DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« A timeline of the Fukushima disaster
[RETRACTED] Disordered environments promote stereotypes and discrimination [RETRACTED] »

Sleepless in Mexico – three cavefish groups independently evolved to lose sleep

Caves are dark, sheltered and often quiet. They’re seemingly ideal places for a bit of a nap. But for a small Mexican fish, they have done exactly the opposite. As a result of life in dark caves, the blind cavefish has evolved sleeplessness, on at least three separate occasions. They don’t go entirely without sleep, but they doze far less than their surface-dwelling relatives.

The blind cavefish (Astyanax mexicanus) is a sightless version of a popular aquarium species, the Mexican tetra. They live in 29 deep caves scattered throughout Mexico, which their sighted ancestors colonised in the middle of the Pleistocene era. In this environment of perpetual darkness, the eyes of these forerunners were of little use and as generations passed, they disappeared entirely. Today, the fish are born with eyes that degenerate as they get older. Eventually, their useless husks are covered by skin.

They went through other changes too. For example, their skin lost its pigment so they are all pinkish-white in colour. And now, Erik Duboué from New York University had found that they also sleep less than their relatives on the surface.

Duboué works in the lab of Richard Borowsky, who has been studying the blind cavefish for years. The duo noticed that the captive cavefish in their laboratory were surprisingly active at night, and they wanted to know if they didn’t sleep as much.  How do you work out if a fish is asleep? Duboué did it by basically poking them and seeing how long it took them to respond. He found that the fish reacted far less strongly to a gentle poke if they hadn’t moved very much for a minute. At this point, he classified them as “asleep”.

Duboué compared blind fish from three separate caves – Pachón, Tinaja, and Molino – as well as one of their sighted surface cousins. He found that the surface fish sleep for an enviable 13 hours a day – mostly at night, with the odd afternoon nap. The cavefish, on the other hand, sleep for just 2-4 hours a day. When they do fall asleep, they’re just as heavily under as their surface cousins, and their movements slow to the same extent. They’re not lighter sleepers – they just get less of it.

The cavefish are a fantastic example of convergent evolution, where populations take different routes towards the same suite of adaptations. The Pachón, Tinaja, and Molino cavefish all entered separate cave systems that aren’t connected to one another. They lost their sight, and their sleep, independently of one another.

These separate paths became abundantly clear in 2008, when Borowsky bred blind cavefish from different populations and produced youngsters that could see! In a single generation, he managed to reverse a million years of evolution. Borowsky succeeded because the different groups of blind cavefish lost their eyes through different genetic changes. In any one lineage, these changes work together to nix the development of the growing eyeball. But in the hybrids, every altered gene inherited from one parent was compensated by a normal copy from the other.

Duboué and Borowsky wanted to see if they could breed cavefish with normal sleeping patterns in a similar way. When they bred Pachón or Tinaja cavefish with surface fish, he found that the hybrids still didn’t sleep very much. When they bred the hybrids with more surface fish, they produced some youngsters that nodded off for long surface-style hours, and some whose sleeping patterns were half-way between the two extremes.

This suggests that the shorter snoozes of the cavefish are driven by a combination of altered genes, some of which have dominant effects. Borowsky’s next mission is to find which genes – they might also control the sleeping patterns of humans and other animals.

For now, the team doesn’t know why the cavefish have evolved to catch ten winks instead of the standard forty. After all, sleep is important. Aside from the fact that animals perform better if they are well-rested, experiments on humans and fruit flies have shown that sleep is important for solidifying memories. There’s no reason to think that cavefish have less need of alert brains or lasting memories. Instead, it’s possible that they simply cannot afford to sleep any more than they do. They live in realms where food is a rare commodity, and they might need to be constantly on the lookout for it.

It will be interesting to see if other cave-dwellers share the same adaptations. After all, many other cave species, or troglobites, share the degenerated eyes, pale skin and heightened senses of the cavefish. In these dark worlds, convergence is king. On that note, as I write this, the time is 1.30am and I am in a dark living room lit only by a dim energy-saving lightbulb. I need to be awake in five hours. See? Convergence…

Reference: Duboue, Keene & Borowsky. 2011. Evolutionary Convergence on Sleep Loss in Cavefish Populations. Current Biology ref tbc

Image by skpy

More on cavefish:

  • Giant insect splits cavefish into distinct populations
  • Cross-breeding restores sight to blind cavefish

More on sleep

  • To sleep, perchance to dream, perchance to remember
  • Memories can be strengthened while we sleep by providing the right triggers
  • Sleeping on it – how REM sleep boosts creative problem-solving
  • The point of sleep, or, Do fruit flies dream of six-legged sheep?
Share

April 7th, 2011 by Ed Yong in Animal behaviour, Animals, Convergent evolution, Evolution, Fish, Sleep | 5 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

5 Responses to “Sleepless in Mexico – three cavefish groups independently evolved to lose sleep”

  1. 1.   SteveF Says:
    April 7th, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    Paper here:

    http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2811%2900292-2

  2. 2.   Jon F Says:
    April 7th, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    Oh, come now, Ed, a true Englishman rarely sees the Sun anyway, so what does it matter what time it is?

    Seriously, though, convergent evolution is probably the best thing ever. I know that fish don’t “sleep” in the same sense that mammals do, but is it understood what sort of neurological changes are undergone when fish are “asleep”? Furthermore, does sleep deprivation in fish have the same deleterious effects it has on mammals?

  3. 3.   Tim Says:
    April 7th, 2011 at 4:47 pm

    Isn’t a sighted fish’s sleep cycle is tied to daylight hours? At least for aquarium fish, I know they’re awake for as long as I leave the light on. When the tank is blacked out, they’re asleep within 10 minutes.

    For blind cave fish, without that dependency on light to dictate when to be active, they can afford to be active as long as their senses allow. As for the dependence on sleep to heal the body, I wonder if other cave-dwelling animals that are blind as a result of evolution have the same sleep cycles. My hypothesis is that there is no diurnal/nocturnal cycle in most of these animals.

  4. 4.   Jason Goldman Says:
    April 7th, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    Excellent closing!

  5. 5.   Lee Says:
    April 15th, 2011 at 6:19 am

    Love this article.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • I’ve got your missing links right here (26 May 2012)
      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us