DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Extending healthy life by getting rid of retired cells
I’ve got your missing links right here (4 November 2011) »

Stunning wren duets are conceived as a whole but sung in two parts

In the mountainous forests of Ecuador, you might hear this fast, lilting song:

The melody sounds like it comes from a single bird, but it is actually sung by two: one male and one female. The couple alternates their syllables with almost unbelievable precision, each one placing its notes in the gaps left by its partner. The result is one of nature’s finest duets. And the singers are a pair of (rather drably named) plain-tailed wrens.

By studying the singing wrens, Eric Fortune from Johns Hopkins University has found that each bird has brain circuits that encode the entire song. Rather than focusing on just their own contribution, they process the whole melody. Their duet is conceived as a whole in both their brains, but emerges as two distinct parts, one from each beak.

Fortune studied the singing birds in the wild. “Before we done the study, we’d never seen the birds and we didn’t know where they lived,” he says. With the help of Ecuadorian naturalists, he found the birds on the side of Antisana volcano, living in thick bamboo thickets that he had to hack through with machetes. “When the birds are nearby, their song is actually painful to hear because it’s extremely loud,” says Fortune. “On the computer, you don’t get a sense of the power it has. It rings in your ear, and because it’s coming from two different locations, it’s very hard to localise.”

Across 15 months, Fortune recorded over 150 hours of wren songs. He noticed that both males and females also sing on their own. Their produce exactly the same notes that they would do in the duet, leaving odd gaps in the places where their partners would fill.

This suggested that the duetting wrens might just be singing their individual parts, relying on faultless timing to stitch the two songs together into one. That’s less of a partnership, and more two birds shouting simultaneously and somehow failing to sing over each other. This idea is consistent with studies in other songbirds but it can’t be the real story for the wrens.

Fortune found that when the birds sing alone, they leave longer gaps than they would do when singing together. This suggests that they tailor the timing of their notes to what their partners are doing, using each syllable as a cue to produce the next one. That became obvious when the males screw up (and they often do). In several of Fortune’s recordings, the males often fumbled their notes in the middle of long sequences. When this happened, the females carried on and left longer gaps than usual between their syllables. It seems the female takes the lead in the duet, setting the rhythm that the male then follows.

The field recordings were intriguing, but Fortune wanted to understand what was happening the birds’ brains when they sang together. To find out, he captured six wrens and played them a variety of tunes, both solos and duets. While they listened, Fortune recorded the activity in their HVC – a part of the songbird brain responsible for learning and producing songs.

The majority of the wrens’ HVC neurons responded more strongly to the full duet than to the individual songs put together. And in both birds, the female syllables trigger stronger responses in the HVC than the male ones. That flies in the face of previous studies: it’s surprising enough that the birds’ HVCs are responding to the songs of other birds at all, let alone more strongly than to their own notes.

Both wrens have clearly encoded the whole duet in their heads, and that both are aware that the female takes the lead. They seem almost wired for cooperation – their brains buzz more strongly when they’re singing together than apart.

Fortune thinks that the same thing could apply to other species. He writes, “Consider, for example, two people cooperating to dance a tango. Certainly each person knows his or her own part of the dance and possibly the partner’s contribution, but these data suggest that premotor circuits in both individuals preferentially encode the combined cooperative behavior.”

Reference: Fortune, Rodriguz, Li, Ball & Coleman. 2011. Neural Mechanisms for the Coordination of Duet Singing in Wrens. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1209867

Photo by Eric Fortune and Melissa Coleman ; graphic by Zina Deretsky

More on birdsong:

  • Hummingbirds dive to sing with their tails
  • Female antbirds jam their partners’ songs when other females approach
Share

November 3rd, 2011 by Ed Yong in Animal behaviour, Animal communication, Animals, Birds | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

8 Responses to “Stunning wren duets are conceived as a whole but sung in two parts”

  1. 1.   electric pretzle Says:
    November 3rd, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    Cant get the player to play. It wont work in any browser; is there another site you can link me to, or a direct link?

  2. 2.   Brian Too Says:
    November 3rd, 2011 at 7:33 pm

    Player worked OK for me. IE 8.

  3. 3.   Solitha Says:
    November 4th, 2011 at 2:34 am

    Works for me in Firefox 7.0.1.

    However, there is a link on the player leading to: http://audioboo.fm/boos/529317-plain-tailed-wren-duet

  4. 4.   Lucide Says:
    November 4th, 2011 at 7:20 am

    Worked for Chrome.

  5. 5.   Mary Wilbur Says:
    November 5th, 2011 at 7:49 am

    How did Fortune record the wrens’ activity in the HVC part of their brains? I doubt the birds survived his curiosity.

  6. 6.   Ed Yong Says:
    November 5th, 2011 at 10:59 am

    Standard electrodes

  7. 7.   Ian Says:
    November 8th, 2011 at 10:10 am

    Assuming there’s some sort of sexual selection going on here, could the speed at which the female sings be some sort of challenge for the male?

    That is, the female sings fast at first and the male tries to keep up, but if he can’t she slows down. How much she has to slow down could determine whether the male ‘gets lucky’ or not. Maybe the female sings with multiple males and picks the best singer to mate with?

  8. 8.   ECollins Says:
    November 9th, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    This is truly amazing. A wonderful story. Mary, I had the same question as you so I searched online for HVC and electrodes. In this study with Zebra finches they implanted the electrodes in the brain. I am not a scientist so I don’t know if there is a non-surgical way to do this study. http://www.pnas.org/content/98/24/14012.full.pdf

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • In a scalding spring, one species of microbe is becoming two
      • Will we ever…? My new column for the BBC
      • Huge set of fossil tracks preserves march of the ancient elephants
      • Flowers regenerated from 30,000-year-old frozen fruits, buried by ancient squirrels
      • Flies drink alcohol to medicate themselves against wasp infections
      • The blue whale – how I met the largest animal that has ever existed
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (18 February 2012)
      • My Sri Lankan adventure – a species list
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us