Sequencing the 99% of Ancient Rome

By Ed Yong | November 11, 2011 9:46 am

I’ve got a piece in CNN’s Light Years blog about Kristina Killgrove‘s cool project to reveal the origins of Ancient Rome’s 99%. Not only is the initiative fascinating, but Killgrove is also raising funds for it herself via the SciFund challenge. Here’s a teaser, but do read the full post at CNN:

From Gibbon to “Gladiator,” it might seem like we know a lot about Ancient Rome, but our view of this civilization is a skewed one. The Romans lived in one of the most stratified societies in history. Around 1.5% of the population controlled the government, military, economy and religion. Through the writings and possessions they left behind, these rich, upper-class men are also responsible for most of our information about Roman life.

The remaining people – commoners, slaves and others – are largely silent. They could not afford tombstones to record their names, and they were buried with little in the way of fancy pottery or jewellery. Their lives were documented by the elites, but they left few documents of their own.

Now, Kristina Killgrove, an archaeologist from Vanderbilt University, wants to tell their story by sequencing their DNA, and she is raising donations to do it. “Their DNA will tell me where these people, who aren’t in histories, were coming from,” she says. “They were quite literally the 99% of Rome.”

Photo by Patrick Reynolds.

Comments (6)

  1. Hemo_jr

    99% of the ancient residents of Rome were not cremated?

  2. Maybe we will find out about a kind of “Take wall street” movement.

    Jaja just kidding

  3. Steve Morrison

    Maybe we will find out about a kind of “Take wall street” movement.

    There was something a bit like it:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secessio_plebis

  4. CB

    But why illustrate a story about Roman remains with a photo of the Paris catacombs?

  5. Because Kristina didn’t have a good shot of her AND the Roman skeletons, and this was the nicer pic. Look just squint and pretend they’re Roman okay? Jeez ;-)

  6. CB

    Ah. OK. NP. I just wondered if there was some implication that the bones in the Paris catacombs were Roman and included in the study, but I thought they were actually medieval – but I’m by no means an expert, I just visited them when in Paris on holiday.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Not Exactly Rocket Science

Dive into the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science news with award-winning writer Ed Yong. No previous experience required.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »