<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Base &#187; UFO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/tag/ufo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase</link>
	<description>A blog about science, politics, and how to let each help the other without compromising them both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Forget Al-Qaeda; Apparently It&#8217;s the Aliens We Need to Worry About</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/30/forget-al-qaeda-apparently-its-the-aliens-we-need-to-worry-about/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/30/forget-al-qaeda-apparently-its-the-aliens-we-need-to-worry-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Lafsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Goes to Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science in Wartime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/30/forget-al-qaeda-apparently-its-the-aliens-we-need-to-worry-about/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the U.S. military&#8217;s overdependence on radar and indifference to UFOs a weakness that could be exploited by terrorists? That&#8217;s what the New York Times is claiming in an op-ed by Nick Pope, author of Open Skies, Closed Minds and the former head of UFO investigations for the British Ministry of Defense. Pope argues that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/files/2008/07/ufo.JPG" alt="UFO" align="left" />Is the U.S. military&#8217;s overdependence on radar and indifference to UFOs a weakness that could be exploited by terrorists? That&#8217;s what the <em>New York Times</em> is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29pope.html?scp=1&amp;sq=UFO&amp;st=cse" target="_blank">claiming in an op-ed</a> by Nick Pope, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Open-Skies-Closed-Minds-Nick/dp/0440234891/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1217430044&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank"><em>Open Skies, Closed Minds</em></a> and the former head of UFO investigations for the British Ministry of Defense. Pope argues that NASA and the Air Force are ignoring potential national security threats by not investigating &#8220;UFO phenomena&#8221; such as a cigar-shaped craft that was reportedly sighted near  the Channel Islands in 2007.</p>
<p>While he doesn&#8217;t explicitly say that these unexplained aircraft are of the invaders-from-another-planet variety, Pope claims that our skepticism towards anything &#8220;below the radar&#8221; makes us vulnerable to attack from human-made flying objects with which we&#8217;re unfamiliar (like oh, say, the secret invisible bombers that Al-Qaeda could be building in the Tora Bora caves?)</p>
<p>That the <em>Times</em> is suddenly handing the microphone to an avowed UFO believer seems a bit odd, particularly when you examine Pope&#8217;s history. Here&#8217;s a review from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/1000027801" target="_blank">Booklist</a> of <em>Open Skies</em>, which was a best-seller in the U.K.:</p>
<blockquote><p>If Pope is correct, Earth is currently in the middle of an interplanetary war. He claims that while he was stationed at the &#8220;UFO Desk&#8221; of Britain&#8217;s Ministry of Defense, he studied UFO sightings as well as crop circles and cattle mutilations—all of which led him to the conclusion that the aliens are here, and they aren&#8217;t friendly. He believes it is time the British government and the world in general rally to confront the invaders. The author openly compares himself to Fox Mulder of TV&#8217;s <em>X-Files</em> in his struggles to bring forth the hidden evidence of the security danger to planet Earth&#8230; Although numerous incidents are cited, actual evidence is lacking, and logic is often absent from the author&#8217;s arguments.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not exactly hard proof of anything other than the fact that Pope is good at spinning a narrative to win publicity. As fellow DISCOVER blogger Phil Plait <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/26/ed-mitchell-going-to-the-moon-doesnt-mean-youre-right/" target="_blank">put it</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-143"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>It doesn’t matter who believes in aliens. What matters is — hello! — <em>evidence</em>.</p>
<p>Show me the clear pictures. Sh[ow] me to nonterrestrial-isotope-laden artifacts. Show me a frakkin’ flying saucer sitting on the White House lawn.</p>
<p>Show me <em>anything</em> other than blurry pictures and videos, eyewitness testimony, and black-out government documents.</p></blockquote>
<p>Before we start diverting billions of <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jzmiF42GtsVMqoFqRdkshmthmoeAD9286USG2" target="_blank">already-stretched</a> government dollars into an anti-UFO military program, it seems like a good idea to stick to Phil&#8217;s advice.</p>
<p><em>Image: iStockPhoto</em></p>
<p><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/widget/?wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=67cc06de-58af-40be-9e8e-7c994abde46a" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/30/forget-al-qaeda-apparently-its-the-aliens-we-need-to-worry-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
