DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Rebooting science journalism – thoughts from Timmer
Terminally ill ants choose to die alone »

What colours were dinosaur feathers?

Sinosauropteryx.jpg

Dinosaur books have become more colourful affairs of late, with the dull greens, browns and greys of yesteryear replaced by vivid hues, stripes and patterns. This has largely been a question of artistic licence. While fossils may constrain an artist’s hand in terms of size and shape, they haven’t provided any information about colour. But that is starting to change.

The fossils of some small meat-eating dinosaurs were covered in filaments that are widely thought to be the precursors of feathers. And among these filaments, a team of Chinese and British scientists have found the distinctive signs of melanosomes, small structures that are partly responsible for the colours of modern bird feathers.

Melanosomes are packed with melanins, pigments that range from drab blacks and greys to reddish-brown and yellow hues. Their presence in dinosaur filaments has allowed Fucheng Zhang to start piecing together the colours of these animals, millions of years after their extinction. For example, Zhang thinks that the small predator Sinosauropteryx had “chestnut to reddish-brown” stripes running down its tail and probably a similarly coloured crest down its back. Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.

Zhang’s discovery also launches another salvo into a debate over the very nature of “feathered” dinosaurs. Beautiful fossils, mainly from China, show that several species of dinosaur had feathers akin to the flight-capable plumes of modern birds. Species like Caudipteryx and the four-winged Microraptor had true feathers with asymmetric vanes arranged around a central shaft.

Other species, such as Sinosauropteryx, Sinornithosaurus, Beipaiosaurus, and even distant relatives like Tianyulong and Psittacosaurus, had far simpler filaments (“dino fuzz”) covering parts of their skin. These are more controversial.  Many groups view these filaments as proto-feathers, the evolutionary predecessors to the fine plumage of birds. But a small minority still interpret them as degraded strands of collagen, a protein that strengthens animal skin.

Sinosauropteryx_melanosomes.jpgBut if Zhang is right, it may be game over for the collagen hypothesis. His study shows that melanosomes have been preserved in the same way in the filaments of Sinosauropteryx as they were in the true feathers of early birds. It’s evidence of a link between the two structures.

Under the extreme magnification of an electron microscope, Zhang looked at the filaments of the dinosaurs Sinosauropteryx and Sinornithosaurus, as well as the true feathers of the early bird Confuciusornis. The microscopes revealed a number of small structures all less than a micrometre long. In shape and size, they are identical to the melanosomes of modern birds. There include two broad categories. The phaemelanosomes are almost spherical in shape and produce phaeomelanin, a reddish-brown or yellow pigment, while the eumelanosomes are more rod-like and produce black-grey eumelanin.

Confuciusornis_melanosomes.jpg

Zebra_finch_melanosomes.jpg

Melanosomes are remarkably resilient structures. They’re more resistant to both chemical and physical decay than the keratin of feathers and hair. Nonetheless, critics will undoubtedly argue that these microscopic structures weren’t melanosomes at all but bacteria, whose cells have since been replaced by sediment. Zhang is prepared for that, and has put forward several lines of evidence to answer his sceptics.

For a start, they appear inside the feathers and filaments, rather than sitting outside them in a thin film. They’re also found in the same parts of the fossils as they are in modern feathers. They’re arranged in the same pattern – the eumelanosomes, in particular, are “densely packed and strongly aligned”. In some cases, the fossil feathers are clearly striped by bands of pigment and the alleged eumelanosomes only turn up in the dark ones, just as you’d expect. There’s no reason for bacteria to have been so evenly spaced – they would more likely have formed a uniform film over the entire structure.

Zhang is ruthless in his interpretation, saying that the melanosomes make it “unequivocally” clear that these filaments were not strands of collagen. Instead, they “are probably the evolutionary precursors of true feathers”. And now we’re starting to have an idea of what colour these precursors were.

This isn’t the first time that fossilised melanosomes have been used to work out the colour of extinct species. In 2008, Jakob Vinther from Yale University found these pigmented structures in the fossil feather of a Cretaceous bird, and concluded that it probably had black and white stripes. Last year, Vinther reported that the layers of melanosomes in another fossil feather would have given it an iridescent sheen, much like the gloss on the wing of a starling. Carl Zimmer covered the story for the New York Times.

Both of Vinther’s papers talk about the possibility of using the same technique to reconstruct dinosaurs in accurate Technicolour. Now, it seems that this hope is becoming a reality. But while Vinther is convinced by the melanosomes that Zhang has found, he’s more skeptical about the inferences about colour. “Saying that Sinosauropteryx was rufous-red, based on one sample is a stretch,” he says. We don’t even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours. “Without this knowledge quantified, we cannot predict specific colors in fossils, maybe except black. So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs.”

However, Vinther remains optimistic. “I can only say that the future is promising. Eventually we will have dinosaurs in technicolor. We are working seriously on that currently.”

Working out what colour dinosaurs were isn’t just a matter of nerdy curiosity. The colours of a bird’s feathers affect its ability to keep cool, camouflage itself from predators or prey, and communicate with mates and rivals. In this way, a better understanding of dinosaur colours could give us more clues about how these most evocative of animals lived.

Mike Benton, a co-author on the new study, says, “In Sinosauropteryx at least, essentially the most primitive dinosaur with feathers, the possession of an orange and white striped tail says ‘display’ of some kind, but whether for warning or pre-mating contests, we couldn’t say.”

Reference: Zhang et al. 2010. Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds. Nature doi:10.1038/nature08740

Images: Sinosauropteryx painting by Chuang Zhao and Lida Xing; Confucisusornis images from Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing and University of Bristol; Sinosauropteryx images by Nanjing Institute and University of Bristol; Zebra finch images by University of Bristol.

More on feathered dinosaurs:

  • Evidence that Velociraptor had feathers
  • Beipaiosaurus was covered in the simplest known feathers
  • Tianyulong – a fuzzy dinosaur that makes the origin of feathers fuzzier
  • Microraptor – the dinosaur that flew like a biplane

Twitter.jpg Facebook.jpg Feed.jpg Book.jpg

Share

January 27th, 2010 Tags: colour, confuciusornis, dinosaur, feather, melanosome, Sinornithosaurus, sinosauropteryx
by Ed Yong in Birds, Dinosaurs, Evolution, Feathered dinosaurs, Palaeontology | 13 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

13 Responses to “What colours were dinosaur feathers?”

  1. 1.   James Hanley Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Fascinating. I don’t comment here nearly enough, but as a social scientist who’s consistently interested in natural science issues, only lacks the time (and obviously some expertise) to follow them, this kind of reporting is incredibly beneficial. Thank you so much.

  2. 2.   Erin Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    EEE! Things like this make me so happy. It’s the kind of awesome science that I ate up as a kid.

  3. 3.   psweet Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    Cool! But we shouldn’t get too far ahead of ourselves. Melanosomes are only one way in which birds produce color in their feathers. Have any of these authors considered the possibility of carotenoids, or whether the sort of structural colors that bluebirds or hummingbirds show would leave fossil traces?
    It seems quite likely that we’ll have an idea of patterns (still really neat) but with less certainty of which shades those patterns are cast in.

  4. 4.   Obnoxio The Clown Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    There’s cool, there’s way cool, and then there’s this! :o )

  5. 5.   kathy Orlinsky Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    Very exciting! Or should I say, ‘beautiful’?
    These melanosomes were only found in the fossils of feathered dinosaurs, right? I wonder if researchers will be able to find them in skin traces of nonfeathered dinosaurs as well.

  6. 6.   Joshua Fan Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    Wow, you wouldn’t think we would find out the colour of dinosaurs until we successfully bred one. So many surprising things to be found with patience and a microscope.

  7. 7.   Ed Yong Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    Love the enthusiastic responses!
    Psweet – Benton says that, yes, there are some colour-producing pigments that won’t be represented in this way, including yellow-orange carotenoids or green-purple porphyrins. However, if you check out one of the links in the later paragraphs (under “Vinther reported”) you’ll see that your point about iridescence and structural colours has been addressed in a similar study.

  8. 8.   The Ridger Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    We won’t find blue either, I’m guessing, since that’s not a pigment at all. But this is so cool!

  9. 9.   Jimbonius Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 9:47 am

    Maybe it’s just me, but in both sets of electron microscope images above, it’s the eumelanosomes that appear more rod-like and the phaemelanosomes that look more spherical. No?

  10. 10.   RichardL Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    So fossil experts here claim that bacteria can produce fossil shapes, but in meteorites from Mars experts claim that bacteria can’t produce fossil shapes?

  11. 11.   Ed Yong Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 6:39 pm

    Jimbonius – you’re right, I mixed up the shape descriptions. Now fixed.

  12. 12.   psweet Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    Thanks, Ed. I guess we’re closer than I thought.

  13. 13.   DDeden Says:
    February 6th, 2010 at 8:17 pm

    Rod forms are merely spheres with columns between the hemisphere shells, whether in bacteria, melanosomes or buckyballs vs end-capped nanotubes. Geometrically, it is a transition from pentameric icosahedral symmetrical hemi-spheroidal end caps to hexameric columns. The hexa-skin shape may produce a change in light transmission compared to the round shape.
    It is said that powered flight in modern birds requires asymmetrical feathers, but I think that flight with symmetrical feathers was possible, using them in a different way, more as gravity-powered glide-flight arboreal raptor ambush style. Having long striped tails is convergently typical of arboreal stem-climbers which hop up branches (especially whorled conifer-like trees) rather than swinging and clinging. /geek

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us