DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« An interview with David Attenborough
Not Exactly Rocket Science Review of 2008 »

Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchIn the twilit waters of the deep ocean, beneath about 1000m of water, swims the brownsnout spookfish (Dolichopteryx longipes). Like many other deep-sea fish, the spookfish is adapted to make the most of what little light penetrates to these depths, but it does so with some of the strangest eyes in the animal kingdom.

For a start, each eye is split into two connected parts, so the animal looks like it actually has four. One half points upwards and gives the spookfish a view of the ocean above. The other points downwards into the abyss below and it’s this half that makes the spookfish unique. The eyes of all other back-boned animals use a lens to divert the path of incoming light and focus it onto a specific point of the retina. But the spookfish’s downward-facing eye uses mirrors instead, forgoing a lens in favour of hundreds of tiny crystals that collect and focus light.

This bizarre animal was first described 120 years ago, but no one had discovered its reflective eyes until now because a live animal had never been caught. Hans-Joachim Wagner from Tubingen University changed all of that by netting a live specimen off the Pacific island of Tonga.

The spookfish’s eyes are similar in structure to many other fish that swim in the ocean’s twilight zone, where darkness is heavy but not quite total. The main part of each eye is tube-shaped and points to the surface, like a vertically mounted telescope. In photos A and B below, this upward-facing half has a yellow-orange shine because the camera’s flash has bounced off a reflective layer at the back of the eye.

Spookfish.jpg

This shape allows the spookfish to collect as much light as possible from above and spot the silhouette of animals swimming over it. But in doing so, it sacrifices the ability to spot other sources of light around it, especially bioluminescence – light given off by other deep-sea creatures.

To detect that, the spookfish has outgrowths on the side of its eyes that point downwards. The tops of these look black in photos A and B and the bottoms have a red eyeshine in photo C, taken from below the animal. These two parts of the eye – outer and inner – may look distinct, but they are categorically the same structure, united by a common retina.

Spookfish-eye.jpg

Other deep-sea fish have similar outgrowths but without a lens to focus the gathered light, they usually provide a blurry image at best. But the spookfish doesn’t need a lens – light entering its outer eye hits a mirror, made of stacks of crystals. The stacks sit roughly parallel to one another, but their angle changes over the surface of the mirror, giving it an overall concave shape.

Wagner used a computer simulation to show that mirror’s curve is perfect for focusing reflected light onto the fish’s retina. It provides the animal with sharp images of what’s below it, from straight downwards to about 50 degrees in either direction. Wagner thinks that the spookfish could even shift the position of its mirror, moving it away from the retina to focus on closer objects, just as humans can alter the shape of our lenses.

Spookfish-eye-reflections.jpg

Many groups of animals use reflective surfaces to help them form images, but usually, these sit behind the retina and reflect light that has passed through it. This layer – the tapetum – makes the eye more sensitive and is the reason why many animal eyes seem to glow in the dark. But in the spookfish, the mirror sits in front of the retina and its jobs is to focus, not to sensitise.

The fact that the spookfish is a back-boned animal – a vertebrate – makes its eye that much more special. Inverterbrates have a wide variety of eye designs, but vertebrates, from fish to humans, rely on just the one. The spookfish is the exception and the mirrored half of its eyes could even trump the traditional, upward-facing model. By reflecting light, rather than refracting it, these outer eyes could produce brighter images with higher contrasts that lens-carrying eyes normally would. That must give the fish a great advantage in the deep sea, where the ability to spot even the dimmest and briefest of lights can mean the difference between eating and being eaten.

Update: If that last sentence looks familiar to anyone, it’s because it was widely plagiarised. 

Preference: H WAGNER, R DOUGLAS, T FRANK, N ROBERTS, J PARTRIDGE (2008). A Novel Vertebrate Eye Using Both Refractive and Reflective Optics Current Biology DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.061


The amazing ways in which animals see the world

<p>In the animal kingdom, eyes have evolved dozens of times. We’re familiar with the camera-style eyes in our own heads, and the weird compound eyes of insects, but there are far weirder ones out there. Scientists are discovering new structures and adaptations all the time. There are eyes with mirrors, eyes with optical fibres, and eyes with bifocal lenses. There are eyes that see in the dark, move around heads, or go into sleep mode. <span> </span>There are even eyes made of rock. This slideshow will take you on a tour of some of these recent eye-opening discoveries.</p><p>Eyes don’t even have to be organic. While most animal lenses are made of proteins, the fuzzy chiton – an armoured relative of snails and other molluscs – has <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/14/chitons-see-with-eyes-made-of-rock/">lenses made of rock</a>. The lenses are made of aragonite, a type of limestone and the same stuff that the chiton’s shell is made of. These rocky eyes give the chiton a view that’s a thousand times fuzzier than ours, but that’s still good enough to see passing predators. The eyes also erode as the chiton ages, which might explain why it has more than a hundred of them. <span> </span></p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Chitons see with eyes made of rock" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/14/chitons-see-with-eyes-made-of-rock/">Chitons see with eyes made of rock</a></p><p>Benjamin Franklin is credited with inventing bifocal glasses. These allow wearers to focus on both far and near objects by looking through different parts of the lens. But such lenses have been around for millions of years, on the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/29/the-beetle-with-bifocal-eyes/">nightmarish face of the sunburst diving beetle</a>. The beetle’s larva has six pairs of eyes, and the front set is unique in the animal kingdom. Each one has one lens and two retinas, one sitting behind and slightly below the other. The lens manages to focus sharp images onto both of them, so the beetle can see near and far objects at the same time, with equal sharpness. Its bifocal lens gives it two eyes for the price of one.</p>
<p><strong>Read more:</strong> <a title="Permanent Link: The beetle with bifocal eyes" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/29/the-beetle-with-bifocal-eyes/">The beetle with bifocal eyes</a></p><p>In the deep ocean, the brownsnout spookfish can look up and down at the same time, with some of the animal kingdom’s strangest eyes. Each one is split into two connected parts, so it looks like the spookfish has four eyes. One half points up and the other points down, allowing the fish to look at both sky and abyss simultaneously. The downward eye is unique. Unlike the eyes of all other back-boned animals, which use a lens to focus light, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/12/30/spookfish-eye-uses-mirrors-instead-of-a-lens/">this one uses mirrors.</a> It uses hundreds of tiny crystals, arranged in a curved shape, to collect and focus light.</p>
<p>By reflecting light, rather than refracting it, these outer eyes could produce brighter images with higher contrasts that lens-carrying eyes normally would. That must give the fish a great advantage in the deep sea, where the ability to spot even the dimmest and briefest of lights can mean the difference between eating and being eaten.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/12/30/spookfish-eye-uses-mirrors-instead-of-a-lens/">Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens</a></p><p>The box jellyfish isn’t just a simple blob of goo. It’s an active predator that hunts with 24 eyes. These are clustered into four groups of six. In each cluster, four eyes are simple pits or slits that sense the presence of light. The other two actually see images and they’re remarkably similar to our eyes. They have their own lenses, retinas and corneas, and they’re <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/16/jellyfish-and-human-eyes-assembled-using-similar-genetic-building-blocks/">even made using very similar genes</a>. Even though we’re separated by millions of years of evolution, box jellyfish and back-boned animals have evolved eyes by independently recruiting the same building blocks.</p>
<p>The eye clusters are weighed down by heavy crystals so they're always upright, even if the jellyfish is swimming upside-down. This gives the animal <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/28/why-box-jellyfish-always-have-four-eyes-on-the-sky/">a perpetual view of the sky</a>, which allows it to stay close to the mangrove forests where its prey lives.</p>
<p>(<em>Photos by Anders Garm</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Jellyfish and human eyes assembled using similar genetic building blocks" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/16/jellyfish-and-human-eyes-assembled-using-similar-genetic-building-blocks/">Jellyfish and human eyes assembled using similar genetic building blocks</a></p><p>Mantis shrimps have the arguably the most incredible eyes of any animal. Each eye has three areas that can independently focus on objects, which means that a single mantis shrimp eye has “trinocular vision”. Our eyes have receptors that are tuned to three colours; those of mantis shrimps are tuned to at least twelve. And they can tune individual light-sensitive cells to local light levels.</p>
<p>Mantis shrimps can even see a special type of light – ‘circularly polarised light’ – <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/03/21/mantis-shrimps-have-a-unique-way-of-seeing" target="_blank">that no other animal can</a>. This ability allows them to send secret messages, produced by circularly polarised light reflecting off different parts of their shell. The ability hinges on a structure in their eyes that’s <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/10/25/mantis-shrimp-eyes-outclass-dvd-players-inspire-new-technology/">similar to technology found in our CD and DVD players</a>. The mantis shrimp’s biological engineering completely outclasses our man-made efforts; if we could duplicate it, we could have the basis of tomorrow’s multimedia players and hard drives.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Mantis shrimps have a unique way of seeing" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/03/21/mantis-shrimps-have-a-unique-way-of-seeing/">Mantis shrimps have a unique way of seeing</a>; <a title="Permanent Link: Mantis shrimp eyes outclass DVD players, inspire new technology" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/10/25/mantis-shrimp-eyes-outclass-dvd-players-inspire-new-technology/">Mantis shrimp eyes outclass DVD players, inspire new technology</a></p><p>When we go to sleep at night, we close our eyes to stop any errant light from disturbing our slumber. But the larvae of zebrafish go one further. They <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/09/pocket-science-chameleons-hunt-with-cold-proof-tongues-and-zebrafish-babies-go-blind-at-night/">shut down their eyes entirely at night</a>, becoming temporarily blind. Their vision only returns when daylight does. Energy is precious to the baby fish and eyes are gas-guzzling appliances, even when they’re set to standby. It makes sense to just shut them off instead.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Pocket Science – chameleons hunt with cold-proof tongues and zebrafish babies go blind at night" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/09/pocket-science-chameleons-hunt-with-cold-proof-tongues-and-zebrafish-babies-go-blind-at-night/">Pocket Science –zebrafish babies go blind at night</a></p><p>Even our own familiar eyes have hidden surprises. In 2009, scientists found that we’re all <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/02/08/living-optic-fibres-bypass-the-retinas-incompetent-design/">carrying living optic fibres called Muller cells</a>. These cells help to get round a structural problem in our eyes, where the light-sensing cells of the retina lie behind a tangled mass of nerves and blood vessels. It’s a bit like designing a camera, and sticking the wiring in front of the lens. Light gets through the mess inside the long, cylindrical Muller cells. It reflects down the cell, much like in an optic fibre, to hit the light-sensing cells on the other side. (<em>Image by <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_left_eye-8.jpg">Elyzhium</a></em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Living optic fibres bypass the retina’s incompetent design" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/02/08/living-optic-fibres-bypass-the-retinas-incompetent-design/">Living optic fibres bypass the retina’s incompetent design</a></p><p>Many mammals have evolved eyes that can see in the dark. That involves more than just becoming bigger. Their eyes have more light-sensitive rod cells, and these cells have changed at a microscopic level. They have converted the nucleus at the middle of each cell <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/04/21/nocturnal-mammals-see-in-dark-by-turning-displaced-dna-into-lenses/">into a light-collecting lens</a>.</p>
<p>In almost all complex cells, DNA is tightly packed around the edge of the nucleus but lightly packed towards its middle. But in the rod cells of nocturnal mammals, it’s the other way round. This inverted arrangement collects light that hits the rod cells and funnels it through to the retina underneath. By moving its DNA around, each cell has become a little optic fibre.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Nocturnal mammals see in dark by turning displaced DNA into lenses" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/04/21/nocturnal-mammals-see-in-dark-by-turning-displaced-dna-into-lenses/">Nocturnal mammals see in dark by turning displaced DNA into lenses</a></p><p>Like many species that live in perpetual darkness, the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/10/05/cross-breeding-restores-sight-to-blind-cavefish/">blind cavefish has lost its eyes</a>. These fish have evolved from sighted ancestors <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/07/sleepless-in-mexico-%E2%80%93-three-cavefish-groups-independently-evolved-to-lose-sleep/">on several occasions in</a> different Mexican caves. Their eyes have degenerated over a million years of darkness, but their blindness can be easily reversed by a spot of clever breeding. Many genes govern the development of eyes, and different populations of cavefish have lost their vision by disrupting different eye genes. By breeding individuals from different caves, working genes from one parent can compensate for broken ones from another. The result: babies that can see. (<em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/skippy/75380086/sizes/z/in/photostream/">skpy</a></em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Cross-breeding restores sight to blind cavefish" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/10/05/cross-breeding-restores-sight-to-blind-cavefish/">Cross-breeding restores sight to blind cavefish</a></p><p>As babies, flatfishes like plaice and flounders look like every other fish. But as they grow up, one of their eyes moves to the other side of their heads. This allows the adults to lie flat on their sides without getting an eyeful of sand. The evolution of these grotesque fish is <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/07/09/early-flatfish-has-eye-thats-moved-halfway-across-its-head/">beautifully captured by a fossil called Heteronectes</a>. It’s a half-committed flatfish. One of its eyes has begun migrating to the other side of its head but hasn’t made it all the way – it stops at the midline. We couldn’t have wished for a better intermediate form – it’s half-way between the standard fish body plan and the distorted visages of flounders and soles.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Early flatfish has eye that’s moved halfway across its head" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/07/09/early-flatfish-has-eye-thats-moved-halfway-across-its-head/">Early flatfish has eye that’s moved halfway across its head</a></p><p>The Hawaiian bobtail squid creates its own light, using special organs filled with glowing bacteria. But these organs don’t just produce light – <a title="Permanent Link: Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/06/02/glowing-squid-use-bacterial-flashlights-that-double-as-an-extra-pair-of-eyes/">they sense it too</a>. They are loaded with proteins that can detect light, and they produce nervous signals in bright conditions. They can expand and contract like an iris to control how much light gets through. They’re covered with a thick, transparent tissue that acts like a “lens”. The light organs are effectively an extra set of primitive eyes. They are living, ‘seeing’ flashlights. (<strong><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; font-weight: normal;">Image by </span></em></strong><em>William Ormerod</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/06/02/glowing-squid-use-bacterial-flashlights-that-double-as-an-extra-pair-of-eyes/">Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”</a></p>
Share

December 30th, 2008 Tags: eye, lens, mirror, retina, spookfish
by Ed Yong in Animals, Evolution, Eye evolution, Fish | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

6 Responses to “Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens”

  1. 1.   nizam Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    great article!
    very informative, and nicely written.
    thanks! nice blog btw

  2. 2.   R Nebblesworth Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    Say, that’s a pretty intelligent design for an eye!

  3. 3.   Ed Yong Says:
    January 9th, 2009 at 2:24 am

    Hang on a minute – look at this BBC story on the same thing published a few weeks after this post.
    Look at the quote at the very end. Now compare that to the final sentence of this post. WTF?

  4. 4.   Ed Yong Says:
    January 9th, 2009 at 6:50 am

    Okay – someone did nick the line but it has been resolved

  5. 5.   Andries Says:
    October 9th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    Hello,
    For my class, I made a lesson about ‘the eye’. I also added an extra paragraph with different types of eye’s, containing a fish eye ( with a HUGE lense ) an an compound eye. It would be cool if i could put this one in it too, because this eye-type is so totally different from the ‘normal’ human eye.
    Does wagner et al has a site, or blog where I can ask him for permission to use this?
    kind regards
    Andries

  6. 6.   Dan Smith Says:
    April 28th, 2011 at 4:57 am

    Wonderful – set a particular problem, sea too deep for regular eyes, too shallow to just look for bioluminescence evolution responds with a refractor and an off-axis parabolic reflector in one. Does this suggest that bioluminesence arose after the successful mesopelagic fish had evolutionarily committed to their upward-pointing telescope eyes, like the panda’s thumb , redeploying a wrist bone to make an extra digit when the other digits have irrevocably become claws?
    Makes you wonder as well about the neurological processing of the the image from two sources. One would imagine that the retinas might have diverged to give different spectral and temporal responses.

    BTW I greatly enjoyed your talk in Manchester (FLS) – your enthusiasm is infectious. It was so refreshing to see someone talk with notes rather than mumble and wave at Powerpoint…

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • In a scalding spring, one species of microbe is becoming two
      • Will we ever…? My new column for the BBC
      • Huge set of fossil tracks preserves march of the ancient elephants
      • Flowers regenerated from 30,000-year-old frozen fruits, buried by ancient squirrels
      • Flies drink alcohol to medicate themselves against wasp infections
      • The blue whale – how I met the largest animal that has ever existed
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (18 February 2012)
      • My Sri Lankan adventure – a species list
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us