DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Venomous Komodo dragons kill prey with wound-and-poison tactics
Darwinius changes everything »

City mockingbirds can tell the difference between individual people

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchWhile the rapid expansion of human cities has been detrimental for most animals, some have found ways of exploiting these brave new worlds and learned to live with their prolific inhabitants. The Northern mockingbird is one such species. It’s very common in cities all over America’s east coast, where it frequently spends time around humans. But Douglas Levey from the University of Florida has found that its interactions with us are more complex than anyone would have guessed. 

The mockingbird has the remarkable ability to tell the difference between individual humans, regardless of the clothes they wear. After less than a minute, they can tell one person from another and adjust their responses according to the threat they pose to its nest. This ability suggests that these birds are both intelligent and very flexible in their behaviour – two traits that must surely stand them in good stead in the urban jungle.

It obviously benefits an animal to be able to distinguish between threatening and harmless species, but discriminating between individuals of the same species is a much more difficult task – just think about how difficult you would find it to tell the difference between two mockingbirds by eye.

Levey worked with 24 pairs of mockingbirds that had taken up residence on the university’s campus. Hundreds of people walk within five metres of their nests every day and elicit absolutely no reaction. To simulate a greater threat, Levey asked one of his colleagues to approach the nests of birds with fresh clutches, and touch their rim for 15 seconds. When faced with such intrusion, mockingbirds will typically react by rallying from the nest, making alarm calls and diving aggressively at the trespasser.

Initially, the same intruder approached the nest for four days in a row, each time wearing different clothes. Despite their changing garments, the birds seemed to recognise them and reacted more aggressively as the days went by. They flew from the nest when the human was further away, they make more alarm calls and they were more likely to attack.

That could simply reflect a generally rising state of panic, but the events of the fifth day put paid to that idea. At that point, the intruders swapped and a different person approached the nest in exactly the same way. Faced with this new intruder, the birds reduced the degree of their alarm to the level of the first day. To Levey, this simple experiment clearly shows that the mockingbirds quickly learned to recognise people who approached their nest.

Many animals can tell the difference between individuals of their own species. But, anecdotes aside, there are relatively few reports of them pulling off the same trick with members of other species. Chimps can apparently do it from photos, prairie dogs from sound and cattle from smell. And animals from pigeons to honeybees have shown some skill in distinguishing between photos of humans in experimental conditions. But the mockingbirds in Levey’s study passed a very realistic and difficult test – they had to tell one individual apart from thousands of others, all of whom changed their appearance on a daily basis.

They also did it with incredible speed. Within just two approaches by the human intruder, each one lasting just 30 seconds, the birds started behaving more aggressively. This means that a mockingbird can learn to recognise a new individual within less than a minute. In virtually all studies where other animals have learned to identify or classify individuals of other species, they have required 10-1000 times more training.

The fact that a songbird like the mockingbird can do this strongly suggests that other birds can do the same. In particular, the intelligentsia of the bird world – crows, jays and parrots – should be all too capable of distinguishing between individual humans.

If mockingbirds can tell the difference between individual humans, it’s likely that they can do the same for individual cats, raccoons and other egg thieves. Indeed, it will be interesting to see if rural mockingbirds have the same ability. But Levey doesn’t think that the urban populations have evolved a specific ability to tell humans apart. Rather, he suggests that mockingbirds are generally perceptive and learn quickly, traits that allowed them to colonise urban environments. Moving from rural areas to the big, bad city poses many unfamiliar challenges, including many new predators intending to kill a mockingbird.

Reference: Levey, D., Londono, G., Ungvari-Martin, J., Hiersoux, M., Jankowski, J., Poulsen, J., Stracey, C., & Robinson, S. (2009). Urban mockingbirds quickly learn to identify individual humans Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811422106; images by Calibas and Mdf

More on bird brains:

  • Alex the parrot and Snowball the cockatoo show that birds can dance
  • Sparrows solve problems more quickly in larger groups
  • Eavesdropping songbirds get predator intel from overheard calls
  • Bird-brained jays can plan for the future

Twitter.jpg RSS.jpg

Share

May 19th, 2009 Tags: city, humans, individuals, mockingbird, recognise, urban
by Ed Yong in Animal behaviour, Animal intelligence, Animals, Birds | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

15 Responses to “City mockingbirds can tell the difference between individual people”

  1. 1.   Jefrir Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    I’m pretty sure blackbirds can do the same thing. The ones in the garden will hang around if my mum (who feeds them) comes out, but fly away from anyone else. As I look pretty similar to my mum, and it doesn’t seem to make a difference whether I’m carrying bird food or not, it seems that they’re recognising an individual.

  2. 2.   psycho Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    “just think about how difficult you would find it to tell the difference between two mockingbirds by eye”
    But birds are much smaller, there isnt that much difference (as in case of humans) when it comes to one specie, I believe.
    However, in case of bigger animals, such as elephants, I do wonder what’s the cause.
    Are elephants more similar to each other than humans are?
    Or is it because of adaptation?
    Or is it both?
    (btw, when I was a child, I remember having problem to tell difference between people of other races – that’s plus for the ‘adaption’ point)

  3. 3.   deang Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    A mockingbird attacked me a couple of days ago here in Austin, TX. I was walking past some young Retama trees (Parkinsonia aculeata) and suddenly there was this mockingbird hovering by my shoulder and rushing at my arm, sort of head-butting me. It sounds kind of funny but it actually scared me a little. The bird did it repeatedly for about a block before flying back to the Retamas. I rarely walk that way and I don’t bother birds, but it is fledging season, so I’m guessing there must have been a baby mockingbird in those trees. The mockingbirds by my home have a chick, too, but they never bother me.

  4. 4.   John Wall Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    It wouldn’t be adaptive to raise an alarm for non-threatening individuals. It’s risky to bring attention to yourself. I hope the experimenters didn’t unwittingly bring trouble to the birds. And speaking of alarms, we had a mockingbird one year that would mimic a car alarm, right down to the beep at the end.

  5. 5.   humorix Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    It is all opposite with women! (when they touch has their small nest)

  6. 6.   JJ Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    Admit it, the research project and the resulting article were all just to build up to the “To Kill a Mockingbird” reference.

  7. 7.   Ed Yong Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    Got me. I’m just glad that ten years of putting my money into funding mockingbird-related projects has paid off at last.

  8. 8.   GodlessHeathen Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    I have a Western Scrub-Jay friend who definitely picks me out from the crowd. I’m continually amazed that he knows it’s me whether I’m riding my bicycle or on foot, wearing a bike helmet or not, with another person or alone. He recognizes me and flies toward me from up to 200′ away. The sidewalk/bike path is continually full of pedestrians and cyclists, so I often wave at him to get his attention. However, many times I just turn and notice him flying alongside my bike as I ride to our peanut-feeding spot. I know that he does not visit people randomly and I can only guess how he instantly recognizes me among the hundreds of people he sees each day.

  9. 9.   Markk Says:
    May 20th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Does the study distinguish between recognition of individual people or specific actions? In other words are the birds reacting to specific actions that anyone could do or specific people? This is hard to tell apart, the people approaching the nest may make certain gestures or motions, turning and so on. This could be accounted for, eg, by having different people try to mimic the nest approachers actions. Was that done?

  10. 10.   K. Signal Eingang Says:
    May 20th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    I recall a story some time ago where a school bus driver in Ohio (or maybe it was Indiana?) had taken to feeding the local crows on her lunch break. The crows not only recognized her but came to recognize her bus as well – she nearly lost her job when the birds started ripping windshield wipers and various rubber seals off the bus out of boredom as they waited for her to come out and take her break.

  11. 11.   CatBallou Says:
    May 23rd, 2009 at 2:50 am

    I love you, Ed, but “rapid expansion …have been detrimental”? Really?

  12. 12.   april Says:
    May 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    How many different kinds of mickingbirds are there.whats the different types and what are there distinctions?

  13. 13.   Andy Says:
    August 10th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Broadly speaking there are 2 types of mocking birds. One is the Northern Mockingbird, as mentioned in the article and the rest can be classified as ‘Others’. The only obvious distinction is all of them are 4 times more intelligent then you except for the one mentioned in the article … which is just twice as intelligent as you.

  14. 14.   sugarpeepsez Says:
    June 15th, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    They might be able to distinguish individual humans, but a male mockingbird in my yard could not recognise himself in a mirror, specifically, the side mirror of our car, because he spent hours fighting with his own reflection.

  15. 15.   Kay Lee Says:
    June 22nd, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    There is a Mockingbird nest in one of my trees and there is a male and a female guarding the nest. I have been attacked repeatedly for a couople of weeks now. The interesting part is that only one of them attacks. The other flies along the area but does not attack. I have not been able to harvest vegetables or pull weeds without continous attacks from, I am assuming ,the female. She visciously attacks me with only seconds in between. Something must have happened to the female as she no longer is around. the male is continueing to feed the young and flies out of the nest when I am around. He just chirps and perches close to where I am, but does not attack. I wonder if I am right that the female is the more aggresive one and that the male gives her support without attacking. It is interesting to see that one takes over taking care of their young, as a human would, in the absence of the partner,.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

      • edyong209: "The lack of transparency, sweeping generalizations & unsupported conclusions shld've raised red flags at Wired." http://t.co/xz9GLMoG
      • edyong209: @criener <wistful sigh>
      • edyong209: @maggiekb1 Fond of fibre, reticent to breed?
      • edyong209: CONGRATS! RT @DaveMosher: Congrats to newlyweds @virginiahughes and @randalvegter! WOO! @ Battery Gardens Restaurant http://t.co/jZK097uq
      • edyong209: Can old-school drug discovery techniques solve the critiical lack of new antibiotics? http://t.co/rZfpcFMC #allthishashappenedbefore
      • edyong209: Irises, it turns out, change with age. Which is bad news for iris scanners. http://t.co/eALOSBu5
    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us