<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are stabby mantis shrimps so much slower than punchy ones?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Tubb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/#comment-16427</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Tubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7989#comment-16427</guid>
		<description>This article got me thinking... energy gets stored when you snap your fingers, too. Which begs the question: how fast does a human middle finger get when snapped against the pad of the thumb?

Well, there&#039;s video here of a finger snap at 2000 frames a second: http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/hsvideo/snap.wmv

It&#039;s not perfect, but the period from the middle finger leaving the thumb to smacking the pad is something in the range of 12 and 20 frames (starts at about frame -10 and ends somewhere between frame 2 and frame 10).

That&#039;s 12-20 frames over a distance of, say, 5 cm. That works out to 6 - 10 ms over 5 cm, which works out to between 5 and 8 m/sec.

As a ballpark guess, I&#039;d say that&#039;s not too shabby. The speed of the finger likely peaks a fair bit faster than that. Somebody grab a high speed camera and a ruler!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article got me thinking&#8230; energy gets stored when you snap your fingers, too. Which begs the question: how fast does a human middle finger get when snapped against the pad of the thumb?</p>
<p>Well, there&#8217;s video here of a finger snap at 2000 frames a second: <a href="http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/hsvideo/snap.wmv" rel="nofollow">http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/hsvideo/snap.wmv</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not perfect, but the period from the middle finger leaving the thumb to smacking the pad is something in the range of 12 and 20 frames (starts at about frame -10 and ends somewhere between frame 2 and frame 10).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s 12-20 frames over a distance of, say, 5 cm. That works out to 6 &#8211; 10 ms over 5 cm, which works out to between 5 and 8 m/sec.</p>
<p>As a ballpark guess, I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s not too shabby. The speed of the finger likely peaks a fair bit faster than that. Somebody grab a high speed camera and a ruler!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinkyhead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/#comment-16426</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinkyhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7989#comment-16426</guid>
		<description>Nature is conservative, so if fast enough is fast enough then fast enough will do. A secondary consideration would be stealth for these shrimp, so it may be that the stealth of slow stabbing vs &#039;loud&#039; punching reinforces its being slower as well. A lot of subtle pressures in evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nature is conservative, so if fast enough is fast enough then fast enough will do. A secondary consideration would be stealth for these shrimp, so it may be that the stealth of slow stabbing vs &#8216;loud&#8217; punching reinforces its being slower as well. A lot of subtle pressures in evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MosesZD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/#comment-16425</link>
		<dc:creator>MosesZD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7989#comment-16425</guid>
		<description>F=MV   + leverage.    Nature understands these and doesn&#039;t tell itself stories about big, manly  muscles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F=MV   + leverage.    Nature understands these and doesn&#8217;t tell itself stories about big, manly  muscles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/#comment-16424</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7989#comment-16424</guid>
		<description>Fascinating article, and a fascinating and beautiful group of animals. I have seen them myself many times while diving in Southeast Asia.
One thing i noticed: in the last para, there seems to be an &quot;s&quot; where there should be a &quot;t&quot;: &quot;extreme punches so generate extreme accelerations&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating article, and a fascinating and beautiful group of animals. I have seen them myself many times while diving in Southeast Asia.<br />
One thing i noticed: in the last para, there seems to be an &#8220;s&#8221; where there should be a &#8220;t&#8221;: &#8220;extreme punches so generate extreme accelerations&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/21/why-are-stabby-mantis-shrimps-so-much-slower-than-punchy-ones/#comment-16423</link>
		<dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/?p=7989#comment-16423</guid>
		<description>Maybe the stabby-shrimp&#039;s prey wear Holtzman generators as personal shields? Fast-moving blades won&#039;t penetrate, but a slower, more practiced attack will gain entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the stabby-shrimp&#8217;s prey wear Holtzman generators as personal shields? Fast-moving blades won&#8217;t penetrate, but a slower, more practiced attack will gain entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
