DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« March of the titans: fossil teeth show dinosaurs heading for the hills
Hagfish filmed choking sharks with slime, and actively hunting fish »

What happens to your gut bacteria when you eat a yoghurt?

The answer is… not a lot. Well, actually, a bit. Look, it’s complicated. There’s a new study out that tries to answer this question and I’ve written about it for Nature News. Here’s the summary, but do read the full piece – the really interesting thing here is the potential for future experiments that will actually be able to test some of the grandiose claims that adorn yoghurt packets.

Many yoghurts are loaded with live bacteria, and labelled with claims that consuming these microorganisms can be good for your health. But a study published today shows that such yoghurts have only subtle effects on the bacteria already in the gut and do not replace them.

Nathan McNulty, a microbiologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, recruited seven pairs of identical twins, and asked one in each pair to eat twice-daily servings of a popular yoghurt brand containing five strains of bacteria.

By sequencing bacterial DNA in the twins’ stool samples, the team showed that the yoghurt microbes neither took up residence in the volunteers’ guts, nor affected the make-up of the local bacterial communities.

McNulty also fed the five bacterial strains from the yoghurt to ‘gnotobiotic’ mice — animals raised so that the only microorganisms that their guts contain are 15 species found in humans.

As with the twins, the yoghurt bacteria did not change the composition of the rodents’ resident communities. However, the activity of genes that allow the native bacteria to break down carbohydrates did increase.

Meanwhile, if you’re interesting in the bacteria in our guts and bodies, have a look at this introductory slideshow:

<p>You could be sitting alone and still be completely outnumbered for your body is home to trillions upon trillions of tiny passengers – bacteria. Your body is made up of around ten trillion cells, but you harbour <em>a hundred </em>trillion bacteria. For every gene in your genome, there are 100 bacterial ones. This is your ‘microbiome’ and it has a huge impact on your health, your ability to digest food and more. We, in turn, affect them. Everything from the food we eat to the way we’re born influences the species of bacteria that take up residence in our bodies.</p>
<p>This slideshow is a tour through this “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/opinion/20tue4.html?_r=1">universe of us</a>”. Every slide has links to previous pieces that I’ve written on the subject if you want to delve deeper. Or download a podcast of <a href="blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/10/19/i-microbes-my-radio-4-talk-on-the-hordes-of-microbes-inside-us/">my Radio 4 programme on these hidden partners</a>.</p>
<p>Image by David Gregory &amp; Debbie Marshall, Wellcome Images</p><p>To our microbiome, the human body must seem like an entire planet, full of different ecosystems. This is especially true for those that <a title="Permanent Link to The bacterial zoo living on your skin" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2009/05/28/the-bacterial-zoo-living-on-your-skin/">live on our skin</a>. At the microscopic scale, the hairy, moist surface of your armpits is as different from the smooth, dry skin of your forearms as a rainforest is to a desert.</p>
<p>In a thorough survey of our skin microbiome, Elizabeth Grice identified species from at least 205 different genera. Your forearm has the richest community with an average of 44 species, while your nostril, ears and inguinal crease (between leg and groin) are the most stable habitats. Grice also found at bacteria from a specific body part have more in common than those from a specific person. Your butt microbes have more in common with mine than they do with your elbow microbes.</p><p>Despite its diversity, the skin microbiome is a tiny country village compared to the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2010/03/03/the-bacterial-zoo-in-your-bowel/">bustling metropolis inside your bowels</a>. The dark corridors of your intestine house more bacteria than any other part of your body. A team of international scientists led by Junjie Qin and Ruiqiang Li discovered that each of our bowels carries at least 160 bacterial species. Together, our collective guts have just under 3.3 million bacterial genes, more than 150 times as many as reside in our own genomes. They also showed that the gut microbiome of a healthy person looks very different to that of someone with a bowel condition like Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.</p>
<p>Despite this diversity, Peer Bork has shown that the gut bacteria of people from Europe, North American and Japan collapse <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/20/divided-by-language-united-by-gut-bacteria-%e2%80%93-people-have-three-common-gut-types/">into three enterotypes, or gut types</a>. These clusters cut across age, gender, body weight and nationality. Each produces energy in a slightly different way, manufactures a different vitamin and may affect our susceptibility to different diseases.</p>
<p>The quest to understand gut microbes may seem like an arcane niche of science, but it’s actually very important for public health. We rely on these microscopic passengers more than we realise. They harvest energy from our food, provide us with nutrients that would otherwise be denied to us, prevent the growth of harmful bacteria, and more. In many ways, they’re like a forgotten organ. They can also go rogue, changing their community in ways that are linked to obesity or bowel diseases.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Image by Med. Mic. Sciences Cardiff Uni, Wellcome Images</p><p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/baby%e2%80%99s-first-bacteria-depend-on-route-of-delivery/">We inherit our microbiomes from our mother</a>, picking up billions of them as we slide from her largely bacteria-free womb through her microbe-laden vagina. Being slathered in vaginal microbes might not seem like much of a treat but it’s vital for a newborn.</p>
<p>Babies end up with a very different portfolio of skin and gut bacteria depending on how they are delivered. Those who are born naturally harbour a more diverse array of bacteria, which resemble those in their mother’s vagina, including several species that are important for digestion. Those who are delivered by C-section are colonised by a less diverse array of bacteria, including some like <em>Staphylococcus</em> that are picked up from the hospital environment.</p>
<p>These early differences could directly affect a baby’s health for these first colonisers determine which the species that will follow. The bacterial heirlooms that babies inherit from their mothers might act as a shield, preventing more dangerous microbes like from setting up shop. By changing baby’s first bacteria, C-sections could alter the make-up of their later communities, leading to long-term effects on health and nutrition.</p><p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/08/03/you-are-what-you-eat-%e2%80%93-how-your-diet-defines-you-in-trillions-of-ways/">Our microbiome is like a hidden organ</a>, helping us to break down foodstuffs that our own cells cannot cope with. And in turn, our food affects our microbiome. Our first set is laden with genes for digesting milk proteins, allowing us to make full use of our only source of nourishment as babies. Breast milk might even have evolved to nourish the most beneficial bacteria with special sugars.</p>
<p>Just before we move onto solid foods, our microbiome starts activating genes that break down the complex sugars and starches in plants, preparing us for the menu to come. As our diet diversifies, so do our bacteria. They activate genes that use carbohydrates effectively, produce vitamins, and break down unusual and diverse chemicals. As adults, our microbiome becomes relatively stable, but its membership roster depends on the food we eat. The guts of African villagers who eat high-fibre diets are dominated by plant-digesting specialists, which are much rarer in the guts of Europeans who eat high-fat diets.</p><p>Before the age of better food hygiene, our meals used to provide a rich source of foreign bacteria that our microbiome could plunder for genetic tools. Bacteria trade genes as easily as humans trade gifts. For example, the gut bacteria of Japanese people have borrowed genes from a marine species, which now <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/04/07/gut-bacteria-in-japanese-people-borrowed-sushi-digesting-genes-from-ocean-bacteria/">allows them to digest the special carbohydrates in seaweed</a>. The marine bacterium eats seaweed, including the types that are used to make nori, a common sushi ingredient.  In the past, when diners wolfed down morsels of nori, some also swallowed seaweed-eating bacteria, which traded genes with those in their own guts.</p>
<p>This wouldn’t happen nowadays because nori is roasted before being eaten. In fact, processing food presents a blockade to bacteria from the outside world and as a result, Western gut communities have become gentrified. They lack genetic diversity, and they have few ways of increasing it.</p>
<p>Images by Alice Wiegand, Alex Kovach, Tristan Barbeyron and Mirjam Czjzek</p><p>The microbiome is more than just our partners-in-digestion – they affect our health too. They have been linked to a variety of medical conditions, including allergies, immune diseases, and even obesity. For example, the balance of the two major groups – the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes – <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2008/10/06/human-gut-bacteria-linked-to-obesity/">could influence our body weight</a>.</p>
<p>Fat mice and humans have a less diverse milieu of gut bacteria, with a <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience//notrocketscience/2008/12/01/gut-bacteria-fat-or-thin-family-or-friends-shared-or-unique/">greater proportion of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in their bowels</a>. This ratio increases if we eat high-fat diets and falls if we eat low-fat diets. And if the gut bacteria from fat mice are transplanted into mice with no gut bacteria of their own, they can make the new hosts overeat and pile on the pounds. This research suggests that gut bacteria could be manipulating us for their own ends. Some species send out signals that make us hungrier, encourage us to eat more, and affect the way we store fat. And some of our immune genes help to moderate these signals.</p>
<p>As we learn more about our bacterial partners, we might eventually find ways of influencing them to improve our health. This is already happening. In 2008, Alexander Khoruts from the University of Minnesota managed to cure a woman with a “vicious gut infection” by giving her <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13micro.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1">a transplant of her husband’s gut bacteria</a>.</p><p>What happens in the gut doesn’t stay in the gut – it sometimes affects the brain. Animal studies have started to show that the microbiome, from its staging ground in the bowel, can influence the development of its host’s brain.</p>
<p>Rochellys Diaz Heijtz found that <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2011/01/31/gut-bacteria-steer-the-development-of-the-young-brain/">germ-free mice, without any microbiome</a>, were more active, less anxious and less risk-averse than usual. Their brains differed in the activity of over a hundred genes that provide cells with energy, influence chemical communications in the brain and strengthen the connection between nerve cells. Heijtz could even shift her germ-free mice towards “normal” behaviour and genetic activity by giving them a microbiome transplant, but this only worked early in their lives.</p>
<p>But later,  Javier Bravo  at University College Cork managed to<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/08/29/from-guts-to-brains-%e2%80%93-eating-probiotic-bacteria-changes-behaviour-in-mice/"> change the behaviour of normal adult mice</a> by feeding them with a probiotic bacterium  called <span id="apture_prvw1" class="aptureLink"><span class="aptureLinkIcon" style="background-position: right -1348px;"> </span><span class="aptureLink snap_noshots"><em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</em></span></span>,  often found in yoghurts and dairy products. The bacterial menu changed  the levels of signalling chemicals in the rodents’ brains, and reduced  behaviours associated with stress, anxiety and depression.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Gil Sharon found that <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/11/01/gut-bacteria-change-the-sexual-preferences-of-fruit-flies/">gut bacteria can shape the sexual choices of flies</a>. Flies that are raised on diets of starch prefer to mate with other “starch flies” while those raised on maltose prefer “maltose flies”. When Sharon dosed the flies with antibiotics, she killed both their gut bacteria <em>and </em>their sexual preferences. If she inoculated the sterile flies with the microbiome of their peers, their preferences reappeared instantly. It’s possible that the bacteria influence the levels of sex pheromones that affect the fly’s attractiveness.</p>
<p>These studies show that you can’t understand an animal’s evolution simply by considering the evolutionary pressures that act on its genome. You also have to consider the genes of the bacteria and other passengers that live inside it. We’re each like a superorganism – a unified alliance between the genes of several different species, only one of which is human.</p>The teeming masses of the microbiome also contain a record of our evolutionary past. Howard Ochman found that the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/11/16/gut-bacteria-recap-the-evolution-of-apes/">evolution of the gut microbes in great apes</a> perfectly recaps that of their host. The bacteria from the two species of gorilla are more closely related to each other than they are to human gut bacteria. Geography, diet and disease aside, the main thing that influences the members of these bacterial cities is the species of the host. You could reconstruct the evolution of the apes, simply by comparing the bacteria in their bowels.<p>The bacteria of our microbiome are mostly our allies. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/10/13/beneficial-gut-bacteria-can-become-virus-collaborators/">But they can also they can be turned against us.</a> Two new studies in mice have found  that viruses - including one that causes polio, and another that causes cancer - can exploit gut bacteria to infect our bodies.</p>
<p>They use molecules on the bacteria's surfaces as reins, to ride towards host cells, or backstage passes to sneak past the immune system. Our microscopic allies can turn into  unwitting collaborators for dangerous infections.</p>

 

Image by Coda.

 

Share

October 26th, 2011 by Ed Yong in Bacteria, Microbiome | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

8 Responses to “What happens to your gut bacteria when you eat a yoghurt?”

  1. 1.   rosemary lafollette Says:
    October 26th, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    I’m wondering about the rather limited grouping of bacteria in commerical yogurt as compared to a yogurt cultured from raw milk? And I wonder if you looked at the effect of the latter?

  2. 2.   Flippy Doodle Says:
    October 26th, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    The slide show was excellent. Gave me a good solid introduction to the topic.

    I wonder how certain bacteria take a hold in our bodies (like the seaweed one), and some simply pass through (like the yogurt one). And do our gut bacteria get rid of invasive species simply by out-competing them, or do they use something else?

  3. 3.   E. Manhattan Says:
    October 26th, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    A container of warm milk, raw or pasteurized, is a living environment completely unlike any portion of the human gut. Yes, both are warm and wet, but in all other ways they are different habitats. Bacteria evolve to thrive in very specific environments, so it would be quite surprising if yogurt bacteria were flexible enough to live happily in both human guts and containers of warm milk.

    While yogurt is often soothing to an irritated intestine, the bacteria themselves are not likely to be the soothing agents. Researchers have known for a long time that yogurt bacteria do not take up residence in human intestines, but mythology is often stronger than facts – and that myth seems to be very persistent.

  4. 4.   AJ Cann Says:
    October 27th, 2011 at 1:57 am

    Even small changes in gut flora could be significant if this recent research holds up:
    Gut Microbiome Metagenomics Analysis Suggests a Functional Model for the Development of Autoimmunity for Type 1 Diabetes. (2011) PLoS ONE 6(10): e25792
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025792

  5. 5.   Tristan Cogan Says:
    October 27th, 2011 at 6:34 am

    I’ve always wondered why we expect yogurt and probiotic bacteria that aren’t metabolically set up for the human intestine to survive. Bacteria that grow in milk often don’t have a requirement for iron, for instance, as it’s not available to them in milk. Mixing these with competitive iron-hungry bacteria in the more nutrient-rich intestine doesn’t give them a chance. We published a study showing that probiotics can’t respond to iron in the way most gut bacteria can, and I’d like to see whether this could be one of the factors limiting them in colonising humans.

  6. 6.   BJM Says:
    October 27th, 2011 at 8:14 am

    I wonder about the effect of eating yoghurt in people whose intestinal flora have been largely removed by antibiotics or physical cleansing. Does it speed the reestablishment of a healthy bacterial flora?

  7. 7.   E. Manhattan Says:
    October 27th, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    BJM – the answer is no, yogurt bacteria cannot colonize a human intestine, it is a hostile environment for them.

    Close association with other humans who have not used antibiotics recently – the closer and more intimate the better – is currently the fastest way to re-colonize your intestinal flora (and your skin flora) after antibiotic use. As those who study the bacteria of urban surfaces say, “poo is everywhere”. It’s mostly a good thing those beneficial bacteria are spread so easily from person to person, since some of them are symbiotes necessary for our health.

    Physical cleansing, such as using enemas, does not have an appreciable effect on your intestinal flora. Vast numbers of your normal bacteria remain behind on the intestinal walls after the bulky contents are washed out, and the next food which moves through is properly processed.

  8. 8.   Ken Hicks Says:
    October 29th, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    Persons taking antibiotics are, sometimes, advised to consume probiotics to prevent yeast infections. Why?

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • Neurons transplanted into mouse spines reverse chronic pain
      • Virtual resurrection shows that early four-legged animal couldn’t walk very well
      • New sense organ helps giant whales to coordinate the world’s biggest mouthfuls
      • Here’s where all the magic happens
      • Blind mice regain sight after scientists persuade their optic nerves to grow
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (19 May 2012)
      • Meet the paralysed woman who commandeered a robotic arm
      • Deep-sea bacteria redefine life in the slow lane
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us