DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« Larger monkey groups lose fights because they contain more deserters
OpenLab: The Renaissance Man, and how to become a scientist over and over again »

Skin bacteria affect how attractive we smell to malarial mosquitoes

Your skin is teeming with bacteria. There are billions of them, living on the dry parched landscapes of your forearms, and the wet, humid forests of your nose. On your feet alone, every square centimetre has around half a million bacteria. These microbes are more than just passengers, hitching a ride on your bodies. They also affect how you smell.

Skin bacteria are our own natural perfumers. They convert chemicals on our skin into those that can easily rise into the air, and different species produce different scents. Without these microbes, we wouldn’t be able to smell each other’s sweat at all. But we’re not the only ones who can sniff these bacterial chemicals. Mosquitoes can too. Niels Verhulst from Wageningen University and Research Centre has just found that the bacteria on our skin can affect our odds of being bitten by a malarial mosquito.

The mosquito that carries malaria – Anopheles gambiae – tracks its victims with an acute sense of smell. It can track the plumes of carbon dioxide that we exhale, and it’s also attracted to the mix of smelly chemicals given off by our skin. We know that some people smell much more attractive to mosquitoes than others. Our diet matters – for example, drinking beer can give our body odour an irresistible allure.

From past experiments, we know that our skin bacteria are also important. Human sweat becomes more enticing to A.gambiae after it is incubated with skin bacteria for a few days. Even on their own, the bacteria can produce airborne chemicals that attract mosquitoes.

These studies were done using bacteria cultured in a laboratory; Verhulst wanted to analyse the microbes on real skin. He rubbed glass beads against the feet of 48 volunteers to sample their scents and offered the beads to captive mosquitoes. Nine of the volunteers proved to be mosquito magnets, while seven others were almost invisible to the blood-suckers.

These two groups had important differences in their skin bacteria. The attractive ones had more bacteria on their feet than the unappealing ones, but they also had a narrower diversity of microbes; their communities were larger, but more gentrified.

Verhulst even managed to identify specific bacteria that drew in or put off the mosquitoes. People with lots of Staphylococcus or Variovorax were more attractive, while those rich in Pseudomonas, Leptotrichia, Delftia and Actinobacteria were not.

It’s not hard to see how these studies could eventually help us to develop new chemicals that attract mosquitoes into traps, or repulse them from humans. But there’s a lot of work to do first. For Verhulst and his team, the most obvious next move is to work out which chemicals the different skin bacteria are giving off.

For example, what is it about the presence of Pseudomonas that shields us from the attention of mosquitoes? Do they produce chemicals that actively repel the insects? Do they break down the attractive compounds of other bacteria or mask their effects? Do they crowd out bacteria like Staphylococcus, which produce more appetising scents? And why do people with more diverse skin bacteria smell less inviting? Perhaps among a larger multitude of species, it’s more likely that one of them secretes chemicals that drive mosquitoes away, or interferes with their sense of smell.

Finally, are people with certain skin bacteria actually more likely to contract malaria? And would it ever be possible to reduce the risk of malaria, or other infectious diseases, by actively changing the communities on our skin to alter the way we smell?

Verhulst’s study demonstrates, yet again, that we are more than just a collection of human cells. We’re also the sum of the bacteria and other microbes that live within us. These legions affect the way we smell, and thus our risk of disease. They, in turn, are affected by us: immune system genes can influence our body odour, perhaps by dictating which bacteria can set up shop on our skin. It is a convenient fiction to talk of ourselves as single creatures; we are really more like a super-organism consisting of hundreds of species, only one of which is human.

Reference: Verhulst, Qiu, Beijleveld, Maliepaard, Knight, Schulz, Berg-Lyons, Lauber, Verduijn, Haasnoot, Mumm, Bouwmeester, Claas, Dicke, van Loon, Takken, Knight & Smallegange. 2011. Composition of Human Skin Microbiota Affects Attractiveness to Malaria Mosquitoes. PLoS ONE http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028991

*******

An introduction to the microbiome

<p>You could be sitting alone and still be completely outnumbered for your body is home to trillions upon trillions of tiny passengers – bacteria. Your body is made up of around ten trillion cells, but you harbour <em>a hundred </em>trillion bacteria. For every gene in your genome, there are 100 bacterial ones. This is your ‘microbiome’ and it has a huge impact on your health, your ability to digest food and more. We, in turn, affect them. Everything from the food we eat to the way we’re born influences the species of bacteria that take up residence in our bodies.</p>
<p>This slideshow is a tour through this “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/opinion/20tue4.html?_r=1">universe of us</a>”. Every slide has links to previous pieces that I’ve written on the subject if you want to delve deeper. Or download a podcast of <a href="blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/10/19/i-microbes-my-radio-4-talk-on-the-hordes-of-microbes-inside-us/">my Radio 4 programme on these hidden partners</a>.</p>
<p>Image by David Gregory &amp; Debbie Marshall, Wellcome Images</p><p>To our microbiome, the human body must seem like an entire planet, full of different ecosystems. This is especially true for those that <a title="Permanent Link to The bacterial zoo living on your skin" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2009/05/28/the-bacterial-zoo-living-on-your-skin/">live on our skin</a>. At the microscopic scale, the hairy, moist surface of your armpits is as different from the smooth, dry skin of your forearms as a rainforest is to a desert.</p>
<p>In a thorough survey of our skin microbiome, Elizabeth Grice identified species from at least 205 different genera. Your forearm has the richest community with an average of 44 species, while your nostril, ears and inguinal crease (between leg and groin) are the most stable habitats. Grice also found at bacteria from a specific body part have more in common than those from a specific person. Your butt microbes have more in common with mine than they do with your elbow microbes.</p><p>Despite its diversity, the skin microbiome is a tiny country village compared to the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2010/03/03/the-bacterial-zoo-in-your-bowel/">bustling metropolis inside your bowels</a>. The dark corridors of your intestine house more bacteria than any other part of your body. A team of international scientists led by Junjie Qin and Ruiqiang Li discovered that each of our bowels carries at least 160 bacterial species. Together, our collective guts have just under 3.3 million bacterial genes, more than 150 times as many as reside in our own genomes. They also showed that the gut microbiome of a healthy person looks very different to that of someone with a bowel condition like Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.</p>
<p>Despite this diversity, Peer Bork has shown that the gut bacteria of people from Europe, North American and Japan collapse <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/04/20/divided-by-language-united-by-gut-bacteria-%e2%80%93-people-have-three-common-gut-types/">into three enterotypes, or gut types</a>. These clusters cut across age, gender, body weight and nationality. Each produces energy in a slightly different way, manufactures a different vitamin and may affect our susceptibility to different diseases.</p>
<p>The quest to understand gut microbes may seem like an arcane niche of science, but it’s actually very important for public health. We rely on these microscopic passengers more than we realise. They harvest energy from our food, provide us with nutrients that would otherwise be denied to us, prevent the growth of harmful bacteria, and more. In many ways, they’re like a forgotten organ. They can also go rogue, changing their community in ways that are linked to obesity or bowel diseases.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Image by Med. Mic. Sciences Cardiff Uni, Wellcome Images</p><p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/baby%e2%80%99s-first-bacteria-depend-on-route-of-delivery/">We inherit our microbiomes from our mother</a>, picking up billions of them as we slide from her largely bacteria-free womb through her microbe-laden vagina. Being slathered in vaginal microbes might not seem like much of a treat but it’s vital for a newborn.</p>
<p>Babies end up with a very different portfolio of skin and gut bacteria depending on how they are delivered. Those who are born naturally harbour a more diverse array of bacteria, which resemble those in their mother’s vagina, including several species that are important for digestion. Those who are delivered by C-section are colonised by a less diverse array of bacteria, including some like <em>Staphylococcus</em> that are picked up from the hospital environment.</p>
<p>These early differences could directly affect a baby’s health for these first colonisers determine which the species that will follow. The bacterial heirlooms that babies inherit from their mothers might act as a shield, preventing more dangerous microbes like from setting up shop. By changing baby’s first bacteria, C-sections could alter the make-up of their later communities, leading to long-term effects on health and nutrition.</p><p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/08/03/you-are-what-you-eat-%e2%80%93-how-your-diet-defines-you-in-trillions-of-ways/">Our microbiome is like a hidden organ</a>, helping us to break down foodstuffs that our own cells cannot cope with. And in turn, our food affects our microbiome. Our first set is laden with genes for digesting milk proteins, allowing us to make full use of our only source of nourishment as babies. Breast milk might even have evolved to nourish the most beneficial bacteria with special sugars.</p>
<p>Just before we move onto solid foods, our microbiome starts activating genes that break down the complex sugars and starches in plants, preparing us for the menu to come. As our diet diversifies, so do our bacteria. They activate genes that use carbohydrates effectively, produce vitamins, and break down unusual and diverse chemicals. As adults, our microbiome becomes relatively stable, but its membership roster depends on the food we eat. The guts of African villagers who eat high-fibre diets are dominated by plant-digesting specialists, which are much rarer in the guts of Europeans who eat high-fat diets.</p><p>Before the age of better food hygiene, our meals used to provide a rich source of foreign bacteria that our microbiome could plunder for genetic tools. Bacteria trade genes as easily as humans trade gifts. For example, the gut bacteria of Japanese people have borrowed genes from a marine species, which now <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/04/07/gut-bacteria-in-japanese-people-borrowed-sushi-digesting-genes-from-ocean-bacteria/">allows them to digest the special carbohydrates in seaweed</a>. The marine bacterium eats seaweed, including the types that are used to make nori, a common sushi ingredient.  In the past, when diners wolfed down morsels of nori, some also swallowed seaweed-eating bacteria, which traded genes with those in their own guts.</p>
<p>This wouldn’t happen nowadays because nori is roasted before being eaten. In fact, processing food presents a blockade to bacteria from the outside world and as a result, Western gut communities have become gentrified. They lack genetic diversity, and they have few ways of increasing it.</p>
<p>Images by Alice Wiegand, Alex Kovach, Tristan Barbeyron and Mirjam Czjzek</p><p>The microbiome is more than just our partners-in-digestion – they affect our health too. They have been linked to a variety of medical conditions, including allergies, immune diseases, and even obesity. For example, the balance of the two major groups – the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes – <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/06/23/2008/10/06/human-gut-bacteria-linked-to-obesity/">could influence our body weight</a>.</p>
<p>Fat mice and humans have a less diverse milieu of gut bacteria, with a <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience//notrocketscience/2008/12/01/gut-bacteria-fat-or-thin-family-or-friends-shared-or-unique/">greater proportion of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in their bowels</a>. This ratio increases if we eat high-fat diets and falls if we eat low-fat diets. And if the gut bacteria from fat mice are transplanted into mice with no gut bacteria of their own, they can make the new hosts overeat and pile on the pounds. This research suggests that gut bacteria could be manipulating us for their own ends. Some species send out signals that make us hungrier, encourage us to eat more, and affect the way we store fat. And some of our immune genes help to moderate these signals.</p>
<p>As we learn more about our bacterial partners, we might eventually find ways of influencing them to improve our health. This is already happening. In 2008, Alexander Khoruts from the University of Minnesota managed to cure a woman with a “vicious gut infection” by giving her <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13micro.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1">a transplant of her husband’s gut bacteria</a>.</p><p>What happens in the gut doesn’t stay in the gut – it sometimes affects the brain. Animal studies have started to show that the microbiome, from its staging ground in the bowel, can influence the development of its host’s brain.</p>
<p>Rochellys Diaz Heijtz found that <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2011/01/31/gut-bacteria-steer-the-development-of-the-young-brain/">germ-free mice, without any microbiome</a>, were more active, less anxious and less risk-averse than usual. Their brains differed in the activity of over a hundred genes that provide cells with energy, influence chemical communications in the brain and strengthen the connection between nerve cells. Heijtz could even shift her germ-free mice towards “normal” behaviour and genetic activity by giving them a microbiome transplant, but this only worked early in their lives.</p>
<p>But later,  Javier Bravo  at University College Cork managed to<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/08/29/from-guts-to-brains-%e2%80%93-eating-probiotic-bacteria-changes-behaviour-in-mice/"> change the behaviour of normal adult mice</a> by feeding them with a probiotic bacterium  called <span id="apture_prvw1" class="aptureLink"><span class="aptureLinkIcon" style="background-position: right -1348px;"> </span><span class="aptureLink snap_noshots"><em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</em></span></span>,  often found in yoghurts and dairy products. The bacterial menu changed  the levels of signalling chemicals in the rodents’ brains, and reduced  behaviours associated with stress, anxiety and depression.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Gil Sharon found that <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/11/01/gut-bacteria-change-the-sexual-preferences-of-fruit-flies/">gut bacteria can shape the sexual choices of flies</a>. Flies that are raised on diets of starch prefer to mate with other “starch flies” while those raised on maltose prefer “maltose flies”. When Sharon dosed the flies with antibiotics, she killed both their gut bacteria <em>and </em>their sexual preferences. If she inoculated the sterile flies with the microbiome of their peers, their preferences reappeared instantly. It’s possible that the bacteria influence the levels of sex pheromones that affect the fly’s attractiveness.</p>
<p>These studies show that you can’t understand an animal’s evolution simply by considering the evolutionary pressures that act on its genome. You also have to consider the genes of the bacteria and other passengers that live inside it. We’re each like a superorganism – a unified alliance between the genes of several different species, only one of which is human.</p>The teeming masses of the microbiome also contain a record of our evolutionary past. Howard Ochman found that the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/notrocketscience/2010/11/16/gut-bacteria-recap-the-evolution-of-apes/">evolution of the gut microbes in great apes</a> perfectly recaps that of their host. The bacteria from the two species of gorilla are more closely related to each other than they are to human gut bacteria. Geography, diet and disease aside, the main thing that influences the members of these bacterial cities is the species of the host. You could reconstruct the evolution of the apes, simply by comparing the bacteria in their bowels.<p>The bacteria of our microbiome are mostly our allies. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/10/13/beneficial-gut-bacteria-can-become-virus-collaborators/">But they can also they can be turned against us.</a> Two new studies in mice have found  that viruses - including one that causes polio, and another that causes cancer - can exploit gut bacteria to infect our bodies.</p>
<p>They use molecules on the bacteria's surfaces as reins, to ride towards host cells, or backstage passes to sneak past the immune system. Our microscopic allies can turn into  unwitting collaborators for dangerous infections.</p>

Share

December 28th, 2011 Tags: Bacteria, Malaria, microbiome, Mosquitoes, skin, smell
by Ed Yong in Bacteria, Insects, Malaria, Medicine & health, Microbiome, Mosquitoes | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

6 Responses to “Skin bacteria affect how attractive we smell to malarial mosquitoes”

  1. 1.   Mark O. Martin Says:
    December 28th, 2011 at 11:59 pm

    This is a very cool story, outlining the cloud of metabolites with which we are surrounded, and the role of the microbes associated with us on its composition. Sometimes the metabolites can act as “signals” in interesting ways. This has been seen in insect-insect interactions, for example: specific microbes living within aphids generate a chemical “cue” (a kairomone) that attracts predators:

    http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2011/11/ringing-a-microbial-dinner-bell.html

    So I wonder what other roles microbes can have…even beyond an attractiveness to mosquitoes in humans!

    Great essay, Mr. Yong!

  2. 2.   HappyPig Says:
    December 29th, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    Nifty. I can’t wait until a subsequent paper breaks down the results into the mosquito attractiveness of various Staphylococcus species. S. epidermidis uses its quorum sensing system to block S. aureus from the skin, so I wonder if there’s a differential in mosquito attraction between the two species of Staph.

  3. 3.   Lynn Jaeger Says:
    December 29th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    We’ve known for years that the way we smell determines how attractive we are to mosquitos. Years ago, on planning a canoe trip down the Colorado River, my husband began taking extra doses of B-complex vitamins. While his clothing came home smelling like a pharmacist’s, he wasn’t bitten at all, while his companions were covered in bites. And here in the States, at least, a common skin lotion – Avon Skin-So-Soft – is touted as a mosquito repellant as effective as the more noxious DEET concoctions sold over the counter.
    That this phenomenon occurs with naturally-occuring skin microbes is very interesting. Will be looking for a “natural” mosquito repelling “germ lotion” to hit the market as soon as they can figure the details out. Only downside I can see is that it might not be suitable for those who are immunocompromised – as with AIDS. Slathering germs all over one’s body might be just asking for an infection. And then there is the question of whether the smell is repellant to humans around you, too. My husband’s sweat was nasty for several weeks after he got home from the river …

  4. 4.   Ms. Goulet Says:
    December 29th, 2011 at 11:44 pm

    It’d be cool to make a lotion to transform the resident bacteria on your skin to the non smelly kind, thereby making you invisible to mosquitoes. I’d imagine it’d be easy once you know which genes code for the smelly proteins.

  5. 5.   Ug Says:
    December 30th, 2011 at 6:01 am

    Lynn,
    They probably wont make a “germ lotion” but instead figure out the chemicals that those germs are producing that act as a repelent and base some kind of lotion or spray from that.

  6. 6.   Miss Shell Says:
    January 3rd, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    I’ve always wondered about people with chronic conditions, such as those with auto-immune deseases, being more attracitve to mosquitoes – that mosquitoes somehow can sense weaker targets.

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • In a scalding spring, one species of microbe is becoming two
      • Will we ever…? My new column for the BBC
      • Huge set of fossil tracks preserves march of the ancient elephants
      • Flowers regenerated from 30,000-year-old frozen fruits, buried by ancient squirrels
      • Flies drink alcohol to medicate themselves against wasp infections
      • The blue whale – how I met the largest animal that has ever existed
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (18 February 2012)
      • My Sri Lankan adventure – a species list
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us