DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Chimpanzee collects ammo for “premeditated” tourist-stoning
Different neuron networks control fear of different threats »

Alcohol tastes and smells better to those who get their first sips in the womb

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchPregnant women are generally advised to avoid drinking alcohol and for good reason – exposing an unborn baby to alcohol can lead to a range of physical and mental problems from hyperactivity and learning problems to stunted growth, abnormal development of the head, and mental retardation.

But alcohol also has much subtler effects on a foetus. Some scientists have suggested that people who get their first taste of alcohol through their mother’s placenta are more likely to develop a taste for it in later life. This sleeper effect is a long-lasting one – exposure to alcohol in the womb has been linked to a higher risk of alcohol abuse at the much later age of 21. In this way, mums could be inadvertently passing down a liking for booze to their children as a pre-birthday present.

Now, Steven Youngentob from SUNY Upstate Medical University and Jon Glendinning from Columbia University have found out why this happens. By looking at boozing rats, they have found that those first foetal sips of alcohol make the demon drink both taste and smell better.

The duo raised several pregnant rats on diets of either chow, liquids or liquids that had been spiked with alcohol. The third group eventually had a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.15%, a level that would cause a typical human to slur, stagger or become moody.

When the females eventually gave birth, month-old pups born to boozy mothers were more likely to lick an alcohol-coated feeding tube than those whose mothers were tee-total. These rats had been born with more of a taste for booze.

Partly, this was because they tolerated its bitterness rather than because they found its sweet side more alluring. Compared to the tee-total rats, those that had experienced alcohol in the womb were more likely to lick tubes coated in quinine hydrochloride, a bitter-tasting chemical, but no more likely to feed from tubes covered in sweet sucrose. This tolerance for bitter tastes was directly related to their acceptance of booze.

But it wasn’t just that alcohol tasted better; it smelled more tempting too. Yougentoub and Glendinning placed rats in a special chamber designed to measure their body volume, and thus how strongly they were breathing. They found that rats born to binge-drinking mothers sniffed the air more intensely and frequently when the smell of alcohol was pumped in, but were no more responsive to the smell of fresh air.

The rats whose noses were most tickled by the scent of alcohol were then more likely to drink more of it when given the option later. Based on this, and previous experiments, Youngentoub and Glendinning believe that by drinking while pregnant, a mother rat can tune her child’s nervous system to the scent of alcohol. It’s not clear whether this happens because the babies develop a liking for the smell or because they find it less repellent, but the duo suggest that the first explanation fits better with earlier studies.

So rats that have tasted alcohol in the womb are more attracted by it in their adolescence because they find it more aromatic and more palatable. Using a bit of statistical wizardry, Youngentoub and Glendinning estimated that a more appealing taste accounts for about 29% of a young rat’s increased preference for alcohol, while the more pleasing smell accounts for 22%. Clearly then, there are other factors that make alcohol more acceptable in these rats, and identifying those should be a goal for future studies.

Obviously, this study focused on rats but the same principles may well explain why humans whose mothers drink while pregnant are more likely to develop alcohol disorders in their twenties. It fits well with existing research, which show that when pregnant rats or humans drink alcohol, some of it diffuses across the placenta and into the amniotic fluid cradling her baby. Studies in both species have found that the foetus not only senses this chemical but remembers it too.

It will be interesting to see if the same applies to other drugs, like tobacco or marijuana, and how these changes play out at a genetic level (or rather, an epigenetic one).

Reference: S. L. Youngentob, J. I. Glendinning (2009). Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809804106

More on epigenetics and inheritance of behaviour:

  • Child abuse permanently modifies stress genes in brains of suicide victims
  • Obesity amplifies across generations; can folate-rich diets stop it?
  • Ask an IVF baby: does smoking while pregnant lead to antisocial behaviour?

Subscribe to the feed

Share

March 9th, 2009 Tags: alcohol, epigenetic, foetus, maternal, mother, pregnancy, pregnant, rats, smell, taste
by Ed Yong in Drugs, Epigenetics, Medicine & health | 7 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

7 Responses to “Alcohol tastes and smells better to those who get their first sips in the womb”

  1. 1.   Noah Gray Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    I think the suggestion of an epigenetic component is an excellent idea…

  2. 2.   jay Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Probably part of evolution, many foods pre-exposed the young, especially humans where different cultures have widely differing diets.
    Perhaps this is a matter of much ado about nothing, many alcholics dislike the taste of alcohol (and go to great lengths to hide it in their preferred drinks) and many people who like the taste do not become alcoholic.

  3. 3.   Dennis Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:42 pm

    Science, is there nothing it can’t blame on mothers?

  4. 4.   Lilian Nattel Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    This could also explain the food preferences with internationally adopted babies who after adoption have a definite taste for the kinds of foods that come from their place of origin even though as babies (prior to adoption) they only ever had formula.

  5. 5.   jemand Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    those are huge concentrations. and, at those levels wouldn’t very strong physical effects be noticed? I believe in Europe pregnant women are not discouraged from drinking half a glass or a glass of wine a week… would any effects at all result from those concentrations?

  6. 6.   Stagyar zil Doggo Says:
    March 10th, 2009 at 4:36 am

    Isn’t it more likely that these rats are already chronic alcoholics? That their increased preference is for the high given by alcohol and they use smell and taste merely as a marker for the high? As jay said, preference for alcohol does not imply a preference for its taste/smell. Same for many other common substances of abuse. (Stinkbud anyone?)
    One way to control for this would be to try out an identically smelling and/or tasting chemical (does one exist?), which does not give a high and to see if the rats in question eventually lose their preference for it. Did the preference for quinine hydrochloride persist despite not getting a high from it (or anything else bitter) after a period long enough for them to unlearn the association of bitter taste with intoxication?

  7. 7.   Tsu Dho Nimh Says:
    March 10th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Some experiments in France used anise flavor in pregnant women – half were exposed to it during pregnancy and half weren’t.
    The prenatally exposed babies didn’t balk at their first taste of it, the unexposed ones did.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us