<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tunes without composers: music naturally evolves on DarwinTunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Beheim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15335</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Beheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15335</guid>
		<description>Several of the commenters are missing the value of this project to evolutionary anthropology.  MacCallum and his team have shown how cumulative cultural transmission can operate just like plant and animal domestication.  Random variation is culled by human preferences to produce new design.  Very cool stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several of the commenters are missing the value of this project to evolutionary anthropology.  MacCallum and his team have shown how cumulative cultural transmission can operate just like plant and animal domestication.  Random variation is culled by human preferences to produce new design.  Very cool stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15334</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15334</guid>
		<description>Not quite useless.  It illustrates that a combination of random variation and selection can produce an adaption--in this case, a tune that people like.    Not exactly surprising, but many creationists have trouble grasping it.   They will probably dismiss this by arguing that the selection came from intelligent listeners, which is true, but misses the point.

So come to think of it, it is useless.   Nothing will convince a creationist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite useless.  It illustrates that a combination of random variation and selection can produce an adaption&#8211;in this case, a tune that people like.    Not exactly surprising, but many creationists have trouble grasping it.   They will probably dismiss this by arguing that the selection came from intelligent listeners, which is true, but misses the point.</p>
<p>So come to think of it, it is useless.   Nothing will convince a creationist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15333</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15333</guid>
		<description>Well, I always suspected that Steve Reich and Philip Glass were just computers in disguise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I always suspected that Steve Reich and Philip Glass were just computers in disguise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter S. Andriuzzi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15332</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Andriuzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15332</guid>
		<description>Gotta agree with Michael Scott Cuthbert and Rangutan: this research is useless. Kinda cool, but useless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta agree with Michael Scott Cuthbert and Rangutan: this research is useless. Kinda cool, but useless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradbell.tv</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15331</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbell.tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15331</guid>
		<description>It provides no proof of anything musical or evolutionary or scientific or perceptual or anything! It&#039;s brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It provides no proof of anything musical or evolutionary or scientific or perceptual or anything! It&#8217;s brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15330</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15330</guid>
		<description>Is this really an example of evolution? These iterations had an end goal, something palatable to the human ear. Evolution yes, but not precisely. If I have a big and diverse bowl of food and spices and I make some chicken curry with rice pilaf, the food didnt evolve.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this really an example of evolution? These iterations had an end goal, something palatable to the human ear. Evolution yes, but not precisely. If I have a big and diverse bowl of food and spices and I make some chicken curry with rice pilaf, the food didnt evolve&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GWhiz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15329</link>
		<dc:creator>GWhiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15329</guid>
		<description>The random starting point and the random mutations are what is guiding this more than peoples choices. If the scope of the random mutations possible was different, the tune would evolve differently, very significantly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The random starting point and the random mutations are what is guiding this more than peoples choices. If the scope of the random mutations possible was different, the tune would evolve differently, very significantly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15328</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15328</guid>
		<description>the little bass part on the final generation, at 21 and 29 seconds, is very awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the little bass part on the final generation, at 21 and 29 seconds, is very awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rangutan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15327</link>
		<dc:creator>Rangutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15327</guid>
		<description>Boring!
Like for colours and patterns, there is a limited amount of interesting tones and tunes!
My view: this is a waist of precious time.
GRR2012 :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boring!<br />
Like for colours and patterns, there is a limited amount of interesting tones and tunes!<br />
My view: this is a waist of precious time.<br />
GRR2012 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mode</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/18/tunes-without-composers-music-naturally-evolves-on-darwintunes/#comment-15326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7108#comment-15326</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Geinoh Yamashirogumi...
Just... awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Geinoh Yamashirogumi&#8230;<br />
Just&#8230; awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
