<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#039;ve got your missing links right here (23 June 2012)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/23/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-23-june-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/23/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-23-june-2012/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/23/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-23-june-2012/#comment-15356</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7142#comment-15356</guid>
		<description>Gah, what the hell is &lt;i&gt;wrong&lt;/i&gt; with Australian Popular Science? (The site, not the actual science.)

This is the second time I know of that a perfectly-formed link has pointed to an article that has disappeared. I know that your link to the Climate Wars article was correct, because it is still on Google&#039;s cache. However, the article itself has been removed from the popsci.com.au site, and now delivers a &quot;Page Not Found&quot; error. Exactly the same thing happened with an article you linked to last week.

What on earth do they think they&#039;re up to? Is it worth even bothering to link to popsci.com.au articles?

[Note: Excerpts from the article can be found at http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/06/21/popular-science-reviews-denialistswar-on-climate-scientists/ ] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, what the hell is <i>wrong</i> with Australian Popular Science? (The site, not the actual science.)</p>
<p>This is the second time I know of that a perfectly-formed link has pointed to an article that has disappeared. I know that your link to the Climate Wars article was correct, because it is still on Google&#8217;s cache. However, the article itself has been removed from the popsci.com.au site, and now delivers a &#8220;Page Not Found&#8221; error. Exactly the same thing happened with an article you linked to last week.</p>
<p>What on earth do they think they&#8217;re up to? Is it worth even bothering to link to popsci.com.au articles?</p>
<p>[Note: Excerpts from the article can be found at <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/06/21/popular-science-reviews-denialistswar-on-climate-scientists/" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/06/21/popular-science-reviews-denialistswar-on-climate-scientists/</a> ] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZL 'Kai' Burington</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/23/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-23-june-2012/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>ZL 'Kai' Burington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7142#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>As an alternative to the typical Gigapan gigapixel photos, check out this: http://gigamacro.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an alternative to the typical Gigapan gigapixel photos, check out this: <a href="http://gigamacro.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gigamacro.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/06/23/ive-got-your-missing-links-right-here-23-june-2012/#comment-15354</link>
		<dc:creator>Critter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7142#comment-15354</guid>
		<description>When clicking the links, Norton flagged http://neuroskeptic.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/brains-are-different-on-macs.html as a page connected with fraudulent activity, and had a warning about phishing. Wasn&#039;t sure if you were aware of that or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When clicking the links, Norton flagged <a href="http://neuroskeptic.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/brains-are-different-on-macs.html" rel="nofollow">http://neuroskeptic.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/brains-are-different-on-macs.html</a> as a page connected with fraudulent activity, and had a warning about phishing. Wasn&#8217;t sure if you were aware of that or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
