<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#039;ve got your missing links right here (28 May 2011)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hbd chick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11869</link>
		<dc:creator>hbd chick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11869</guid>
		<description>n≠3.  there were definitely more than 3 raters in the add health surveys.

what kanazawa said was:  &lt;i&gt;&quot;The physical attractiveness of each Add Health respondent is measured three times by three different interviewers over seven years.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

the &quot;three times&quot; refers to the first three waves in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;add health survey&lt;/a&gt;.

in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the first wave&lt;/a&gt;, 12,105 adolescents were interviewed for 1-2 hours during a 9 month period.

if all the interviews were 1.5 hours, interviewing 12,105 subjects would amount to over 2270 eight-hour days.

there&#039;s only ca. 21.6 working days per month on average x 9 months x 3 interviewers = 583 eight hour days.  but you&#039;d need 12 interviewers to cover 2270 eight-hour days.

and that&#039;s just in the first wave.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wave ii&lt;/a&gt; saw 15,000 students interviewed; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wave iii&lt;/a&gt;, 15,170.

also, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rti.org/page.cfm/Job_Openings&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fieldworkers used&lt;/a&gt; typically work only a 20-25 hour week, so there&#039;s at least twice the number of interviewers required than i&#039;ve guessed at here.

in any case, n≠3.

there is still, however, the problem of the race and gender and age of the interviewers.  that would be essential to know (along with the number!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n≠3.  there were definitely more than 3 raters in the add health surveys.</p>
<p>what kanazawa said was:  <i>&#8220;The physical attractiveness of each Add Health respondent is measured three times by three different interviewers over seven years.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>the &#8220;three times&#8221; refers to the first three waves in the <a href="http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design" rel="nofollow">add health survey</a>.</p>
<p>in <a href="http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave1" rel="nofollow">the first wave</a>, 12,105 adolescents were interviewed for 1-2 hours during a 9 month period.</p>
<p>if all the interviews were 1.5 hours, interviewing 12,105 subjects would amount to over 2270 eight-hour days.</p>
<p>there&#8217;s only ca. 21.6 working days per month on average x 9 months x 3 interviewers = 583 eight hour days.  but you&#8217;d need 12 interviewers to cover 2270 eight-hour days.</p>
<p>and that&#8217;s just in the first wave.  <a href="http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave2" rel="nofollow">wave ii</a> saw 15,000 students interviewed; <a href="http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/wave3" rel="nofollow">wave iii</a>, 15,170.</p>
<p>also, the <a href="http://www.rti.org/page.cfm/Job_Openings" rel="nofollow">fieldworkers used</a> typically work only a 20-25 hour week, so there&#8217;s at least twice the number of interviewers required than i&#8217;ve guessed at here.</p>
<p>in any case, n≠3.</p>
<p>there is still, however, the problem of the race and gender and age of the interviewers.  that would be essential to know (along with the number!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter S. Andriuzzi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11868</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Andriuzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 11:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11868</guid>
		<description>&quot;These are not normal&quot;
Best statistical joke ever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These are not normal&#8221;<br />
Best statistical joke ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 02:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>Ed, thank you for the linkage and the kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, thank you for the linkage and the kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11866</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 22:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11866</guid>
		<description>The &quot;zombie virus&quot; link is futzed, tinkered a moment and it looks like it ought to be

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/05/23/how-a-zombie-virus-became-a-billion-dollar-business/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;zombie virus&#8221; link is futzed, tinkered a moment and it looks like it ought to be</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/05/23/how-a-zombie-virus-became-a-billion-dollar-business/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/05/23/how-a-zombie-virus-became-a-billion-dollar-business/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glidingpig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11865</link>
		<dc:creator>Glidingpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11865</guid>
		<description>&#039;Tyrant leech&#039; and &#039;the spinner of the world’s largest spider-web&#039; are both dead links.

Oh, I should so leave it at that...

I do like your list you put up, always some interesting items in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tyrant leech&#8217; and &#8216;the spinner of the world’s largest spider-web&#8217; are both dead links.</p>
<p>Oh, I should so leave it at that&#8230;</p>
<p>I do like your list you put up, always some interesting items in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S-R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/05/28/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-28-may-2011/#comment-11864</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S-R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 16:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=4636#comment-11864</guid>
		<description>Ahh... another hit of links.  You&#039;ve got me hooked, Ed.  For shame.

(Oh, er, and the Suicide Rates link committed suicide.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh&#8230; another hit of links.  You&#8217;ve got me hooked, Ed.  For shame.</p>
<p>(Oh, er, and the Suicide Rates link committed suicide.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
