<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Base &#187; Reality Checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/category/reality-checks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase</link>
	<description>A blog about science, politics, and how to let each help the other without compromising them both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Science in the Courtroom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-in-the-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-in-the-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science in the Courtroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-in-the-courtroom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forensic Science
DNA evidence, fingerprint analysis, toxicology, and other &#8220;hard evidence&#8221; sources have gotten so popular—and so advanced—that juries (and lawyers) are bending to the so-called &#8220;CSI Effect&#8220;—despite the longterm frequency of sample contamination and lab errors.
Not that we&#8217;re putting down forensic evidence—for all its faults, it has worked courtroom miracles across the globe.
Surveillance
After taking full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/science-in-the-courtroom.JPG" alt="courtroom" align="left" /><strong>Forensic Science</strong><br />
DNA evidence, fingerprint analysis, toxicology, and other &#8220;hard evidence&#8221; sources have gotten so popular—and <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/aug/fingerprint-technique-shows-what-youve-eaten/">so advanced</a>—that juries (and lawyers) are bending to the so-called &#8220;<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/05/07/070507fa_fact_toobin">CSI Effect</a>&#8220;—despite the longterm frequency of <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/183018_crimelabboxesweb22.html">sample contamination</a> and <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/jul/reasonable-doubt/">lab errors</a>.</p>
<p>Not that we&#8217;re putting down forensic evidence—for all its faults, it has <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/010308dnmetexonerate.35a56b6.html">worked</a> courtroom miracles <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/nov/the-freeing-of/article_view?b_start:int=0&amp;-C=">across the globe</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Surveillance</strong><br />
After <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/12/fbi-recorded-27.html#previouspost">taking full advantage</a> of the post-Patriot Act world, the FBI may finally be getting a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/secret-spy-cour.html">legal</a>—and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/washington/10fisa.html">Congressional</a>—smackdown for its cavalier attitude towards people&#8217;s desire not to be spied on.</p>
<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>
<p><strong>Science as a Defense</strong><br />
Big Tobacco&#8217;s <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9405E2DE123CF931A15751C1A96E958260&amp;scp=3&amp;sq=tobacco+%24206+billion+settlement&amp;st=nyt">massive hit</a>—a class action settlement to the tune of $206 billion—struck a nerve with other industries, at least one of which is <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/06/16/gambling_science/">already whipping up some &#8220;solid&#8221; science</a> to help mount a defense when/should the class actions commence. If it works, look for plenty more privately funded research labs in the near future.</p>
<p><strong>Drug Lawsuits</strong><br />
From <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--drugcompanylawsui0529may29,0,2214616.story">price</a> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/06/10/ap5100754.html">inflation</a> to <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/21/ap5035691.html">deceptive advertising</a> to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/be4b11c9d1e3169aac447f1d99c72732.htm">injury class actions</a>, drugmakers are spending plenty of time—and money—in the courts these days. And as more Big Pharma companies <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/06/11/ap5105129.html">see their patents expire</a> and the generic brands swoop in, look for drug companies to start filing suit against each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-in-the-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Health Care</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-health-care/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HIV/AIDS
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has changed the face of HIV, limiting new infections and allowing the infected to live a somewhat &#8220;normal&#8221; life. But while the spread is slowing,  AIDS deaths are far from over, both at home and abroad. Sub-Saharan Africa, not to mention China, Russia, and Indonesia, continue to see higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/health-care.JPG" alt="healthcare" align="left" /><strong>HIV/AIDS</strong><br />
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiretroviral_drug">HAART</a>) has <a href="http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/E1F730E7-EC4F-49AF-A07E-8AD47AB9974B.asp">changed the face of HIV</a>, limiting new infections and allowing the infected to live a somewhat &#8220;normal&#8221; life. But while the spread <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6751651.stm">is slowing</a>,  AIDS deaths are far from over, both <a href="http://nymag.com/health/bestdoctors/2008/47569/">at home</a> and <a href="http://www.healthnews.com/medical-updates/the-battle-against-aids-continues-with-mixed-results-1214.html">abroad</a>. Sub-Saharan Africa, not to mention China, Russia, and Indonesia, continue to see <a href="http://www.healthnews.com/medical-updates/the-battle-against-aids-continues-with-mixed-results-1214.html">higher infection rates,</a> and treatment is only reaching <a href="http://www.natap.org/2007/IAS/IAS_03.htm">about 30 percent</a> of those who need it. And, of course, there&#8217;s the matter of the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4143943.ece">two &#8220;separate&#8221; epidemics</a>, and the taboos that come with acknowledging—and treating—them.</p>
<p><strong>The Pharmaceutical Industry</strong><br />
As the race for new drugs grows ever tighter, Big Pharma companies  have begun <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2008/tc20080610_071365.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_science">outsourcing R&amp;D</a> to China and India, while creeping ever <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/sciences-worst-enemy-private-funding/article_view?searchterm=drug%20industry&amp;b_start:int=1">closer to the &#8220;scientific research/private interests&#8221; divide</a>. Meanwhile, activist groups are calling for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/health/17glob.html">greater social responsibility</a> in the industry—and the the American Medical Students Association is <a href="http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=11648&amp;articleId=107362">calling for more policies</a> on financial conflicts of interest—<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/06/09/harvard-psychiatrists-under-fire-for-drug-company-funding/">with good reason</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The Doctor Shortage</strong><br />
Conflicts of interest or no, we&#8217;re in for a <a href="http://www.gazette.com/articles/care_37332___article.html/likely_physicians.html">serious shortage of doctors</a> in the near future—bad news as the baby boomers hit their golden years. As for the doctors currently practicing, many of them are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/health/views/17essa.html?em&amp;ex=1213934400&amp;en=f8ba07f9bf7002d3&amp;ei=5087%0A">pretty unhappy</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-28"></span></p>
<p><strong>Autism</strong><br />
While it may be <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/apr/autism-it2019s-not-just-in-the-head/article_view?searchterm=autism&amp;b_start:int=0">more than just a brain disorder</a> and <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/sep/father-older-autism/?searchterm=autism">may be linked to older dads</a>, the number of <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79371">diagnosed cases is on the rise</a>—though whether that&#8217;s due to an increase in actual numbers or <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1170424.stm">merely better diagnoses</a> remains to be seen. One thing we&#8217;ve known for a while: <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2003/feb/breakautism/?searchterm=autism">It ain&#8217;t the vaccines</a>, despite the fluke results of <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/20/2089">the Hannah Poling case</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Universal Health Care? </strong><br />
On the election front, Obama&#8217;s proposed health care plan involves <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/2007/05/29/obama_offers_universal_health.php">creation of a public insurance program</a>, with a $2,500 premium for middle class families, sliding-scale subsidies for low-income participants, and a prohibition on insurance companies turning people down for preexisting conditions.</p>
<p>McCain, meanwhile, wants to <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/03/mccain_camp_working_out_healthcare_details/">end tax breaks for employers</a>—a particularly painful move given that employer health care costs are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080617/ap_on_bi_ge/healthcare_costs;_ylt=AoSVnv0a.pHxP0a.6XzeYOCs0NUE">expected to rise nearly 10 percent in 2008</a>—and stick in a tax credit to help people pay their health insurance bills—the larger goal being to <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/03/mccain_camp_working_out_healthcare_details/">shrink government involvement</a> and avoid regulating insurance companies (though he would promote cost controls).</p>
<p>Whichever way the election goes, the winner would be wise to keep an eye on the benefits—and costs—of  Massachusetts&#8217;s current <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/03/AR2008060303198.html">universal health insurance program</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Science &amp; Religion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-religion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolution
The intelligent design/creationism battle continues, with outspoken scientists tackling their opponents head-on. Influentials in the Catholic Church, meanwhile, have been discussing whether evolution was governed by randomness or God&#8217;s intention.
But the people—the American ones, at least—are still fond of their God-created species. Then again, maybe people&#8217;s stance on evolution depends on the way you ask [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/science-religion.JPG" alt="religion" align="left" /><strong>Evolution</strong><br />
The intelligent design/creationism battle continues, with outspoken scientists <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/">tackling their opponents head-on</a>. Influentials in the Catholic Church, meanwhile, have been <a href="http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/catholic/schonborn-NYTimes.html">discussing</a> whether evolution was governed by randomness or God&#8217;s intention.</p>
<p>But the people—the American ones, at least—are <a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=581">still</a> <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2008/05/at_least_12_of_us_biology_teac.html">fond</a> of their God-created species. Then again, maybe people&#8217;s stance on evolution depends on <a href="http://www.livescience.com/history/080102-evolution-teaching.html">the way you ask the questions</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Science Finds God</strong><br />
Lest ye think that science and religion can never co-exist, some <a href="http://www.templeton.org/belief/hitchens_miller.html#pinker">evolution-supporting scientists</a> are <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Finding-Darwins-God-Scientists-Evolution/dp/0060930497">totally into God</a>. Others have even gone so far as to <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/dec/god-experiments/">use one</a> (science) to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Spell-Religion-Natural-Phenomenon/dp/067003472X">figure out</a> the other (religion).</p>
<p><span id="more-27"></span></p>
<p>But regardless of where you come down on the question, the Vatican wants you to know that if we ever find alien life, &#8220;<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90KSE100&amp;show_article=1">the extraterrestrial is [our] brother</a>&#8220;—offering a new dimension to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087004/"><em>The Brother From Another Planet</em></a>.</p>
<p><strong>In the Courts</strong><br />
Intelligent design in schools may have died its legal, if not popular, death in <a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/12/waterloo_in_dov.html">Kitzmiller v. The Dover Area School District</a>. But creationists have decided to rebrand: Now they&#8217;re advocating teaching about the &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/us/04evolution.html">strengths and weaknesses</a>&#8221; of evolution. Hopefully this new rephrasing will also get bounced out of a federal court within the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/18/reality-check-science-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Climate Change</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/17/reality-check-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/17/reality-check-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/17/reality-check-climate-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Warming
First question: Is it real? Yes, it is. While the deniers have been going strong for years, leading to forehead-slapping patterns of government inaction, it looks like even anti-global warming proponents may finally be coming around. And not a moment too soon, given that those glaciers are still melting, the oceans are still rising, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/climate-change3.jpg" alt="climate" align="left" /><strong>Global Warming</strong><br />
First question: Is it real? <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/science/earth/03climate.html">Yes</a>, <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf">it</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/17/science/earth/17climate.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">is</a>. While the deniers have been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/opinion/04wed2.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">going strong</a> for years, leading to forehead-slapping patterns of <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/366115_warmed.html">government inaction</a>, it looks like even anti-global warming proponents may <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/05/29/whither-the-valdez-exxonmobil-cuts-cash-for-global-warming-deniers/">finally be coming around</a>. And not a moment too soon, given that those glaciers are <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/04/24/eaarctic124.xml">still melting</a>, the oceans are <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/03/24/MNG22HTITV1.DTL">still rising</a>, and the land is <a href="http://www.livescience.com/environment/080610-icemelt-permafrost.html">still warming</a>.</p>
<p>Next question: What are we going to do about it? Thus far, Europe has been <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/09/carbonemissions.climatechange">looking to the cap-and-trade</a> system, which <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/08/AR2007040800758_pf.html">hasn&#8217;t been without</a> its bumps. <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2218557/despite-senate-defeat-cap-trade">Despite the troubles it&#8217;s had in the U.S.</a> so far, chances are it&#8217;ll be adopted here at some point after November.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the idea of sequestering all that carbon, an option that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN1036251020080610">states like New York</a>—as well as <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13918824.500-the-high-cost-of-carbon-dioxide-great-balls-of-ice-or-a-seafloor-coated-with-snow--just-two-of-the-imaginative-schemes-being-dreamt-upto-deal-with-one-of-the-planets-most-potent-greenho">the Big Oil companies</a>—have embraced.</p>
<p>Plus there&#8217;s no forgetting methane, the greenhouse gas <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060829-methane-warming.html">20 times more potent</a> than carbon dioxide. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/mid_/6288012.stm">Efforts to dampen</a> the most egregious methane emitters have focused on its biggest source: <a href="http://www.mycattle.com/health/dsp_health_article.cfm?storyid=10045">livestock burps</a>. Luckily, there&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2007/12/19/kangaroo-ifying-cows-to-fight-global-warming/">research</a> in the <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080506120859.htm">works</a> to, er, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6431-burp-vaccine-cuts-greenhouse-gas-emissions.html">rectify</a> the problem.</p>
<p><span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p>And, of course, there&#8217;s always the notion of using less carbon in the first place. Social awareness of carbon footprints is at an all-time high, and everyone from <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=2049304&amp;page=1">regular Joes</a> to <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/may/21-how-big-is-discover.s-carbon-footprint">magazines</a> is working to decrease their carbon trail. Alternative energy could play a major part in our efforts—for more on this, see <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-energy/">Reality Check: Energy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/17/reality-check-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Food and Obesity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/13/reality-check-food-and-obesity/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/13/reality-check-food-and-obesity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition & Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/13/reality-check-food-and-obesity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obesity
The good news: Child obesity rates in the U.S. have finally stopped rising. The bad news: Even if the rates have stabilized for good, experts say levels are already so high that the epidemic will continue for decades. More bad news: Obesity increases the risk of everything from stillbirth to heart disease. And more bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/nutrition-obesity.JPG" alt="Nutrition" align="left" /><strong>Obesity</strong><br />
The good news: Child obesity rates in the U.S. have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/27/AR2008052701989.html">finally stopped rising</a>. The bad news: Even if the rates have stabilized for good, experts say levels are already so high that the epidemic will continue for decades. More bad news: Obesity increases the risk of everything from <a href="http://www.nursinginpractice.com/default.asp?title=Obesityincreasesstillbirthrisk&amp;page=article.display&amp;article.id=11444">stillbirth</a> to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/12/AR2008051201783.html">heart disease</a>. And more bad news: Rimonabant, once hailed as an anti-obesity wonder drug,  has now been <a href="http://www.theheart.org/article/872263.do">associated with multiple deaths</a> in the U.K. Still, on the upside, all those cases of bariatric surgery <a href="http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20041012/weight-loss-surgery-can-cure-diabetes">may be curing diabetes</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p><strong>The Food Crisis</strong><br />
On the other end of the spectrum, the global food crisis is threatening to leave more than 1 billion hungry, and causing turmoil from <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2008/06/05/food-crisis-adds-to-pakistan-afghanistan-tensions/">Pakistan</a> to <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-06-05-voa44.cfm">American grocery stores</a>. A <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-06/06/content_8318302.htm">U.N. summit of world leaders</a> has pledged to push down food prices, boost agriculture, and ease trade restrictions as a common response—though not without <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2008/06/05/amid_calls_for_unity_politics_divide_un_food_conference/">considerable politicking</a> first. Muddying the water even more is the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7435439.stm">rise of biofuels</a>, meaning less crops for food and more for your greedy car.</p>
<p><strong>Food Legislation</strong><br />
The $307 billion <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/washington/15cnd-farm.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">farm bill passed this year by Congress</a> extended just about every federal food subsidy on the books, leading to <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/6/4/43736/55179/">criticism</a> that it didn&#8217;t do enough to encourage farmers to move towards more natural and healthier growing. Still, the bill&#8217;s local food initiative, community food projects, and organic agriculture funding did <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/6/3/20415/38118/">leave some happy</a>—though &#8220;organic&#8221; can still <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1599110,00.html">be a somewhat &#8220;flexible&#8221; moniker</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/13/reality-check-food-and-obesity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Science in Wartime</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/10/reality-check-science-in-wartime/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/10/reality-check-science-in-wartime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science in Wartime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/10/reality-check-science-in-wartime/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrorism
The threat of terrorism is a fixture in the public consciousness, and scientists are doing everything from scouring the Internet to concocting vaccines to come up with ways of thwarting the next attack. Still, all the attention—and funding—given to preventing bioterrorism or dirty bombs may be based on assumptions that are at best overblown, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/science-in-wartime2.jpg" alt="wartime" align="left" /><strong>Terrorism</strong><br />
The threat of terrorism is a fixture in the public consciousness, and scientists are doing everything from <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/jul/cover">scouring the Internet</a> to <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/may/next-story1">concocting vaccines</a> to come up with ways of thwarting the next attack. Still, all the attention—and funding—given to preventing bioterrorism or dirty bombs may be <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/sep/homeland-insecurity/?searchterm=bioterrorism">based on assumptions that are at best overblown</a>, and at worst flat out inane.</p>
<p><strong>Nuclear Weapons</strong><br />
The number of nukes in the world—as well as the number of countries that have them—<a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/sep/atomicagain">isn&#8217;t dropping any time soon</a>, leaving scientists <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/may/return-of-nuclear-winter">worried about the environmental fallout</a> should one or more of them ever be used.</p>
<p><strong>Military Technology</strong><br />
Can robots commit war crimes? It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2008/02/military-turing-test-would-make-war.html">worth discussing</a>, as <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-12/robots-go-war">robotic weapons</a> technology continues to reach new levels of sophistication. Meanwhile, <a href="http://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/swager-sensing.html">weapons advancements</a> are emerging from labs as fast as <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/the-most-important-future-military-technologies/?searchterm=weapon">scientists can generate them</a>—with inspiration sometimes <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/may/the-air-force-goes-batty">coming from the unlikeliest of places</a>. Innovation hasn&#8217;t been restricted to deadly weapons—the non-lethal side has seen development of ideas from <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2007/feb/jetpack-future-technologies/article_view?b_start:int=1&amp;-C">heat beams</a> to <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/go/4815/">laser guns</a> to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/owwwww!/video-of-xrep-wireless-taser-shotgun-shocking-some-dude-276481.php">taser shotguns</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-23"></span></p>
<p><strong>Medical Advances </strong><br />
Estimates on the number of American soldiers sustaining both physical and mental injuries in Iraq have <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/">officially passed 30,000</a> (and unofficially reached 100,000), and researchers have been developing <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/19/080519fa_fact_halpern">ever-more creative ways</a> of <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/05/26/regrowing.body.parts/?iref=mpstoryview">treating their wounds</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/10/reality-check-science-in-wartime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Science and the Election</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-science-and-the-election/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-science-and-the-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Goes to Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 2008 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-science-and-the-election/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolution
At last, the presidential race is narrowed to two. But before the field was narrowed, three of the Republican presidential candidates openly stated that they didn’t believe in evolution, while the GOP nominee has supported teaching intelligent design in schools—which may be a foregone conclusion, given that between 12 and 16 percent of high school [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/the-2008-election2.jpg" alt="election" align="left" /><strong>Evolution</strong><br />
At last, the presidential race is narrowed to two. But before the field was narrowed, three of the Republican presidential candidates openly <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/05/you_say_you_wan.html">stated that they didn’t believe in evolution</a>, while the GOP nominee has <a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069">supported teaching intelligent design</a> in schools—which may be a foregone conclusion, given that between 12 and 16 percent of high school biology teachers currently <a href="http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124&amp;ct=1&amp;SESSID=8790a574484013d08a0219f2855e268b">consider themselves creationists</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Stem Cell Research</strong><br />
The current President&#8217;s position on funding for stem cell research <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3297142&amp;page=1">hasn&#8217;t exactly been friendly</a>. But hope glints on the horizon: Obama has <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_9175169">vowed to overturn Bush&#8217;s restrictions</a>, and even McCain has announced he will support federal funding—<a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/apr/03-in-election-year-stem-cell-question-grows-still-gnarlier">though with strings attached</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Biofuels</strong><br />
Iowa&#8217;s role in the presidential caucuses <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071216/BUSINESS01/712160303/-1/biofuels">gave ethanol a boost</a>, and McCain has stated that he <a href="http://www.alternativeenergyhq.com/alternative-energy/john-mccain-energy-policy-for-2008-election">&#8220;see[s] a bright future for ethanol&#8221;</a>—though he&#8217;s admittedly &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121296676181055711.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">wary</a>&#8221; of government subsidies for the fuel, and his support has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/05/gop.ethanol/">appeared to wane</a> in the wake of rising food prices. Obama, meanwhile, has pledged to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2231243820080604?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10112">boost the renewable fuel standard to at least 60 billion gallons</a> by 2030 and require that all new vehicles be &#8220;flexfuel&#8221; by 2012.</p>
<p><span id="more-22"></span></p>
<p><strong>Emissions</strong><br />
While McCain is sticking by his 2007 bill to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2231243820080604?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10112">cut emissions 30 percent by 2050</a>, Obama takes it up a notch, calling for an 80 percent slash of emissions below 1990 levels by 2050.</p>
<p><strong>Alaskan Drilling</strong><br />
For once, they&#8217;re all agreed: Both <a href="http://www.anwr.org/archives/presidential_candidates_views_on_anwr_a_the_democrats.php">Obama</a> and <a href="http://www.anwr.org/archives/presidential_candidates_views_on_anwr_a_the_republicans.php">McCain</a> are in support of leaving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-science-and-the-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Energy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-energy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels
Despite all the furor over alternative energy sources, fossil fuels continue to power our lives. Yes, oil is starting to dwindle in supply, but we could always drill for the stuff in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge … and save ourselves a buck per barrel 20 years from now. And global reserves of coal—recently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/energy.JPG" alt="Energy" align="left" /><strong>Fossil Fuels</strong><br />
Despite all the furor over alternative energy sources, fossil fuels continue to power our lives. Yes, oil is <a href="http://africa.reuters.com/business/news/usnBAN840667.html">starting to dwindle in supply</a>, but we could always drill for the stuff in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge … and <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2008/05/23/arctic-drilling-wouldnt-cool-high-oil-prices.html">save ourselves a buck per barrel</a> 20 years from now. And global reserves of coal—recently thought to be enough to last for centuries at current levels of production—might<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/05/fossilfuels.energy"> actually be significantly lower</a>: &#8220;peak coal&#8221; could apparently sneak up on us pretty fast.</p>
<p>Luckily, scientists have been hard at work searching for ways to mitigate the global warming impact of fossil fuels, such as <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/dec/clean-coal-technology/">carbon dioxide storing technology</a> at coal plants—though you <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/business/30coal.html?_r=2&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">may not want to hold your breath</a> for the &#8220;clean coal&#8221; movement.</p>
<p><strong>Biofuels</strong><br />
Instead of using petroleum, which is imported, pollution-causing, and slowly disappearing, why not simply power your car with plants of all <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/15-10/ff_plant?currentPage=all">shapes</a> and <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/environment/archives/139985.asp">sizes</a>? But when something sounds too good to be true, it often is, and our favorite new fuel alternative may wind up being a <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/20/healthscience/biofuels.php">damaging</a> and <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/may/03-biofuel-farming-looks-to-be-an-environmental-disaster/">waste-producing dud</a>—and one that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/26/biofuels.energy">winning us no friends in the international arena</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>Meanwhile, researchers soldier on with effort to <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/business/your-money/2008/01/11/cellulosic-ethanol.html">produce fuel from cellulosic plants</a>—which sounds great in theory, but <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/3/125745/7746">hasn&#8217;t been so great in practice</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Solar, Wind, and Geothermal</strong><br />
This oft-forgotten trio has <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/apr/03-the-great-forgotten-clean-energy-source/">shown</a> lots of <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14319342.100-can-we-learn-to-love-the-wind-wind-power-was-the-epitomeof-all-that-was-clean-and-green--until-the-realities-began-to-set-injeremy-webb-investigates-whether-wind-farms-are-just-the-n">promise</a>, and now a few large-scale realizations are finally underway,  such as the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2007-04-17-air-force-solar-power_N.htm">U.S. Air Force base</a> in Nevada powered entirely with solar panels.</p>
<p>As for cost, while solar power remains more expensive than regular electricity, experts are <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Shrinking-the-cost-for-solar-power/2100-11392_3-6182947.html">looking for a solution</a> that would up its economic viability. Wind, meanwhile, is <a href="http://watthead.blogspot.com/2008/03/innovative-low-cost-windbelt-could.html">getting increasingly competitive</a>. And for those looking toward an innovative future, keep an eye out for <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/05/30/space.solar/?iref=intlOnlyonCNN">solar power gathered in space</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Nuclear Power</strong><br />
Yes, it has an <a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html">image problem</a>. But is it <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/may/02-is-nuclear-energy-our-best-hope/">really warranted</a>? Given its <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/28/technology/Case_for_nukes_Spiers.fortune/?postversion=2008052913">efficiency and relative  environmental purity</a>, maybe it’s time to turn back to the green glowing standby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/09/reality-check-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Biotech</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/02/reality-check-the-state-of-biotech/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/02/reality-check-the-state-of-biotech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/02/reality-check-the-state-of-biotech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stem Cells
The last three decades have been quite a ride in the world of stem cells. Since they were first isolated in mice in 1981, they&#8217;ve rocked the global scientific community with their potential healing abilities—and also sparked massive political and religious debate.
Scientists have been getting results with microRNAs, which have been used to successfully [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/06/biotech.JPG" alt="biotech" align="left" /><strong>Stem Cells</strong><br />
The last three decades have been quite a ride in the world of stem cells. Since they were first isolated in mice in 1981, they&#8217;ve rocked the global scientific community with their potential healing abilities—and also sparked massive political and religious debate.</p>
<p>Scientists have been <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/05/BU99VE90O.DTL">getting results with microRNAs</a>, which have been used to successfully differentiate stem cells, and have even managed to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jan/14/medicalresearch.sciencenews">re-start dead animal hearts</a> using cell transplantation. Meanwhile, for women, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/health/29stem.html">stem cells in your menstrual blood</a> may come in handy for your health down the road—though exactly how handy remains to be seen.</p>
<p>And while the longterm <a href="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/stemcell/">political and religious furor</a> over stem cells continues to rage on, the <a href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/stemcells/news/2008/01/blastocyst_biopsy">ongoing development</a> of embryonic stem cell-like cells <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16470482">raise scientists&#8217; hopes</a> for miracle cures that would make even the Pope happy.</p>
<p><strong>Bioengineered Meat</strong><br />
Meat is in trouble. Between inhumane farming practices, an increase in livestock-borne diseases, and the problems inherent in generating enough beef, pork, and chicken to feed an ever-growing population, a carnivorous future isn&#8217;t looking rosy. So leave it to scientists to begin developing <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/jan/technology">lab-grown meat</a>, created from cells of living animals. The &#8220;lab meat movement&#8221; has made &#8220;<a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/jul/blinded/article_view?b_start:int=1&amp;-C=">glacial progress</a>&#8221; in the past few years, to the point where PETA has offered a <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/21/peta-offers-1-millio.html">$1 million prize</a> to the first scientist/s who can “produce commercially viable quantities&#8221; of it by 2012. After that, all that&#8217;s left is finding a way to rid consumers of the &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/01/16/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cloned-food/">ick factor</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-20"></span></p>
<p><strong>Cloning</strong><br />
On the human end, cloning and controversy have gone hand in hand. After a scandal involving a <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9904e3df163ff933a25752c0a9609c8b63&amp;sec=health&amp;pagewanted=print">fake cloned human embryo</a> in 2006, the real deal may <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/mg19726403.700-has-human-clone-generated-stem-cells.html">have finally been achieved</a>. But that hasn&#8217;t stopped the widespread <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18205-2005Mar8.html">calls for a ban</a>.</p>
<p>But when it comes to animals, it&#8217;s been the more the merrier since <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/22/newsid_4245000/4245877.stm">Dolly hit the scene</a> in 1997. The FDA has now decreed that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/business/16clone.html">cloned cows are safe to eat</a>, and soon, for the bargain price of around $100,000, you can <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2008/05/the-new-york-ti.html">have your beloved spaniel or retriever cloned as well</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Engineering New Life</strong><br />
Can life be created and manipulated synthetically, and enabled to do things that Mother Nature never could have imagined? Scientists have certainly been game to find out.  From <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/dec/cover/">fabricating a malaria drug</a> by mashing genes from different species into a single microbe to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/science/25genome.html">manufacturing a bacterium&#8217;s complete genome</a> and then <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/science/29cells.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">transferring it to another species</a>, bioengineers have been revolutionizing the field—and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/weekinreview/08wade.html?ex=1185595200&amp;en=fe3c0a61c57929b4&amp;ei=5070">raising some concern</a> as to whether their work could be harnessed for harm as well as good.</p>
<p><strong>The Mind/Machine Connection</strong><br />
Controlling machines with your mind is no longer a sci-fi stunt—recent studies have transformed it into a reality. Researchers at Brown took the first giant leap toward a human-electronics connection, enabling a quadriplegic to <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2006/dec/scientist-of-the-year-2006-runners-up">control a prosthetic hand with only his mind</a>. Their work has now been <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/05/28/monkey-cyborgs-master-mind-control-of-mechanical-arm/">duplicated in an even more sophisticated test</a>—this time with monkeys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/06/02/reality-check-the-state-of-biotech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>531</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
