DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Not Exactly Rocket Science
« How I became we, which became I again
Every scientists-versus-journalists debate ever, in one diagram »

Starfish go five ways, but two ways when stressed

A typical starfish has five-sided symmetry. With no clear head, the starfish can move in any direction, led by any one of its five arms. If you were feeling particularly cruel, you could fold one up in five different ways, so each half fitted exactly on top of the other. We humans, like many other animals, have only two-sided symmetry. We’re ‘bilateral’ – our right half mirrors our left, and we have an obvious head.

These two body plans might look radically different, but looks can be deceiving. Chengcheng Ji and Liang Wu from the China Agricultural University have found that starfish have hidden bilateral tendencies, which reveal themselves under times of stress.

Starfish belong to a group of animals called echinoderms, which also include sea urchins, sea cucumbers, brittlestars. As adults, most of the group have five-sided symmetry. As larvae, they’re very different. A baby starfish looks entirely unlike a star and rather like an alien spacecraft, with tentacle-like prongs sticking out from a central bell. The whole structure has a head and is very clearly bilateral. Their five-sided symmetry only emerges when they grow up, but Ji and Wu think that starfish never forget their two-sided beginnings.

The duo studied over a thousand starfish, and exposed them to various challenges to see how they would react. First, they dropped the animals in a new tank of water, waited for them to crawl away, and noted which arms they led with. Next, they turned the animals over. An upside-down starfish pushes two arms against the ground for support and stamps down with the opposite one to flip itself back up. Ji and Wu recorded which arms they led with. Finally, they put the starfish in a shallow tank and dropped an irritating liquid on their backs. Again, as the animals fled, Ji and Wu noted the arms that led the way.

These three challenges revealed that starfish have a hidden bilateral symmetry, and move in a preferred direction. That’s especially obvious when they face stressful situations, such as fleeing or having to turn themselves over.

They tend to lead with the fifth arm. There are many ways of numbering the arms, but here’s what Ji and Wu used. Starfish have a small wart-like valve called a madreporite, which allows water into their bodies. It sits in the central disc, but off to one side. The arm opposite the madreporite is arm number 1, and the rest are numbered clockwise. And it’s the fifth one that usually leads the way. It’s as close to a head as the starfish has.

Ji and Wu think that this hint of bilateral symmetry is a faint vestige of the body that starfish have as larvae. If they have a preferred direction, they could potentially make faster decisions in times of danger.

Ji and Wu now want to see if other aspects of a starfish’s body also conform to this hidden symmetry. For example, the starfish’s brain is spread throughout its body. It has a ring of nerves in its central disc, with spokes branching off into each of the arms. Perhaps these nerves are slightly more concentrated towards the fifth arm, just as our nerves are more concentrated inside our skulls.

Reference: Ji, C., Wu, L., Zhao, W., Wang, S., & Lv, J. (2012). Echinoderms Have Bilateral Tendencies PLoS ONE, 7 (1) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028978

Photos by Nick Hobgood and authors.

 

 

More on echinoderms:

  • Fishing bans protect coral reefs from devastating predatory starfish
  • Sand dollars avoid predators by cloning themselves
  • Sea urchins use their entire body as an eye
  • Pocket Science: Stealth mode in the sea
Share

January 17th, 2012 by Ed Yong in Anatomy, Animal behaviour, Animals, Echinoderms, Invertebrates | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

3 Responses to “Starfish go five ways, but two ways when stressed”

  1. 1.   nakshatra Says:
    January 18th, 2012 at 6:25 am

    I would like a clarification… how is it possible to drop an irritating liquid in a water tank? as in how is it felt by the star fish, and how does liquid irritate the starfish?

  2. 2.   Ziblink Says:
    January 19th, 2012 at 5:24 am

    @nakshatra: Even water based liquids don’t dissipate immediately in contact with water and the liquid is likely more dense than the surrounding liquid, allowing it to sink, This can be seen if you drop some dyed sugar solution into a glass of water, it can take considerable time for the two liquids to intermingle.

    There are a variety of substances that could irritate a starfish as there are many solutions that cause skin irritation in humans.

  3. 3.   nakshatra Says:
    January 23rd, 2012 at 12:12 am

    I tried it out!Thank you Ziblink for the experiment and explanation!

Leave a Reply





    • About Not Exactly Rocket Science



      Ed Yong is an award-winning British science writer. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Times, WIRED, the Guardian, Nature and more. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to talk about the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science to as many people as possible.

      My personal website with biography, other writing, speaking engagements, and more

      Some interviews with me
      Some awards that I’ve won
      Who my readers are: 2008, 2009 and 2010 editions
      A complete list of posts from this blog

      Follow me on Twitter or Google+

      Contact me on edyong209[at]googlemail[dot]com

    • Support science writers


      Every month, I choose ten excellent blog posts and donate £3 to their authors. If you want to join me in supporting great science writing, use the first button. Any donations in June will be split evenly between these ten writers.

      If you would like to support this blog in particular, use the second button. For anything you donate, I will match a third and donate it to the month's chosen writers.

    • What others say

      "One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

      "One of the smartest science bloggers I read... a prime practitioner among the new generation of scientifically authoritative bloggers" - David Rowan, editor of Wired UK

      "Engaging and jargon-free multimedia storytelling about science and the digital age" - National Academy of Sciences

      "A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

      "Head and shoulders above many broadsheet hacks" - Ben Goldacre

      "Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

      "Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

    • Do you want to be a science writer?

      Read origin stories and advice from over 130 science writers from around the world.
    • Not Exactly Rocket Science content

      RSS Recent Posts

      Recent Posts

      • In a scalding spring, one species of microbe is becoming two
      • Will we ever…? My new column for the BBC
      • Huge set of fossil tracks preserves march of the ancient elephants
      • Flowers regenerated from 30,000-year-old frozen fruits, buried by ancient squirrels
      • Flies drink alcohol to medicate themselves against wasp infections
      • The blue whale – how I met the largest animal that has ever existed
      • I’ve got your missing links right here (18 February 2012)
      • My Sri Lankan adventure – a species list
      Categories

      Categories

      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
    • RSS Twitter

    • My wife, who makes it all possible

      Alice.jpg
    • Blogroll

      Science blogs

      Science blogs

      • 80 Beats
      • A Blog Around the Clock
      • Adventures in Ethics and Science
      • Aetiology
      • Alice Bell
      • Ars Technica
      • Arthropoda
      • Atlantic Science
      • Babel's Dawn
      • Bad Astronomy
      • Bad Science
      • BPS Research Digest Blog
      • Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
      • Child's Play
      • Cocktail Party Physics
      • Collision Detection
      • Culture Dish
      • Culturing Science
      • Deep Sea News
      • Discoblog + NCBI ROFL
      • Dot Earth
      • Dr Petra Boynton
      • Drugmonkey
      • EarthLab
      • Embargo Watch
      • Epiphenom
      • Evolving Thoughts
      • Finite Attention Span
      • Fistful of Science
      • Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview
      • Gene Expression
      • Genetic Future
      • Genomeboy
      • Genomicron
      • Gimpy's Blog
      • Highly Allochthonous
      • Ionian Enchantment
      • JL Vernon Presents American Psico
      • Joanne Loves Science
      • John Pavlus
      • Just a Theory
      • Lab Rat
      • Laelaps
      • Last Word on Nothing
      • Lay Scientist
      • Loom
      • Mark Changizi
      • Mind Hacks
      • Myrmecos
      • Neuroanthropology
      • Neurologica
      • Neuron Culture
      • Neurophilosophy
      • Neurotic Physiology (SciCurious)
      • Neurotribes
      • Obesity Panacea
      • Observations of a Nerd
      • On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess
      • Open Minds and Parachutes
      • Political Science (Evan Harris)
      • Predictably Irrational
      • Retraction Watch
      • Save Your Breath for Running Ponies
      • Schooner of Science
      • Science Punk
      • ScienceLine
      • ScienceLush
      • Sentence First
      • Sex, Drugs and Rockin' Venom – Confessions of an Extreme Scientist
      • Skepchick
      • Speakeasy Science
      • Superbug
      • Take as Directed
      • Terra Sigillata
      • Tetrapod Zoology
      • The Artful Amoeba
      • The Chicken or the Egg
      • The Examining Room of Dr Charles
      • The Flying Trilobite
      • The Frontal Cortex
      • The Gleaming Retort
      • The Great Beyond
      • The Intersection
      • The Inverse Square Blog
      • The Millikan Daily
      • The Primate Diaries
      • The Science Project
      • Thoughtomics
      • Thus Spake Zuska
      • TYWKIWDBI
      • Vagina Dentata
      • Voyages Around my Camera
      • Weird Bug Lady
      • White Coat Underground
      • Why Evolution is True
      • Wild Muse
      • Wired Science
      • Words of Science
      • XKCD
      • Zooillogix
      Other blogs

      Other blogs

      • Cafe Philos
      • Miss Cellania
    • NetworkedBlogs
      Blog:
      Not Exactly Rocket Science
      Topics:
      science, biology, news
       
      Follow my blog


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us