<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would Einstein Do? Part XVII: Walter Bender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/</link>
	<description>A blog about science, politics, and how to let each help the other without compromising them both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:18:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>Mkae scientists stop saying anything publishing anything based on nothing for grant money and go to work for a change</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mkae scientists stop saying anything publishing anything based on nothing for grant money and go to work for a change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe nahhas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>joe nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/10/09/what-would-einstein-do-part-xvii-walter-bender/#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>E=mc²/2
2009 is the end of Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc² 
Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com 
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein&#039;s space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When &quot;results&quot; expected and &quot;No&quot; discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud! 
r ------------------&gt;&gt;Exp (ì w t) ----------&gt;&gt; S=r Exp (ì wt)   Nahhas&#039; Equation
Orbit--------&gt;&gt; Orbit light sensing------&gt;&gt; Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
Particle ----&gt;&gt; light sensing of moving objects------------ &gt;&gt; Wave
Newton---------&gt;&gt;light sensing----------&gt;&gt; Quantum
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
Quantum - Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions 
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c 
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
   = (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr 
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
      = m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
     = mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
      =ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed 
wt = π/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 - 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit)   If v = c
w t = π/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 - ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [l n (1/2)] = [-ỉ (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c  
Conclusion:  E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2                                           joenahhas1958@yahoo.com.         All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m&#039; r) ² = (1/2m) (m&#039; r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m&#039; r =mc
E=mc²/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E=mc²/2<br />
2009 is the end of Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc²<br />
<a href="mailto:Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a><br />
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein&#8217;s space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When &#8220;results&#8221; expected and &#8220;No&#8221; discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud!<br />
r &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;>>Exp (ì w t) &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;->> S=r Exp (ì wt)   Nahhas&#8217; Equation<br />
Orbit&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;>> Orbit light sensing&#8212;&#8212;>> Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential<br />
Particle &#8212;->> light sensing of moving objects&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; >> Wave<br />
Newton&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;>>light sensing&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;->> Quantum<br />
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects<br />
Quantum &#8211; Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions<br />
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c<br />
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time<br />
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects<br />
P = visual velocity = change of visual location<br />
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)<br />
   = (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr<br />
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2<br />
      = m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)<br />
     = mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]<br />
      =ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed<br />
wt = π/2<br />
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 &#8211; 2 + 0)<br />
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit)   If v = c<br />
w t = π/4<br />
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c<br />
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 &#8211; ln2<br />
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [l n (1/2)] = [-ỉ (1/2)]<br />
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c<br />
Conclusion:  E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2                                           <a href="mailto:joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a>.         All rights reserved.<br />
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then<br />
E=1/2m (m v + m&#8217; r) ² = (1/2m) (m&#8217; r) ²; v = 0<br />
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m&#8217; r =mc<br />
E=mc²/2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
