DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Anna’s hummingbird outflies falcons and fighter pilots
Origins of the swine flu pandemic »

Sleeping on it – how REM sleep boosts creative problem-solving

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchThe German chemist Friedrich Kekule claimed to have intuited the chemical structure of the benzene ring after falling asleep in his chair and dreaming of an ouroboros (a serpent biting its own tail). He’s certainly not the only person to have discovered a flash insight after waking from a good sleep. In science alone, many breakthroughs were apparently borne of a decent snooze, including Mendeleyev’s creation of the Periodic Table and Loewi’s experiments on the transmission of nervous signals through chemical messengers.

Most of us have tried sleeping on a difficult problem before and using an elegant experiment, Denise Cai from the University of California in San Diego has shown that this old technique really does have merit to it. She found that our brains are better at integrating disparate pieces of information after a short bout of REM (rapid eye movement) sleep – a deep, dream-rich slumber that involves a rapid fluttering of the eyes.  Cai thinks that REM sleep catalyses the creative process by allowing the brain to form connections between unrelated ideas.

Cai is by no means the first person to link sleep or dreaming to creative revelations, but she is one of the few to test it directly through experiments. She asked 77 people to complete a task, where they were given a list of three words and had to find a fourth that was linked to all three. For example, ‘cookie’, ‘heart’ and ‘sixteen’ are all associated with ‘sweet’. In each example of this ‘Remote Associates Test‘ (RAT), the missing fourth word has a different relationship to each of the three targets.

Each volunteer was tested at 9am and 5pm on the same day and in between, they were brought into a special room at 1pm and monitored. They either rested quietly to the tune of classical music, or slept for a maximum of 90 minutes. Of the 40 who dozed off, 28 managed to get some REM sleep. Regardless of how they spent their time, all the recruits did better at the word puzzles in the second session. That’s what you’d expect; the mere passage of time ought to give people a slight edge, as they mull the problems in their minds.

Some of the recruits also did a different set of tests after their morning puzzles, where they had to fill in a missing word to complete an analogy (e.g. FAST is to SLOW as HARD is to E…) Unbeknownst to them, some of the missing words were actually the answers to the earlier RAT task. This time, the recruits who got some REM sleep in the intervening time showed significant improvements in their afternoon test scores, while those who only achieved non-REM sleep or a quiet rest fared no better.

<

The REM naps were usually longer than the non-REM ones, but Cai found that the total length of sleep had no relation to the recruits’ success at the second round of tests. It was not the quantity of sleep but its quality that made all the difference to their performance. Only REM sleep allowed them to effectively draw the link between the clues hidden in the analogy tasks and their memory of the morning RATs .

Of course, having a catnap in the day does improve a wide range of mental abilities from alertness to memory. That alone might have been behind the recruits’ afternoon improvements, but Cai showed otherwise. She found that the REM-sleepers weren’t any more likely than the others to remember the answers to the morning analogies, and in fact all three groups remembered about 90% of them. It was only the REM group that managed to use that information to their advantage.

Cai also found that the REM sleepers scored higher in the afternoon tests if they were given RATs that they had seen before – if they were given new sets of words, their scores were the same as the other two groups. That strongly suggests that in this case, the benefits of REM sleep lay not in boosting memory or general mental agility, but in specifically allowing the volunteers to create associations between existing ideas. Indeed, many thinkers have defined creativity as exactly that.

In 2004, Ullrich Wagner also studied the link between slumber and creativity, and showed that people are twice as likely to discover a novel solution to a mathematical problem after sleeping on it for a night. Wagner suggested that sleep might improve “cognitive flexibility” and Cai agrees.

She suggests that REM sleep (aided by falling levels of neural signalling molecules like norepinephrine and acetylcholine) helps us to incorporate new information into existing experiences. That creates a richer network of links for us to draw upon in the future and providing the fuel for flashes of insight.

Reference: Cai, D., Mednick, S., Harrison, E., Kanady, J., & Mednick, S. (2009). REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900271106 Image of sleepy men by Bertlividet

More on sleep and creativity:

  • Colouring your mind – red improves attention to detail, blue boosts creativity
  • Portable brain activity-recorder shows that sloths aren’t all that sleepy
  • The point of sleep, or, Do fruit flies dream of six-legged sheep?


Share

June 10th, 2009 Tags: creativity, problem-solving, REM, Sleep
by Ed Yong in Inside the brain, Neuroscience and psychology, Sleep | 10 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

10 Responses to “Sleeping on it – how REM sleep boosts creative problem-solving”

  1. 1.   arvind Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Nice. So saying “This idea is so exciting I want to take a nap!” may not be a negative comment anymore? :-)

  2. 2.   Ed Yong Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    Arvind, you’re a genius. I will now take copies of this paper along to conferences so that I can justify it when I fall soundly asleep. “No, no, I’m just boosting my ability to form associations between your riveting talk and my existing knowledge.”

  3. 3.   Ian Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    So I can quote this study to my boss, then?

  4. 4.   Lilian Nattel Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Isn’t that interesting. Maybe that’s why I have to start writing in the morning–I’ve been prepped during sleep. If I have to do something else I find it much harder to get going on my book even a couple of hours later.

  5. 5.   Lab Rat Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    wow…that is an impressive looking graph! (I’ve just been reading over my dissertation work and totally laughing at all my dubious correlations)

  6. 6.   Sudeep Bhaumick Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    Hahaha… Now I know how my roommate who always fell asleep in class managed to clear all the examinations without any hitch…

  7. 7.   Julia Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    I am going to print out this paper and clip it to my lab coat when I take my thrice-weekly nap on the couch in our lobby – that way, everyone will know that I am actually hard at work from 3:30 to 4 pm!

  8. 8.   Zap Says:
    June 11th, 2009 at 10:24 am

    Not to be a wet blanket, but (contrary to the advertising) this study doesn’t tell us anything about how REM aids creative problem solving. Knowing that norepinephrine and acetylcholine levels differ in REM and in deep sleep is sorta’ informative, but not really. It’s sort of like knowing that your hard drive makes funny noises when you save documents; it’s not false, but it’s not an explanation either.

  9. 9.   Susan Says:
    June 14th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    I have sleep apnea, moderate to severe. When I do “nap” in the afternoons, or mornings, it is unintentional, and there are no dreams. I almost died in a fire last November. I fell asleep on the couch. Literally, sat down, and was out cold, while stew was on the stove. 4 smoke detectors and one Carbon Monoxide detector, all on the same floor were screaming loudly, as my husband was coming home from work. I do not remember him trying to wake me up. This has happened more than once in the last few years. My CPAP is now at level 10, but I am breathing over that! Without dreaming, I am a walking zombie during the day, am depressed, tired, anxious, defensive and moody. I have been tested twice since October of 2008, and both show signs of little or no REM sleep. I can’t survive like this much longer, and would like to know what to do? Any suggestions?

  10. 10.   Ostriches sleep like platypuses (and look wide awake when they do) | Not Exactly Rocket Science | Discovery Says:
    August 25th, 2011 at 10:50 am

    [...] why did this happen? In humans, REM sleep is said to be important for strengthening memories and boosting creativity. Did these or other REM-related skills play a role in the early evolution of birds and [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • The two-genome waltz: how the threat of mismatched partners shapes complex life [Repost]
      • Hacking the genome with a MAGE and a CAGE [Repost]
      • The Peking Man, and other lost treasures that science wants back
      • Defeating dengue by releasing mosquitoes with virus-blocking bacteria [Repost]
      • Tiny water insect makes record-breaking song with his penis [Repost]
      • Forget butterflies – wasps and flies have hidden rainbows in their wings [Repost]
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (04 February 2012)
      • Random gene sets can predict breast cancer survival better than supposedly cancer-related ones
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us