involve rather complex machinery (signalling and recognition) being packed in the same gene. This is a clear example that both signalling and recognition can be achieved by one simple trait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galapagos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>galapagos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks for the good read as usual, and make sure someone commented on the clever photoshop. I chuckled. Keep it up!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for the good read as usual, and make sure someone commented on the clever photoshop. I chuckled. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Yong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>Thanks nitpickers one and all.
Arensb - just one detail: I think the sticky protein sticks to another molecule on the cell wall rather than itself. I think the point is that if two cells are sticking to each other with the protein, the bond between them is stronger than if just one cell was doing it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks nitpickers one and all.<br />
Arensb &#8211; just one detail: I think the sticky protein sticks to another molecule on the cell wall rather than itself. I think the point is that if two cells are sticking to each other with the protein, the bond between them is stronger than if just one cell was doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Another nit to pick: &quot;Smukalla put the different strains through the ringer&quot; should read &quot;...through the wringer&quot;. I believe this refers to old-style clothes wringers, which pressed clothes between two rollers to squeeze out the water after they had been laundered.
Other than that, it&#039;s an interesting result. While reading the post, I was wondering how a single gene could cause such &quot;green beard&quot; behavior, and imagined a protein sticking out of the cell wall, with an end that sticks well to other copies of itself. And lo and behold, I was right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another nit to pick: &#8220;Smukalla put the different strains through the ringer&#8221; should read &#8220;&#8230;through the wringer&#8221;. I believe this refers to old-style clothes wringers, which pressed clothes between two rollers to squeeze out the water after they had been laundered.<br />
Other than that, it&#8217;s an interesting result. While reading the post, I was wondering how a single gene could cause such &#8220;green beard&#8221; behavior, and imagined a protein sticking out of the cell wall, with an end that sticks well to other copies of itself. And lo and behold, I was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert V Sobczak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert V Sobczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>Cooperation is a tricky word ... we struggle as much with the language as we do with the science.  Language is sometimes a blunter instrument that we like to admit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooperation is a tricky word &#8230; we struggle as much with the language as we do with the science.  Language is sometimes a blunter instrument that we like to admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>Microbes can certainly cooperate, but sticking to other cells may not qualify as cooperation, if any benefits to OTHER cells are unselected side-effects.  West et al. have defined cooperation as &quot;a behaviour which provides a benefit to another individual (recipient), AND which is selected for because of its beneficial effect on the recipient.&quot;  This sounds like it could be more of a &quot;selfish herd&quot; effect; see John Dennehy&#039;s blog of a few months ago on the classic paper by that name.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microbes can certainly cooperate, but sticking to other cells may not qualify as cooperation, if any benefits to OTHER cells are unselected side-effects.  West et al. have defined cooperation as &#8220;a behaviour which provides a benefit to another individual (recipient), AND which is selected for because of its beneficial effect on the recipient.&#8221;  This sounds like it could be more of a &#8220;selfish herd&#8221; effect; see John Dennehy&#8217;s blog of a few months ago on the classic paper by that name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>So FLO1 positive cells stick together, teaching us nice things about evolution, AND we get optimized beer?
This is the most important science article I will read this week.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So FLO1 positive cells stick together, teaching us nice things about evolution, AND we get optimized beer?<br />
This is the most important science article I will read this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/11/14/green-beards-flocs-of-yeast-and-the-evolution-of-cooperation/#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>correction
&quot;Brewers add oxygen to their fermented brew&quot; should read
&quot;Brewers add oxygen to their unfermented brew&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction<br />
&#8220;Brewers add oxygen to their fermented brew&#8221; should read<br />
&#8220;Brewers add oxygen to their unfermented brew&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
