<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll Shows Voters Like Science (in Theory, Anyway)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/02/new-poll-shows-voters-like-science-in-theory-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/02/new-poll-shows-voters-like-science-in-theory-anyway/</link>
	<description>A blog about science, politics, and how to let each help the other without compromising them both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:04:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/02/new-poll-shows-voters-like-science-in-theory-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/02/new-poll-shows-voters-like-science-in-theory-anyway/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I took a look at the poll you referred to and the interpretation by the scientists involved. Unfortunately, I think you must have read it too quickly or missed the point. The poll itself asked voters how likely they would be to support candidates who support science ie vote for them. So, it was not an interpretation of the results, it WAS the result. I share your skepticism on polls, but think you have to get the facts straight when criticizing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at the poll you referred to and the interpretation by the scientists involved. Unfortunately, I think you must have read it too quickly or missed the point. The poll itself asked voters how likely they would be to support candidates who support science ie vote for them. So, it was not an interpretation of the results, it WAS the result. I share your skepticism on polls, but think you have to get the facts straight when criticizing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
