DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Photo safari – Australian pelicans
Genes and culture: OXTR gene influences social behaviour differently in Americans and Koreans »

Disease by coincidence – why we’re caught in the crossfire of a hidden war

Ecoli_dictyostelium

If you’re trapped in a building, it’s probably not the best time to start setting fire to things. But this is exactly what some bacteria do when they find themselves in a human; they cause diseases that are potentially fatal but not contagious. Without an escape, they risk going down with their host. This seems like a ludicrous strategy but we’re looking at it from the wrong perspective – our own. In truth, humans often have nothing to do with the diseases that plague us; we’re just collateral damage in an invisible war.

Like all living things, bacteria have to defend themselves against predators like amoebas. Some species do so using resistance genes that turn them from passive victims into aggressive fighters. And by coincidence, these same adaptations make them more virulent (good at causing disease) in human bodies. We’re just caught in the crossfire.

The idea that virulent bacteria have adapted to entirely different problems is called the “coincidental evolution hypothesis”. Sandrine Adiba from Pierre and Marie Curie University found evidence to support it by showing that the typically harmless gut bacterium Escherichia coli can cause disease in mice after it’s exposed to the threat of amoebas.

E.coli is mostly harmless, but some strains can cause severe food poisoning. When it’s not colonising the guts of mammals, it’s found in the soil; in both environments, it’s threatened by roving amoebas, which effectively engulf and digest it. Adiba found that one such predator – an amoeba called Dictyostelium discoideum – was very good at munching its way through harmless strains of E.coli, but a disease-causing strain known as 536 was too much to swallow.

Once engulfed, this hardy strain actually managed to reproduce inside the amoeba, weakening and eventually killing it. And if it can do that in a hungry amoeba, it can do that in a mammal cell; from its point of view, the two environments aren’t that different. Adiba confirmed that by pitting 31 different strains of E.coli against Dictyostelium. She found that those which tend to live in harmony with mammals also succumbed to amoebas, while resistant strains tend to cause disease.

The resistant strains had several genes that allowed them to avoid death by digestion. Some shield E.coli from enzymes called lysozymes that break down the outer walls of their cells. Others allow it to find food, by scavenging iron from within the amoeba’s body. These genes help to foil predators, but they’re also “virulence factors” that allow E.coli to successfully infect mammal cells. In fact, 76% of the resistant strains carry these weapons compared to just 16% of the vulnerable strains.

This was a single case study but it probably reflects a very common trend. Some scientists have suggested that for many bacteria, the ability to resist grazing amoebas came before the ability to cause disease in humans and other mammals. The former skill opened up the door to the latter.

There are many other examples that support this idea. Some E.coli strains wield poisons called Shiga toxins that are bad news for their hosts, but that also ward off a predator called Tetrahymena. When Salmonella enterica, another food poisoning germ, is threatened by amoebas, it ends up with more genetic variation at a part of its genome that affects how virulent it is.

Legionella pneumophila, which causes Legionnaires’ disease, might never even have been able to harm humans at all, were it not for amoebas. Legionella specialises in infecting our immune cells, including the macrophages that vacuum up foreign invaders. This ability to outsmart our defenders may again be coincidental; it’s more likely that the bacterium originally evolved to resist the digestive powers of amoebas, which also suck them up in the same way as macrophages.

And so far, we have just considered predators, which form one small part of the life of a bacterium. Competitors also shape their evolution. Earlier this year, I described how the normally harmless nose bacterium Streptococcus pneumonia becomes infectious when it battles against another species called Haemophilius influenzae. This competitor summons white blood cells to do away with Streptococcus, which can defend itself by producing a thicker coat. But this armour also allows Streptococcus to evade our own immune system, resulting in pneumonia, meningitis and other diseases. As I wrote back then, “many human diseases really have nothing to do with us at all.”

Reference: Adiba, S., Nizak, C., van Baalen, M., Denamur, E., & Depaulis, F. (2010). From Grazing Resistance to Pathogenesis: The Coincidental Evolution of Virulence Factors PLoS ONE, 5 (8) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011882

More on bacteria:

  • When bacteria fight bacteria, we lose
  • Fighting bacteria with bacteria – common nose germ provides new weapon against superbugs
  • When enslaved bacteria go bad
  • The bacterial zoo in your bowel
  • Cooperating bacteria are vulnerable to slackers

If the citation link isn’t working, read why here


Twitter.jpg Facebook.jpg Feed.jpg Book.jpg

Share

August 16th, 2010 Tags: Bacteria, coincidental evolution, Dictyostelium, E.coli
by Ed Yong in Bacteria, Evolution, Medicine & health | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

3 Responses to “Disease by coincidence – why we’re caught in the crossfire of a hidden war”

  1. 1.   lucas Says:
    August 16th, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    Wow, I find the hypothesis that virulent strains are pathogenic as a necessary consequence of other adaptations really intriguing. It makes sense, the more I think of it. With all the bacteria and other microscopic lifeforms out there, there’s bound to be some of them that ‘interact’ with us in unforeseen (and unintentional, from their perspective) ways.
    My only minor point of critique is that the team used a strain was known to be pathogenic to test their hypothesis. It would’ve been way more cool and convincing if they had artificially selected E. coli cells from a non-pathogenic strain that were able to resist the attacks of Dictyostelium, and show that this strain is more harmful for mice or capable to better resist macrophages.

  2. 2.   sittingoverhere Says:
    August 16th, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    Apparently there is a suggestion that the S. aureus Vs. S epidermidis battle is also (that you have written about here earlier) may have induced virulence in S. aureus as it searches for a new niche to occupy.
    Also pneumo has another trick. Whilst producing a thicker coat it can also upregulate surface proteins that bind host factor H. Host factor H is one of the molecule the host uses to distinguish self from non-self. The bacteria essentially put on a host cell ‘suit’ and say “don’t look at me! You’re looking for that guy” and the Haemophilius’ trick can backfire.

  3. 3.   gillt Says:
    August 20th, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    Ed: “When Salmonella enterica, another food poisoning germ, is threatened by amoebas, it ends up with more genetic variation at a part of its genome that affects how virulent it is.”

    Do you mean to say “Salmonella in close proximity to amoebas have more genetic variation [...] than ones that aren’t threatened by amoebas”?

    Because it sounds like you’re saying amoebas give off some signal that directly affects the genome of nearby Salmonella, which would be weird.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • The two-genome waltz: how the threat of mismatched partners shapes complex life [Repost]
      • Hacking the genome with a MAGE and a CAGE [Repost]
      • The Peking Man, and other lost treasures that science wants back
      • Defeating dengue by releasing mosquitoes with virus-blocking bacteria [Repost]
      • Tiny water insect makes record-breaking song with his penis [Repost]
      • Forget butterflies – wasps and flies have hidden rainbows in their wings [Repost]
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (04 February 2012)
      • Random gene sets can predict breast cancer survival better than supposedly cancer-related ones
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us