The deadliest sea snake is actually two look-alike species

By Ed Yong | November 20, 2012 9:00 am

Sea snakes have some of the most potent venoms of any snake, but most of the 60 or so species are docile, rare, or sparing with their venom. The beaked sea snake (Enhydrina schistosa) is an exception. It lives throughout Asia and Australasia, has a reputation for being aggressive, and swims in estuaries and lagoons where it often gets entangled in fishing nets. Unwary fishermen get injected with venom that’s more potent than a cobra’s or a rattlesnake’s. It’s perhaps unsurprising that this one species accounts for the vast majority of injuries and deaths from sea snake bites.

But this deadliest of sea snakes has a secret: it’s actually two sea snakes.

By analysing the beaked sea snake’s genes, Kanishka Ukuwela from the University of Adelaide has shown that the Asian individuals belong to a completely different branch of the sea snake family tree than the Australian ones. They are two species, which have evolved to look so identical that until now, everyone thought they were the same. They’re a fantastic new example of convergent evolution, when different species turn up at life’s party wearing the same clothes.

More and more, scientists are using genetic studies to show that familiar animals are actually several different “cryptic species”, including killer whales and giraffes. Just last year, we learned that the famous Nile crocodile is actually two distinct crocodiles, a big one from east Africa and a small one from west Africa.

Like other members of this club, no one suspected that the beaked sea snake was actually two species. Bryan Fry from the University of Queensland, venom guru and co-author on the paper, had collected several individuals from Australia, to study their venom. (“They are the nastiest species of sea snake I’ve ever worked with,” he says. “That is another thing they both converge on!”)

As a matter of routine, he “barcodes” the DNA of every animal he collects, sequencing it at specific places that given away the identity of different species. Fry expected the genes of his Australian specimens to be similar to those of the Asian individuals. “When the first result came back, we thought we must have screwed up and ran a sample of [a different] sea snake,” says Fry. “So we re-ran it, and got the same results. That was when we started getting giddy.” And just like that, one sea snake became two.

The team examined the genes of 11 snakes from Asia and Australia, at seven different parts of their genome, and compared these sequences to those of other sea snakes. They reconstructed a family tree showing the evolutionary relationships of the group, which you can see it below. The Australian individuals lie in a set of branches at the top, and are most closely related to other Australian species. The ones from Sri Lanka and South-East Asia lie on an unconnected branch in the middle of the tree, with other Asian sea-snakes as their closest kin.

For now, the team suggests that the old species name of E.schistosa belongs to the Asian serpents, while the Australian ones get the new name of Enhydrina zweifeli (which had been used before to describe a single specimen captured from New Guinea.). The team also thinks that both species should lose their genus name of Enhydrina, since they are both deeply embedded within the Hydrophis genus. They would be reborn as Hydrophis schistosa and Hydrophis zwefeli.

Physically, the two species look slightly different. E.schistosa has fewer stripes, a slightly lower scale count, and subtle differences in its skull structure. But both have a deep notch between the two halves of their lower jaws, creating the “beaked” snouts that the “species” was named for. It’s thought that this notch helps them to widen their jaws even further than other sea snakes, to swallow the spiny catfish and puffer fishes that they prey upon. It’s possible that both lineages of snake took to eating these spiny mouthfuls, and both evolved deceptively similar jaws as a result.

Fortunately, even though the only anti-venom that we have was developed to counteract the Asian species, through a fluke, it also works against the venom of the Australian one.

This is just one of three separate sea snake discoveries that the team have made this year—and each one resulted in a new species!

In February, they captured nine specimens of a new sea snake, Hydrophis donaldi, with spiky scales on its belly.

In August, they showed that the known species Aipysurus eydouxii was actually two separate (but closely related) sea snakes. The two populations are separated by the deep Timor Trench, which cuts Australia away from Southeast Asia, and the team gave the Australian species a new name—A.mosaicus (the mosaic sea snake). Danish colleagues had originally identified A.mosaicus from specimens languishing in jars within a local museum (where new species are often found and described). Fry and Sanders then collected living individuals, and sealed the reclassification.

Both of these animals, and the newly coined E.zweifeli have been found in the Gulf of Carpentaria, between northern Australia and southern New Guinea. “Three new species all from the same location!” says Fry.  “There’s an insane biodiversity of sea snakes that has been neglected.”

Reference: Ukuwela, de Silva, Mumpuni, Fry, Lee & Sanders. 2012. Molecular evidence that the deadliest sea snake Enhydrina schistosa (Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) consists of two convergent species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Comments (6)

  1. Cmdr. Awesome

    Is there any indication of how likely it is that both species’ venom would be counterable with the same agent? For instance, do sea snakes in general share a limited number of venom types which are structurally similar across the board, or is this just a wildly unlikely event?

    Actually, this leads to a second venom-ignorant question – how different are variations of the same type of venom – is it common for two venoms of the same general type (say, two haemotoxins or two neurotoxins), but produced by two different species, to be directly counterable by the same antivenin?

  2. I’m a little surprised these were ever seen as the same species given the pictures you show, which show dramatic coloration differences, and clear differences in the shape of the head. Were such things not taken into account previously?

  3. @Cmdr Awesome. Good Q. From the paper:

    “However, a key aspect of sea snake venom evolution, that has prevented this misidentification from having catastrophic medical implications, is that all sea snake venoms are very streamlined due to feeding on a single higher taxon (bony fish) (Fry et al., 2003). Consequently all sea snake venoms tested to-date have been well-neutralised by the only available antivenom”

    @R. E. Hunter – It’s not uncommon for different populations of the same species to have distinct colour schemes or physical features. I think the chin scale – found in only these species and no others – was a red herring.

  4. Cmdr. Awesome

    Ahhh, cool beans. Thanks :)

    As an aside I’m so used to papers in general being paywalled that I didn’t even click the link to see if this one was. Silly me, and apologies for not doing my own research there.

  5. Winterwind

    Fascinating. Also I think this is my new favourite definition of convergent evolution: “… when different species turn up at life’s party wearing the same clothes.”

  6. Very interesting all this… I was hoping to have a look at the seasnakes around Bali, where I live Lindley McKay reckons there might be around 15 species of sea snakes around Bali, but the work has not yet been done. To this end, I was wondering how I might procure some funding (any offers??) to go out with the fishermen at night, using a net and a bright light to catch sea snakes. While I am confident in using a grab and stick to catch and restain venomous terrestrial snakes here, I was wondering whether there are any additional hazards to be aware of when actually lifting sea snakes out of the sea and into a boat for closer inspection (apart from there being no sea snake antivenom here in Indonesia!). Bryan and others – any helpful tips? Thanks!


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Not Exactly Rocket Science

Dive into the awe-inspiring, beautiful and quirky world of science news with award-winning writer Ed Yong. No previous experience required.

See More

Collapse bottom bar

Login to your Account

E-mail address:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »