DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« DNA sculpture and origami – a meeting of art and nanotechnology
Altruistic chimpanzees clearly help each other out »

From day to night – a lesson in eye evolution with the owl monkey

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchIn the forests of South America lives the unusual but aptly named owl monkey, or douroucouli. You could probably guess by looking at its large round eyes that it’s nocturnal, and indeed, it is the only monkey to be mostly active at night. But its eyes have many adaptations for such a lifestyle, beyond a large size.

The owl monkey’s retinas are 50% larger than those of a day-living monkey of similar size, like the brown capuchin. The proportions of different cells in their retina are also different. Owl monkeys have relatively few cone cells, which are responsible for colour vision and fewer ganglion cells, which process the signals from the cones. In contrast, they have many more rod cells, which are far more sensitive than cones and function best in low light, and rod bipolar cells, which transmit signals from the rods.

This is an eye that has sacrificed sharpness and colour for sensitivity. Nocturnal mammals the world over have developed a very similar suite of adaptations and according to Michael Dyer and Rodrigo Martins, these may be easier to evolve than you might think.

All of the cells in the retina are produced by a small group of stem cells called retinal progenitor cells (RPCs). As an embryo grows, its RPCs go through cycles of division, still maintaining their “stemness”. At some point, they leave this cycle and commit to becoming one of the various types of retinal cells. The fate they choose depends on when they leave the cycle. Those that are “born” early turn into cells that are important for daylight vision, such as cones and ganglions. Those that exit late become cells that play a greater role in night-vision, including rods and their bipolar cells.

This quirk of organisation means that the retina’s cells are always produced in a very specific order, with those that grant good night-vision cells appearing later. The upshot is that the owl monkey has been able to adapt its retina to see in the dark simply by tweaking the timing of its development. In its retinas, more RPCs commit to a particular fate later on in their cycle, producing fewer of the earlier types of cells and many more of the later ones. The result: an extra-sensitive retina with a complement of cells perfectly suited for nocturnal living, all triggered by a single change during development.  

The eyes of the owl monkey hammer home an increasingly familiar message – you can get big results by very subtly tweaking the way that bodies develop, without any need for large-scale tinkering. Even the eye, an exceptionally complex organ, can be altered in a coordinated way, simply by shifting the timing of its development. It’s why the owl monkey, in a relatively short space of evolutionary time, has converted the daylight-loving eyes of its ancestor into a nocturnal model.

More and more, evolutionary biologists are discovering examples where evolution has squeezed out a tremendous amount of variation by tinkering with the timing of development. Snakes, for example, have hundreds of vertebrae, while mice have just 50 and humans, just 33. Each vertebra is formed from an embryonic structure called a somite and there’s an internal clock that governs how quickly these somites are formed. In snake embryos, this clock ticks into overdrive so that it develops a hefty collection of smaller somites. That leads to more vertebrae. The owl monkey’s super-sensitive retinas are just another example of this phenomenon.

Dyer and Martins, from the St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, studied the RPCs of owl monkey and capuchin foetuses, as their retinas developed. They kept an eye on these cells using a mildly radioactive chemical called bromodeoxyuridine, which gets incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells. This marker revealed that an owl monkey’s RPCs start producing the various cells of its retina much later (and over a shorter period of time) than those of a capuchin’s. This delay means that the owl monkey produces fewer of the earliest cells in the sequence and more of the later types, including the rods that are so vital for night-vision.

The shift in timing could well explain another feature of the owl monkey eye that sets it apart from other monkeys and apes. It lacks a fovea, a spot at the centre of human retinas where our vision is sharpest, where cone cells are abundant and where rods are virtually absent. But as the owl monkey’s retina develops, its dearth of cones and its surplus of rods mean that this focal point never forms. Indeed, the owl monkey has little need for a fovea – acuity is a minor issue when one has to worry about sensing any light at all.

The owl monkey evolved from diurnal ancestors around 15 million years ago. During this relatively short time, it has developed most of the adaptations that other nocturnal mammals have. Its eyes have become bigger and it has lost the third cone cell that other monkeys and apes use to detect light at the red end of the spectrum. But all of its other adaptations – more rods, fewer cones, no fovea – could well be the result of a single change to its development.

It’s a wonderfully elegant system because it means that the proportions of all types of cells in the retina can be adjusted in a coordinated way. Dyer and Martin point out that the alternative explanation – that the fate of each type of cell is controlled individually – isn’t ruled out by their work, but is “an unlikely and rather cumbersome possibility”. 

But why should the retina’s development go through such an orderly sequence, where diurnal and nocturnal features are so conveniently grouped? Some will no doubt choose to read too much into this, but Dyer and Martins think that the advantages of such organisation are “not hard to discern”.

All primates, owl monkeys included, come from a long line of animals that have crossed over from diurnal to nocturnal living and back again, many times over.  This ecological flip-flopping would have filtered out programmes of development that make it easier to cross between the two ways of life. Such programme would produce cells that are relevant to each one at different times, and ensure that boosting one group downplays the other – exactly the system found in mammalian retinas.

Reference: Dyer, M., Martins, R., da Silva Filho, M., Muniz, J., Silveira, L., Cepko, C., & Finlay, B. (2009). Developmental sources of conservation and variation in the evolution of the primate eye Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901484106


The amazing ways in which animals see the world

<p>In the animal kingdom, eyes have evolved dozens of times. We’re familiar with the camera-style eyes in our own heads, and the weird compound eyes of insects, but there are far weirder ones out there. Scientists are discovering new structures and adaptations all the time. There are eyes with mirrors, eyes with optical fibres, and eyes with bifocal lenses. There are eyes that see in the dark, move around heads, or go into sleep mode. <span> </span>There are even eyes made of rock. This slideshow will take you on a tour of some of these recent eye-opening discoveries.</p><p>Eyes don’t even have to be organic. While most animal lenses are made of proteins, the fuzzy chiton – an armoured relative of snails and other molluscs – has <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/14/chitons-see-with-eyes-made-of-rock/">lenses made of rock</a>. The lenses are made of aragonite, a type of limestone and the same stuff that the chiton’s shell is made of. These rocky eyes give the chiton a view that’s a thousand times fuzzier than ours, but that’s still good enough to see passing predators. The eyes also erode as the chiton ages, which might explain why it has more than a hundred of them. <span> </span></p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Chitons see with eyes made of rock" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/14/chitons-see-with-eyes-made-of-rock/">Chitons see with eyes made of rock</a></p><p>Benjamin Franklin is credited with inventing bifocal glasses. These allow wearers to focus on both far and near objects by looking through different parts of the lens. But such lenses have been around for millions of years, on the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/29/the-beetle-with-bifocal-eyes/">nightmarish face of the sunburst diving beetle</a>. The beetle’s larva has six pairs of eyes, and the front set is unique in the animal kingdom. Each one has one lens and two retinas, one sitting behind and slightly below the other. The lens manages to focus sharp images onto both of them, so the beetle can see near and far objects at the same time, with equal sharpness. Its bifocal lens gives it two eyes for the price of one.</p>
<p><strong>Read more:</strong> <a title="Permanent Link: The beetle with bifocal eyes" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/29/the-beetle-with-bifocal-eyes/">The beetle with bifocal eyes</a></p><p>In the deep ocean, the brownsnout spookfish can look up and down at the same time, with some of the animal kingdom’s strangest eyes. Each one is split into two connected parts, so it looks like the spookfish has four eyes. One half points up and the other points down, allowing the fish to look at both sky and abyss simultaneously. The downward eye is unique. Unlike the eyes of all other back-boned animals, which use a lens to focus light, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/12/30/spookfish-eye-uses-mirrors-instead-of-a-lens/">this one uses mirrors.</a> It uses hundreds of tiny crystals, arranged in a curved shape, to collect and focus light.</p>
<p>By reflecting light, rather than refracting it, these outer eyes could produce brighter images with higher contrasts that lens-carrying eyes normally would. That must give the fish a great advantage in the deep sea, where the ability to spot even the dimmest and briefest of lights can mean the difference between eating and being eaten.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/12/30/spookfish-eye-uses-mirrors-instead-of-a-lens/">Spookfish eye uses mirrors instead of a lens</a></p><p>The box jellyfish isn’t just a simple blob of goo. It’s an active predator that hunts with 24 eyes. These are clustered into four groups of six. In each cluster, four eyes are simple pits or slits that sense the presence of light. The other two actually see images and they’re remarkably similar to our eyes. They have their own lenses, retinas and corneas, and they’re <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/16/jellyfish-and-human-eyes-assembled-using-similar-genetic-building-blocks/">even made using very similar genes</a>. Even though we’re separated by millions of years of evolution, box jellyfish and back-boned animals have evolved eyes by independently recruiting the same building blocks.</p>
<p>The eye clusters are weighed down by heavy crystals so they're always upright, even if the jellyfish is swimming upside-down. This gives the animal <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/28/why-box-jellyfish-always-have-four-eyes-on-the-sky/">a perpetual view of the sky</a>, which allows it to stay close to the mangrove forests where its prey lives.</p>
<p>(<em>Photos by Anders Garm</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Jellyfish and human eyes assembled using similar genetic building blocks" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/16/jellyfish-and-human-eyes-assembled-using-similar-genetic-building-blocks/">Jellyfish and human eyes assembled using similar genetic building blocks</a></p><p>Mantis shrimps have the arguably the most incredible eyes of any animal. Each eye has three areas that can independently focus on objects, which means that a single mantis shrimp eye has “trinocular vision”. Our eyes have receptors that are tuned to three colours; those of mantis shrimps are tuned to at least twelve. And they can tune individual light-sensitive cells to local light levels.</p>
<p>Mantis shrimps can even see a special type of light – ‘circularly polarised light’ – <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/03/21/mantis-shrimps-have-a-unique-way-of-seeing" target="_blank">that no other animal can</a>. This ability allows them to send secret messages, produced by circularly polarised light reflecting off different parts of their shell. The ability hinges on a structure in their eyes that’s <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/10/25/mantis-shrimp-eyes-outclass-dvd-players-inspire-new-technology/">similar to technology found in our CD and DVD players</a>. The mantis shrimp’s biological engineering completely outclasses our man-made efforts; if we could duplicate it, we could have the basis of tomorrow’s multimedia players and hard drives.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Mantis shrimps have a unique way of seeing" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/03/21/mantis-shrimps-have-a-unique-way-of-seeing/">Mantis shrimps have a unique way of seeing</a>; <a title="Permanent Link: Mantis shrimp eyes outclass DVD players, inspire new technology" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/10/25/mantis-shrimp-eyes-outclass-dvd-players-inspire-new-technology/">Mantis shrimp eyes outclass DVD players, inspire new technology</a></p><p>When we go to sleep at night, we close our eyes to stop any errant light from disturbing our slumber. But the larvae of zebrafish go one further. They <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/09/pocket-science-chameleons-hunt-with-cold-proof-tongues-and-zebrafish-babies-go-blind-at-night/">shut down their eyes entirely at night</a>, becoming temporarily blind. Their vision only returns when daylight does. Energy is precious to the baby fish and eyes are gas-guzzling appliances, even when they’re set to standby. It makes sense to just shut them off instead.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Pocket Science – chameleons hunt with cold-proof tongues and zebrafish babies go blind at night" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/09/pocket-science-chameleons-hunt-with-cold-proof-tongues-and-zebrafish-babies-go-blind-at-night/">Pocket Science –zebrafish babies go blind at night</a></p><p>Even our own familiar eyes have hidden surprises. In 2009, scientists found that we’re all <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/02/08/living-optic-fibres-bypass-the-retinas-incompetent-design/">carrying living optic fibres called Muller cells</a>. These cells help to get round a structural problem in our eyes, where the light-sensing cells of the retina lie behind a tangled mass of nerves and blood vessels. It’s a bit like designing a camera, and sticking the wiring in front of the lens. Light gets through the mess inside the long, cylindrical Muller cells. It reflects down the cell, much like in an optic fibre, to hit the light-sensing cells on the other side. (<em>Image by <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_left_eye-8.jpg">Elyzhium</a></em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Living optic fibres bypass the retina’s incompetent design" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/02/08/living-optic-fibres-bypass-the-retinas-incompetent-design/">Living optic fibres bypass the retina’s incompetent design</a></p><p>Many mammals have evolved eyes that can see in the dark. That involves more than just becoming bigger. Their eyes have more light-sensitive rod cells, and these cells have changed at a microscopic level. They have converted the nucleus at the middle of each cell <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/04/21/nocturnal-mammals-see-in-dark-by-turning-displaced-dna-into-lenses/">into a light-collecting lens</a>.</p>
<p>In almost all complex cells, DNA is tightly packed around the edge of the nucleus but lightly packed towards its middle. But in the rod cells of nocturnal mammals, it’s the other way round. This inverted arrangement collects light that hits the rod cells and funnels it through to the retina underneath. By moving its DNA around, each cell has become a little optic fibre.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Nocturnal mammals see in dark by turning displaced DNA into lenses" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/04/21/nocturnal-mammals-see-in-dark-by-turning-displaced-dna-into-lenses/">Nocturnal mammals see in dark by turning displaced DNA into lenses</a></p><p>Like many species that live in perpetual darkness, the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/10/05/cross-breeding-restores-sight-to-blind-cavefish/">blind cavefish has lost its eyes</a>. These fish have evolved from sighted ancestors <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/07/sleepless-in-mexico-%E2%80%93-three-cavefish-groups-independently-evolved-to-lose-sleep/">on several occasions in</a> different Mexican caves. Their eyes have degenerated over a million years of darkness, but their blindness can be easily reversed by a spot of clever breeding. Many genes govern the development of eyes, and different populations of cavefish have lost their vision by disrupting different eye genes. By breeding individuals from different caves, working genes from one parent can compensate for broken ones from another. The result: babies that can see. (<em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/skippy/75380086/sizes/z/in/photostream/">skpy</a></em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Cross-breeding restores sight to blind cavefish" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/10/05/cross-breeding-restores-sight-to-blind-cavefish/">Cross-breeding restores sight to blind cavefish</a></p><p>As babies, flatfishes like plaice and flounders look like every other fish. But as they grow up, one of their eyes moves to the other side of their heads. This allows the adults to lie flat on their sides without getting an eyeful of sand. The evolution of these grotesque fish is <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/07/09/early-flatfish-has-eye-thats-moved-halfway-across-its-head/">beautifully captured by a fossil called Heteronectes</a>. It’s a half-committed flatfish. One of its eyes has begun migrating to the other side of its head but hasn’t made it all the way – it stops at the midline. We couldn’t have wished for a better intermediate form – it’s half-way between the standard fish body plan and the distorted visages of flounders and soles.</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Early flatfish has eye that’s moved halfway across its head" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2008/07/09/early-flatfish-has-eye-thats-moved-halfway-across-its-head/">Early flatfish has eye that’s moved halfway across its head</a></p><p>The Hawaiian bobtail squid creates its own light, using special organs filled with glowing bacteria. But these organs don’t just produce light – <a title="Permanent Link: Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/06/02/glowing-squid-use-bacterial-flashlights-that-double-as-an-extra-pair-of-eyes/">they sense it too</a>. They are loaded with proteins that can detect light, and they produce nervous signals in bright conditions. They can expand and contract like an iris to control how much light gets through. They’re covered with a thick, transparent tissue that acts like a “lens”. The light organs are effectively an extra set of primitive eyes. They are living, ‘seeing’ flashlights. (<strong><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; font-weight: normal;">Image by </span></em></strong><em>William Ormerod</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Read more: </strong><a title="Permanent Link: Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/06/02/glowing-squid-use-bacterial-flashlights-that-double-as-an-extra-pair-of-eyes/">Glowing squid use bacterial flashlights that double as an extra pair of “eyes”</a></p>
Share

May 21st, 2009 Tags: capuchin, cone, douroucouli, eye, monkey, night, nocturnal, owl monkey, retina, rods, vision
by Ed Yong in Animals, Evolution, Eye evolution, Mammals, Monkeys | 5 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

5 Responses to “From day to night – a lesson in eye evolution with the owl monkey”

  1. 1.   Insesgado Says:
    May 21st, 2009 at 11:04 am

    That’s beautiful man.

  2. 2.   kai Says:
    May 21st, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    I presume bromodeoxyuridine isn’t necessarily radioactive, but that a radioactive version was created for the experiment.

  3. 3.   DDeden Says:
    May 22nd, 2009 at 2:39 am

    That’s why junk drawers are never empty, and usually have a flashlight. Never know when you’ll need it.

  4. 4.   Comrade PhysioProf Says:
    May 23rd, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    My guess is that the bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU) was not radiocative, as the whole point of using BrDU is that it can be detected by commercially available antibodies, and thus allows for the non-radioactive detection of DNA synthesis and, hence, mitosis.

  5. 5.   Ed Yong Says:
    May 23rd, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    Sorry, yes, that sentence was missing a couple of words. They used a combination of radioactive thymidine and non-radioactive BrDU to study the cell cycle in the RPCs. Well spotted.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

      • edyong209: "The lack of transparency, sweeping generalizations & unsupported conclusions shld've raised red flags at Wired." http://t.co/xz9GLMoG
      • edyong209: @criener <wistful sigh>
      • edyong209: @maggiekb1 Fond of fibre, reticent to breed?
      • edyong209: CONGRATS! RT @DaveMosher: Congrats to newlyweds @virginiahughes and @randalvegter! WOO! @ Battery Gardens Restaurant http://t.co/jZK097uq
      • edyong209: Can old-school drug discovery techniques solve the critiical lack of new antibiotics? http://t.co/rZfpcFMC #allthishashappenedbefore
      • edyong209: Irises, it turns out, change with age. Which is bad news for iris scanners. http://t.co/eALOSBu5
    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us