<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Base &#187; incentives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/tag/incentives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase</link>
	<description>A blog about science, politics, and how to let each help the other without compromising them both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Carrots Might Work Better Than Sticks (Plus They&#8217;re Low in Calories)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/08/28/carrots-might-work-better-than-sticks-plus-theyre-low-in-calories/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/08/28/carrots-might-work-better-than-sticks-plus-theyre-low-in-calories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition & Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/08/28/carrots-might-work-better-than-sticks-plus-theyre-low-in-calories/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Theories on fighting the obesity epidemic can be divided into two camps: punishing or restricting bad behavior (like oh, say, banning new fast food restaurants in poorer neighborhoods) and rewarding good behavior. So far, the bulk of what&#8217;s actually been done falls in the first category. Arguably, the most effective options would lie somewhere in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/widget/?wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=67cc06de-58af-40be-9e8e-7c994abde46a" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Theories on fighting the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/category/nutrition-obesity/">obesity epidemic</a> can be divided into two camps: punishing or restricting bad behavior (like oh, say, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/15/legislating-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/">banning new fast food restaurants</a> in poorer neighborhoods) and rewarding good behavior. So far, the bulk of what&#8217;s actually been done falls in the first category. Arguably, the most effective options would lie somewhere in the second.</p>
<p>Enter a <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/08/21/america/NA-US-Obesity-Penalty.php" target="_blank">new law enacted in Alabama</a>, in which state employees who are obese or who have high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or high glucose will have to pay $25 a month more in health insurance if they don&#8217;t lose weight and get healthy by 2010. True to form, the law punishes the chronically obese with financial penalties—exactly as it has punished smokers, who&#8217;ve been paying a $24 surcharge for their habit. The state isn&#8217;t leaving it all to the employees; state officials say they&#8217;ll offer programs such as Weight Watchers and gym discounts to help people drop pounds and avoid the penalty.</p>
<p><span id="more-201"></span>Alabama has the second highest obesity rate in the country—<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/08/19/whos-the-fattest-of-them-all-obesity-rates-rise-in-37-states/">the big winner being its neighbor, Mississippi</a>. The Sweet Home state employs over 37,000 people, meaning that statistically, around 12,000 of them are obese. While just about every health policy expert (and the majority of employees) will say that positive incentives are better motivators than punishments, the one thing we&#8217;re really lacking is hard data. Maybe a year or two of numbers from Alabama&#8217;s state employee roster could settle the debate once and for all—or at least give us a clue as to whether economic incentives are useful in the slightest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/08/28/carrots-might-work-better-than-sticks-plus-theyre-low-in-calories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislating Obesity: South L.A. to Ban Fast Food Joints?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/15/legislating-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/15/legislating-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition & Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/15/legislating-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The era of government regulation on calorie consumption has begun, and nowhere is it playing out more clearly than in California. The state legislature has proposed a trans fat ban in restaurants (a rule that&#8217;s already in place in New York City) and now Los Angeles Councilwoman Jan Perry is proposing a moratorium on new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/07/burger.JPG" alt="hamburger" align="left" />The era of government regulation on calorie consumption has begun, and nowhere is it playing out more clearly than in California. The state legislature has <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/1082742.html" target="_blank">proposed a trans fat ban in restaurants</a> (a rule that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16051436/" target="_blank">already in place</a> in New York City) and now Los Angeles Councilwoman Jan Perry is <a href="http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/index.php?cl=8822629" target="_blank">proposing a moratorium on new fast food</a> restaurants in South L.A. The ban is based on research indicating that 45 percent of the restaurants in South L.A. are of the fast food variety, compared to 16 percent in West L.A.; plus child obesity rates in South L.A. are 29 percent, compared with 23 percent nationwide.</p>
<p>The racial and socioeconomic politics here are obvious—KFC-laden South L.A. is predominantly African American and Latino, while the vegan/organic wonderland of West L.A. is home to a highly affluent (and mostly white) population.</p>
<p>Critics raise the obvious, and valid, <a href="http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food/dishing/2008/07/the_soft_bigotr.html" target="_blank">point about incentives</a>—rather than punishing restaurants for serving unhealthy food, shouldn&#8217;t we be offering economic incentives for health food stores and salad bars to open in South L.A.? Simply keeping a new Burger King out does nothing to provide South L.A. residents with healthier and more nutritious food options. As one busy mother interviewed for the piece said, &#8220;There&#8217;s never any place you can go over here to buy &#8230; organic food. There&#8217;s no Trader Joe&#8217;s over here.&#8221; That pretty much sums it up right there.</p>
<p><em>Image: iStockPhoto </em></p>
<p><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/widget/?wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=67cc06de-58af-40be-9e8e-7c994abde46a" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/15/legislating-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1107</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
