Space Junk is a Problem. Is a Laser Cannon the Solution?

By Corey S. Powell | May 20, 2015 4:14 pm

Rocket_body_explosions

There’s a general rule in media reporting called Betteridge’s Law: Whenever a headline poses a question–especially a sensational one–the answer is “no.” I’m going to break the law this time. An orbiting laser cannon is not only an intriguing technology but, yes, it’s one of the most promising ways to clean up the ever-thickening cloud of dangerous debris surrounding the Earth.

And just to be clear, space junk is a danger. There are about 25,000 human-made objects larger than your fist flying around in orbit, and about half a million pieces bigger than a dime. If you include millimeter-scale shrapnel, the number of rogue bits reaches deep into the millions. Typical speeds in low-Earth orbit are about 30,000 kilometers per hour (18,000 miles per hour), ten times the velocity of a rifle bullet. You see the problem: A little impact can pack a big wallop.

So far, there have not been any space-junk catastrophes remotely resembling the sensationalized events in the movie Gravity, but the reality is still disconcerting. In 2009, a $50 million Iridium communications satellite was destroyed by a collision with a defunct Russian satellite. Three years later, the Fermi space observatory had a near miss with another Soviet-era satellite. NASA had to clad the International Space Station in shielding to protect it from repeated small impacts, and the agency sometimes moves the whole station to dodge larger pieces of junk. Orbiting debris adds cost and risk to the space business.

The proposed space-station laser cannon (left) would work in conjunction with a telescope called EUSO to track and destroy space debris. (Credit: RIKEN)

The proposed space-station laser cannon (upper left) would work in conjunction with a telescope called EUSO to track and destroy space debris. (Credit: RIKEN)

The amount of junk in orbit is increasing rapidly, meaning that those costs and risks are increasing, too. Once junk gets up there, it takes a long time to come back down: years to centuries in low orbits, and essentially forever in geosynchronous orbit (40,000 kilometers up, where many communications satellites are located). Most disconcerting, collisions in orbit create more junk, which leads to more collisions. Potentially this could lead to a runaway process called Kessler Syndrome.

This is where the laser cannon comes in. Toshikazu Ebisuzaki and a team of researchers at the RIKEN lab in Japan have formulated a plan to clear out near-Earth space by zapping pieces of space junk with a high-power blast of focused radiation. The laser doesn’t need to be able to destroy the whole piece of debris. All it has to do is vaporize enough of the object to slow its orbit and send it spiraling into Earth’s atmosphere, where it will burn up harmlessly before reaching the ground. It’s an ingenious solution.

Ebisuzaki’s concept was inspired by a science project called the Extreme Universe Space Observatory, currently under development for the International Space Station. EUSO, which will be installed on the station in 2017, is a fascinating instrument in its own right; it will study extremely high-cosmic rays by watching the light they create when they collide with air molecules. But EUSO’s sensitive, wide-field optics also make it well suited to spotting and tracking small bits of space debris, which are hard to locate from the ground. Finding targets is the crucial first step toward getting rid of them.

The next step, of course, is the laser. RIKEN’s concept (which is not yet funded) would start with a 10-watt laser prototype, mounted on the International Space Station, capable of firing 100 laser pulses a second. That would pave the way for a larger system powerful enough to blast away any pieces of space junk within a 100-kilometer range, and eventually lead to a dedicated garbage-cleanup satellite equipped with a 500,000-watt laser that can fire 50,000 times per second. Such a satellite could remove 100,000 pieces of junk a year, the Japanese researchers claim, fast enough to bring the whole orbital debris problem under control.

The fast-growing population of space debris. "LEO" refers to low-Earth orbit. (Credit: Surrey Space Centre)

The fast-growing population of space debris. “LEO” refers to low-Earth orbit. (Credit: Surrey Space Centre)

There are significant technical hurdles to overcome, including the data-processing capacity needed to spot the bits of debris and the considerable energy supply needed to keep such a powerful laser operating for years. Building a giant laser-cannon satellite would not be cheap, either. But this is exactly the kind of ambitious thinking needed to tackle the space-junk mess.

Several additional cleanup technologies are also under development. A separate Japanese-led team has proposed trapping and eliminating space debris with a huge electromagnetic tether. A European project called e.DeOrbit would snare big pieces of space junk using a net or harpoon and dispatch them Earthward. Other concepts under study would use puffs of pressurized gas, large magnetized nets, or a slingshot-style satellite. The laser cannon has some obvious advantages over all of these options, however. It could tackle the small fry, not just the big pieces, and it could deal with far more targets than would be possible for any spacecraft that is going after them one by one.

If all of these ideas sound a little wacky, there’s a good reason: Getting rid of space junk is a really, really hard problem. There is a lot of space to scour for debris. The individual pieces are mostly small and nearly invisible, and they each follow a unique orbit. Hard problems call for creative (and sometimes wacky) solutions. Further complicating things, nobody has devoted much money to cleanup, and any mission that can remove space junk could potentially remove active satellites as well–a delicate political issue. If the RIKEN laser cannon never happens, it will more likely be due to budget and political obstacles than to technical ones.

In the long run, the best way to deal with space junk is never to create it in the first place. One of the most important principles here is what is called design for demise–that is, engineering satellites so that they will automatically de-orbit and remove themselves from the trash pile within, say, 25 years of the end of their mission. A simple way to do this is to equip a satellite with a small sail that would pop open when it is no longer needed. The so-called gossamer sail would act like a space parachute, using the pressure of sunlight and the extremely thin traces of atmosphere in orbit to create drag. The drag would then pull the satellite down to a fiery demise.

Simulated view of Earth from the Planetary Society's new LightSail. Space sails could be used to clear away satellite debris--or to take humanity on great new ventures of exploration. (Credit: Josh Spradling/Planetary Society)

Simulated view of Earth from the Planetary Society’s new LightSail, launched on May 20. Space sails could be used to clear away satellite debris–or to take humanity on great ventures of exploration. (Credit: Josh Spradling/Planetary Society)

A gossamer sail is very similar in function to a solar sail–like the prototype LightSail launched today by the Planetary Society. That creates a neat kind of symmetry to the story. Powerful space lasers may be useful for clearing debris, but they could also be used to launch high-speed spacecraft. Solar sails could be used to de-orbit satellites, but they could also provide new ways to navigate to new worlds.

In short, the kinds of technological solutions needed to clear a path through our local garbage dump could be the exact same ones needed to blaze a path to the stars.

Follow me on Twitter: @coreyspowell

ADVERTISEMENT
  • jo Beerlover

    Wouldn’t the space junk have to be orbiting in a direction exactly toward the cannon for it to decelerate the object to burn up in the atmosphere? At a 90 degree angle all that would change is the object’s angle of orbit, and at higher offset you would actually increase the orbital speed rather than slow it down.

    I honestly don’t think a single laser cannon on a single craft would clean much debris from orbit. The debris would have to have a very specific orbit relative to the ISS to actually work.

    • coreyspowell

      You are correct that the ISS version of the system would have limited capability. A large-scale cleanup of space debris would require a dedicated satellite (or satellites) in an 800-km polar orbit, according to the RIKEN team.

      The full paper is behind a paywall, but you can read the abstract here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576515000867

  • icabod

    In 2007 China conducted a antisattilite test. I created a debris field of over 150,000 pat ovals of which more the 2,000 were traceable. In space, even a paint chip can cause damage. In fact one of the space shuttles windows was cratered by such a piece.
    Will this “cannon” just create more, and smaller debris?

  • Nobbing

    < col Hiiiiiii Friends….< ++essence++ see MORE DETAIL

    ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

  • Aliya Khan

    nice informative blog

  • dona_trump

    a very interesting read
    pressure washing

  • Robert Whitney

    If you need 18,000 mph to stay in orbit, then isn’t everything going in the same direction ? What you need is a huge Kevlar sail, then, when the debris field is targeted, have it slow down a little bit so as to scoop up those little buggers and then change orbit and send them on their way to the sun. Pretty stupid huh?

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Out There

Notes from the far edge of space, astronomy, and physics.

About Corey S. Powell

Corey S. Powell is DISCOVER's Editor at Large and former Editor in Chief. Previously he has sat on the board of editors of Scientific American, taught science journalism at NYU, and been fired from NASA. Corey is the author of "20 Ways the World Could End," one of the first doomsday manuals, and "God in the Equation," an examination of the spiritual impulse in modern cosmology. He lives in Brooklyn, under nearly starless skies.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+