DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Crayfish females lure males with urine, but then play hard to get
When pain is pleasant »

Caterpillars use bacteria to produce green islands in yellowing leaves

Green_islandIn autumn, as green hues give way to yellows and oranges, some leaves develop mysterious green islands, where life apparently holds fast against the usual seasonal decay. These defiant patches still continue the business of photosynthesis long after the rest of the leaf has withered. They aren’t the tree’s doing. They are the work of tiny larval insects that live inside it – leaf-miners.

The larvae were laid within the leaf’s delicate layers by their mother. They depend on it for shelter and sustenance, and they can’t move away. If their home dies, they die, so they have a vested interest in keeping at least part of the leaf alive. These are the miniature landscape architects that create the green islands, and they don’t do it alone – to manipulate the plant, they wield bacteria.

Wilfried Kaiser and scientists from Rabelais University discovered this partnership after realising that some bacteria and fungi can also cause green islands. He reasoned that microbes might be helping insects to achieve the same ends. So he searched for them in one particular species, a tiny moth called the spotted tentiform leaf-miner, Phyllonorycter blancardella. Its larva makes its home in the leaves of apple trees.

Kaiser found that the leaf-miners are host to just one detectable type of bacteria – Wolbachia. That’s hardly surprising. Wolbachia infects around 60% of the world’s insect species, making it a strong candidate for the title of world’s most successful parasite. Without exception, every leaf-miner that Kaiser tested, from all over the Loire Valley, carried Wolbachia in their tissues.

The bacteria were the true agents behind the green islands. When Kaiser cured the leaf-miners of their infections using antibiotics, they seemed perfectly healthy. But they completely lost the ability to stem the yellowing of leaves. As a result, 85% perished before adulthood; for comparion, the typical mortality rate of Wolbachia-carrying larvae is just 10%. Worst of all, since Wolbachia is passed down from mother to offspring, later generations also suffered the same lack of beneficial bacteria, the same inability to produce green islands and the same high odds of an early death.

Leaf-minersThe bacteria manipulate the leaves using their own signalling chemicals – a group of plant hormones called cytokinins. These substances perform many tasks in a leaf: they maintain the supply of chlorophyll; they prevent the leaf from dying; and they control the flow and storage of nutrients. They’re the barrier that stands between a living leaf and a rotting one. Stick cut plants in cytokinin solution and they’ll stay green for longer. What better tool for a bacterium or an insect looking to prolong the life of its leafy home?

Inside a typical mine, levels of cytokinins are much higher than usual. But when Kaiser cured the leaf-miners of Wolbachia, he found that the levels of cytokinins in the mine plummeted to levels typically seen in yellow leaves.  Without these hormones, the insects failed to protect their homes. And if Kaiser injected cytokinins into leaves directly, he could create green islands on his own, without the need for either Wolbachia or a leaf-miner.

We know that the bacteria are necessary for the cytokinin flood that maintains the mine, but the exact source of these chemicals is unclear. It’s possible that the bacteria secrete them directly, or allow the leaf-miner to do so. Indeed, Wolbachia has a gene that’s important for the creation of cytokinins, and a paper published four decades ago found large amounts of these hormones in the salivary glands of a leaf-miner. The other alternative is that the bacteria encourage the plant to over-produce its own hormones. Of course, all of these possibilities could be working together.

Of course, many insects have their own beneficial resident bacteria, or symbionts. These tenants provide them with valuable nutrients that they can’t make themselves, and they can even offer protection against enemies and environmental challenges.  But this is the only known example of an insect using a bacterial symbiont to directly manipulate a plant, and it seems to be a successful strategy.

By all accounts, leaf-mining is an evolutionary success story, and hundreds of species have adopted this lifestyle. Their partnership with bacteria might be the secret of their success but Kaiser will only know that for sure once he works out how widespread the use of bacteria is, and what these microbes actually do to the plant.

Reference: Kaiser, W., Huguet, E., Casas, J., Commin, C., & Giron, D. (2010). Plant green-island phenotype induced by leaf-miners is mediated by bacterial symbionts Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0214

Images: by Kaiser

More on insects and bacteria

  • Life-shortening bacteria vs. dengue mosquitoes
  • Butterflies evolve resistance to male-killing bacteria in record time
  • An entire bacterial genome discovered inside that of a fruit fly
  • Virus and bacteria team up to save aphid from parasitic wasp
  • Museum butterfly collections chronicle evolutionary war against male-killers
  • Leafcutter ants rely on bacteria to fertilise their fungus gardens

Twitter.jpg Facebook.jpg Feed.jpg Book.jpg

Share

March 30th, 2010 Tags: Bacteria, caterpillars, green islands, leaf-miner, leaves, Wolbachia
by Ed Yong in Animal behaviour, Animal defences, Animals, Bacteria, Butterflies and moths, Insects, Invertebrates | 11 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

11 Responses to “Caterpillars use bacteria to produce green islands in yellowing leaves”

  1. 1.   Christina Says:
    March 30th, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    Fascinating! I had no idea that Wolbachia could have a symbiotic relationship with its host – I was under the impression that they were solely parasitic

  2. 2.   Ed Yong Says:
    March 30th, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    Cool, isn’t it? There’s much more to Wolbachia than just parasitism. Check this out: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/30/an-entire-bacterial-genome-discovered-inside-that-of-a-fruit-fly/

  3. 3.   Brian Too Says:
    March 30th, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    Sorry, these links don’t work. Or more accurately, they work but there’s no content at the destination. The expected Wolbachia article just ain’t there.

  4. 4.   Megan Says:
    March 30th, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    If you enter “an-entire-bacterial-genome-discovered-inside-that-of-a-fruit-fly” into google, you can get the entry that way; it’s the first link.

    Or, you can just go to the old site: http://notexactlyrocketscience.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/an-entire-bacterial-genome-discovered-inside-that-of-a-fruit-fly/

  5. 5.   Nathan Myers Says:
    March 30th, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Funny, I found it at http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/an_entire_bacterial_genome_discovered_inside_that_of_a_fruit.php .

    I notice that since 2007, the fraction of insects parasitized by W. has increased from 20% to 60%. That’s fast work!

  6. 6.   Ed Yong Says:
    March 31st, 2010 at 6:39 am

    Ok I’ve fixed all the links. They should all work now.

  7. 7.   Art Says:
    March 31st, 2010 at 8:03 am

    Does Wolbachia infest 20% of insect species, like the link says, or 60%, as stated in this article?

  8. 8.   Ed Yong Says:
    March 31st, 2010 at 8:36 am

    Right, I’ve found the reason behind the differing stats.

    The 20% figure came from this story based on this paper, which said “Wolbachia… infects a wide range of arthropods, including at least 20% of insect species”. For that statement, it cites this paper but if you actually look at it, it doesn’t mention a 20% stat anywhere! It says that “at least 16% of neotropic insects are infected with W. pipientis”, which may have become rounded up, but neotropical insects aren’t all insect species.

    Meanwhile, the 60% figure comes from this story based on this paper, which says “Wolbachia… are estimated to infect more than 60% of all insect species.” For that stat, it cites this paper, which says:

    “Estimates suggest that at least 20% of all insect species are infected with Wolbachia these estimates result from several Wolbachia screenings in which numerous species were tested for infection; however, tests were mostly performed on only one to two individuals per species. The actual percent of species infected will depend on the distribution of infection frequencies among species. We present a meta-analysis that estimates percentage of infected species based on data on the distribution of infection levels among species. We used a beta-binomial model that describes the distribution of infection frequencies of Wolbachia, shedding light on the overall infection rate as well as on the infection frequency within species. Our main findings are that (1) the proportion of Wolbachia-infected species is estimated to be 66%.”

  9. 9.   Lizzy Wilbanks Says:
    April 1st, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    This stuff is fascinating. Thanks for bringing this great new study to my attention! Michael Turelli’s lab at UC Davis has been doing really interesting research on the wolbachia-mutualist question for some time: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852586/

  10. 10.   JOLIVET, Pierre Says:
    April 9th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    May I get a copy on line of your recent paper on Plant green-island …publshed into PRS B April 07 2010?
    Thanks.

  11. 11.   MGourley Says:
    July 26th, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    I know this post is a little late, but as a Wolbachia researcher, I wanted to address the issue of contradicting estimations of Wolbachia infection frequencies in arthropod populations. The comment from Ed Young highlighted how inconsistent published reports of Wolb infection rate/status can be.

    So here’s the problem: Most animals on the planet are arthropods. Think about it, every insect and bug, every crustacean (ie: lobsters and crabs)- they are all arthropods and there are TONS of them! This means that it is nearly impossible to survey all arthropds to determine their Wolbachia-infection status. We can’t even get close to looking at “most” of them.
    Even when research groups DO look for Wolbachia, its hard to maintain one central, current list of who has Wolb and who doesn’t.
    The majority of arthropods that HAVE been surveyed do seems contain Wolbachia, which makes some researchers think that about 90% of arthropods contain Wolb. But other, more conservative and hesitant scientists don’t think enough arthropods have been surveyed to justify such a big percent estimation, and claim 20% Wolb infection.

    As a result, many researchers will publish 20-90% in efforts to appease all of the authors and reviewers involved in getting a publication into print.

    TAKE HOME POINT: No one knows how many arthropods have Wolbachia, but since arthropods are the most abundant animals on the planet, and since many arthropods seem to be infected with Wolbachia, that makes Wolbachia a bacteria of pandemic proportions!

    Great blog! Thanks for spreading the word about Wolbachia!

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • The two-genome waltz: how the threat of mismatched partners shapes complex life [Repost]
      • Hacking the genome with a MAGE and a CAGE [Repost]
      • The Peking Man, and other lost treasures that science wants back
      • Defeating dengue by releasing mosquitoes with virus-blocking bacteria [Repost]
      • Tiny water insect makes record-breaking song with his penis [Repost]
      • Forget butterflies – wasps and flies have hidden rainbows in their wings [Repost]
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (04 February 2012)
      • Random gene sets can predict breast cancer survival better than supposedly cancer-related ones
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us