DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Monkey see, monkey facepalm
I’ve got your missing links right here (5th February 2011) »

Unattractive partners are stressful for choosy birds

You’re at a party and you’re single. Unfortunately, so are most of your friends, and they have already paired up with the most attractive people in the room. Do you try your chances with the ones who are left, even though you don’t really like them?

Animals face these sorts of decisions all the time. For example, the vast majority of birds stay with their mates for at least one breeding season. Some even mate for life. None of them have an infinite choice of mates, and some individuals will inevitably end up with an inferior partner. And according to Simon Griffith from Macquarie University, that can be a very stressful experience.

Griffith worked with the stunning Gouldian finch. It’s hard to think that any bird so beautiful could be unattractive but even for them, looks matter. The birds have either red or black heads, and all of them prefer to mate with partners that share the same colour. If a mixed pair gets together, their chicks are 40-80% more likely to die early. So for a female, it pays to be choosy about her mates.

Griffith set up a mass speed-dating event by introducing large groups of Gouldian finches, all strangers, into six aviaries.  Eventually, they all paired up and settled down in a set of next boxes. If females ended up with males of the opposite head colour, they laid their first egg nearly a month later than those who landed a male with the same colour. Their blood also contained around three times as much corticosterone, a hormone produced in stressful situations.

If Griffith forced the females into arranged partnerships with specific males, he found the same thing. Females who were saddled with unattractive males laid their eggs later and had more corticosterone. Griffith found that their hormones spiked just 12 hours after they met their partner and stayed high for several weeks. The speed of the spike suggests that the male didn’t do anything to boost the female’s hormones. She was just reacting to his presence.

Griffith writes, “These females are making the best of a bad situation and are dissatisfied with their partner although he does represent a better option than not breeding at all.” So why feel stressed about it? Here, it would be too easy to anthropomorphise the birds, by picturing them sulking in their nest boxes. But remember that Griffith measured the levels of a hormone; he didn’t interview the birds about their emotions.

Griffith thinks that a surge of stress hormones could actually help the finches. Stressed animals often put less effort into reproduction. After all, when conditions are tough, it might make sense to focus on surviving rather than breeding. And if finches are stuck with an incompatible partner, they could also benefit from belaying their resources until they find a better one.  The hormones could even affect a female’s behaviour, making her more likely to seek out a better partner for some sneaky sex on the side. A female who’s stuck with a poor male isn’t out of options.

Reference: Griffith, Pryke & Buttemer. 2011. Constrained mate choice in social monogamy and the stress of having an unattractive partner. Proc Roy Soc B http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2672

Images by Arjan Haverkamp and Snowmanradio

More on sexy birds:

  • Bird of paradise creates colourful dance with microscopic mirrors in its feathers
  • Male bowerbirds create forced perspective illusions that only females see
  • Female birds breed better in captivity if they see sexy males
  • Ballistic penises and corkscrew vaginas – the sexual battles of ducks
Share

February 3rd, 2011 by Ed Yong in Animal behaviour, Animals, Birds, Sex and reproduction | 9 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

9 Responses to “Unattractive partners are stressful for choosy birds”

  1. 1.   GlidingPig Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 10:12 am

    “If females chose males with the same head colour, they laid their first egg nearly a month earlier than those who were stuck with an oppositely coloured male. Their blood also contained around three times as much corticosterone, a hormone produced in stressful situations.”

    Same color and more stress? Shouldn’t that be less stress? Or I might be reading it wrong.

    [D'oh! Fixed. Thanks - Ed]

  2. 2.   Mackrelmint Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 10:49 am

    One more fix needed. Now all females seem to be with opposite males. “If females ended up with males of the opposite head colour, they laid their first egg nearly a month later than those who were stuck with an oppositely coloured male.”
    Which got to be with males of the same head colour?

    Do males help rear chicks? If female stress level affects more than just egg laying date and also affect female care of the chicks, perhaps the males with opposite headed females could compensate and increase their attention to the chicks. (Or do they get stressed too?)
    Thanks for the write up. Now I’ll have to go read the original article.

  3. 3.   Nuno Machado Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 11:44 am

    “If females ended up with males of the opposite head colour, they laid their first egg nearly a month later than those who were stuck with an oppositely coloured male.”

    Shouldn’t the first “opposite” be replaced by “same”?

  4. 4.   Ed Yong Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Arrg goddammit. Okay all of those problems should now be fixed. Look, just everyone stare at teh pretty birds, okay?

  5. 5.   aki Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    I haven’t read the full paper, but isn’t this suggestive of incipient speciation? – if mates from the different color morphs are producing fewer viable offspring. Not that the changes in hormone levels aren’t interesting in this situation – and it might be one of the proximate mechanisms enforcing correct mate choice and pushing toward speciation.

  6. 6.   gruebait Says:
    February 3rd, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    After reading this, into my head popped recollection of James Carville’s strategy for successfully picking up women in bars: “Go ugly early.”

    He said that while sitting with his wife, on network television. Glaring ensued.

  7. 7.   megan Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:04 am

    Hey thank god there’s spermbanks, AI or just staying single in advanced developed nations.

  8. 8.   tim Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 4:41 am

    How do the birds know what colour their own heads are? Or is the preference based out of genetic predisposition? if so, I’d agree with aki’s suggestion the hormone levels and survival rates are more related to speciation.

  9. 9.   Linda Says:
    February 9th, 2011 at 1:03 am

    Interesting, agree with Aki and Tim, there might be some speciation goin’ on. if it is, it’s the first time i’ve heard of appearances being a driving force for it. (not that i’m that familiar with speciation or evolution)

    this is such a fun post, and it sounds remarkably similar to some of the rom-coms out there.

    “Griffith found that their hormones spiked just 12 hours after they met their partner and stayed high for several weeks. The speed of the spike suggests that the male didn’t do anything to boost the female’s hormones. She was just reacting to his presence.”

    guess it’s not just humans who are shallow. lol.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • I’ve got your missing links right here (26 May 2012)
      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us