<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prehistoric carving is oldest known figurative art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/</link>
	<description>Dive into the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science news with award-winning writer Ed Yong. No previous experience required.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3915</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3915</guid>
		<description>Figurative? Maybe this artist was just... you know... bad at art...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figurative? Maybe this artist was just&#8230; you know&#8230; bad at art&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monado</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3914</link>
		<dc:creator>Monado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3914</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m revisiting this and it&#039;s such a nice summary I&#039;m going to link to it.
About clothing, as I recall the &quot;Venus of Willendorf&quot; has a nubbly head that a fabric expert has said represents knitting. And as soemone else said, this was probably preceded by wooden or leaf models.
The half-animal hybrids are even more interesting, in a way, as they are clearly products of imagination. Perhaps they represented gods or clan spirits? But to me they say, &quot;First ever science fiction!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m revisiting this and it&#8217;s such a nice summary I&#8217;m going to link to it.<br />
About clothing, as I recall the &#8220;Venus of Willendorf&#8221; has a nubbly head that a fabric expert has said represents knitting. And as soemone else said, this was probably preceded by wooden or leaf models.<br />
The half-animal hybrids are even more interesting, in a way, as they are clearly products of imagination. Perhaps they represented gods or clan spirits? But to me they say, &#8220;First ever science fiction!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Steinberger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3913</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Steinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3913</guid>
		<description>Thanks for changing the title, Ed. The comments on the sciencemag website are so disturbingly bad: people (and by people I mean men) seem to have swallowed evopsych hook line and sinker, and don&#039;t even realize how it distorts their worldview.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for changing the title, Ed. The comments on the sciencemag website are so disturbingly bad: people (and by people I mean men) seem to have swallowed evopsych hook line and sinker, and don&#8217;t even realize how it distorts their worldview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>chris y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In contrast to these exaggerated sexual features, her arms and legs are relatively small and her head has been left out entirely.&lt;/i&gt;
Huh. Objectification of women. No seriously, the evopsych crowd are going to have a field day with this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In contrast to these exaggerated sexual features, her arms and legs are relatively small and her head has been left out entirely.</i><br />
Huh. Objectification of women. No seriously, the evopsych crowd are going to have a field day with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Yong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3911</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3911</guid>
		<description>Right, it&#039;s been pointed out to me that the &quot;prehistoric pin-up&quot; headline is inappropriate and I agree. I&#039;ve changed it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, it&#8217;s been pointed out to me that the &#8220;prehistoric pin-up&#8221; headline is inappropriate and I agree. I&#8217;ve changed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian Nattel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3910</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilian Nattel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3910</guid>
		<description>Fascinating. But I think it&#039;s an open question as to where figurative art developed. This is a new find. Might there not be other objects elsewhere that simply haven&#039;t yet been found?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating. But I think it&#8217;s an open question as to where figurative art developed. This is a new find. Might there not be other objects elsewhere that simply haven&#8217;t yet been found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDeden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>DDeden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>Could the dolls/venuses have had exchangeable heads, like sticking an acorn or little apple onto the neck? (Compare to Native American corn cob dolls.) 35+ka for such careful sculpture surely must have been long preceded by other work, maybe it had been all wood carving, later discarded as fuelwood, or decomposing in soil. So many have pregnancy features, might they have been post-weaning pacifiers of some sort?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the dolls/venuses have had exchangeable heads, like sticking an acorn or little apple onto the neck? (Compare to Native American corn cob dolls.) 35+ka for such careful sculpture surely must have been long preceded by other work, maybe it had been all wood carving, later discarded as fuelwood, or decomposing in soil. So many have pregnancy features, might they have been post-weaning pacifiers of some sort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Miller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3908</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3908</guid>
		<description>Maybe these passed for ancient&#039;s man version of a &quot;Page 3&quot; girl. Hey, you said it was a European find! :-D
Seriously, though, this is pretty awesome. It means a strongly artistic culture was already prevalent way back then.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe these passed for ancient&#8217;s man version of a &#8220;Page 3&#8243; girl. Hey, you said it was a European find! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Seriously, though, this is pretty awesome. It means a strongly artistic culture was already prevalent way back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scicurious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/comment-page-1/#comment-3907</link>
		<dc:creator>Scicurious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/05/13/prehistoric-carving-is-oldest-known-figurative-art/#comment-3907</guid>
		<description>Great post, Ed!  Unfortunately, now that you mention it, all I can see is how it looks like a roast chicken.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Ed!  Unfortunately, now that you mention it, all I can see is how it looks like a roast chicken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-26 13:02:35 -->
