Is a new ‘nanodote’ the next big thing in snakebite treatment? Not yet.

By Christie Wilcox | March 13, 2017 8:00 am
UCI chemistry professor Ken Shea (right) and doctoral student Jeffrey O’Brien have developed a potential new broad-spectrum snake venom antidote. Photo credit: Steve Zylius / UCI

UCI chemistry professor Ken Shea (right) and doctoral student Jeffrey O’Brien (left) have developed a potential new broad-spectrum snake venom antidote. Photo credit: Steve Zylius / UCI

Living in countries like the U.S., Australia, and the U.K., it can be all too easy to forget that snakebites are a serious and neglected global medical problem. It’s estimated that upwards of 4.5 million people are envenomated by snakes every year; about half of them suffer serious injuries including loss of limbs, and more than 100,000 die from such bites.

Much of this morbidity and mortality could be prevented if faster, easier access to the therapeutics that target and inactivate snake venom toxins could be established. But effective antivenoms are difficult to produce, expensive, and usually require storage and handling measures such as refrigeration that simply aren’t possible in the rural, remote areas where venomous snakes take their toll. Seeking to solve many of the issues, a new wave of researchers have begun the search for alternatives, hoping to find stable, cheap, and effective broad-spectrum antidotes to snake venom toxins. One such group at the University of California Irvine recently announced a promising new candidate: a nanogel that can neutralize one of the most dangerous families of protein toxins found in snake venoms.

In a press release published last week, the scientific team—led by chemistry professor Ken Shea—drew attention to their most recent paper unveiling the new possible therapeutic, which was published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society in December with Shea’s Ph.D. student, Jeffrey O’Brien, as lead author. The team dubbed the polymer nanogel material, which consists of readily available acrylamide derivates, a “nanodote.”

To find the right cocktail of nanogel components, the researchers pitted chemical formulations against one of the most toxic protein families found in snake venoms: phospholipase A2s, or PLA2s for short. PLA2s are enzymes which generally cut phospholipids (the fatty molecules which make up cellular membranes), and are essential for the daily functioning of our bodies. But through accelerated evolution, snakes have transformed these helpful enzymes into potent toxins with a wide diversity of sinister effects. Because of their abundance in the venoms of the three major venomous families of snakes, PLA2s are a natural target for any hopeful broad-spectrum snakebite treatment.

When the UCI researchers tested potential nanogel formulations against a suite of snake venom PLA2s, they found one that was able to sequester and neutralize the toxins from multiple snakes, preventing the toxins from killing human red blood cells (for you chemistry nerds: the nanogel chosen consists of 20% acrylic acid, 40% N-phenylacrylamide, 38% N-isopropylacrylamide, and 2% N,N′-methylenebis(acrylamide)). They then further tweaked the relative amounts of the four constituents to also inhibit bee venom’s main PLA2, melittin, resulting in a formula able to protect blood cells in concentrations as low as 63 μg/mL. Once optimized, they also tested the new formula for safety against a cultured human cell line, finding no evidence of cytotoxicity.

Then, it was time to put their nanodote to a much stiffer test: could it selectively inhibit snake venom PLA2s in human serum? After all, as soon as venom enters the body, it is diluted into the blood stream, so any potential treatment for snakebites has to be able to selectively target toxins, leaving the rest of the proteins in the blood alone. So, the researchers added the nanodote to human serum and looked to see if it bound serum proteins. Good news: it didn’t. They then added snake venom PLA2 from the Mozambique spitting cobra (Naja mossambica). The nanodote did bind those toxins, all the while leaving the human serum proteins alone.

“Current anti-venom is very specific to certain snake types. Ours seems to show broad-spectrum ability to stop cell destruction across species on many continents, and that is quite a big deal,” said O’Brien in the press release. But most importantly, “our treatment costs pennies on the dollar and, unlike the current one, requires no refrigeration.”

But while the results presented so far are promising, much more research is needed into how well the nanodote works in living creatures. Preventing red blood cell lysis from venom PLA2s in a laboratory setting is a great start, but it’s the bare minimum for proof of concept. The researchers need to demonstrate that the gel can effectively work against a diversity of venom toxins and in living, envenomated animals before even considering it a possible therapeutic for humans. And as anyone involved in drug development will tell you, there’s a big difference between a compound that works in a test tube and one that is effective, cheap enough to produce, and safe for use in people.

Of course, it’ll cost a pretty penny to move the nanodote from the lab bench to clinical trials and eventually to market. It costs an average of $2.6 billion dollars (and more than a decade of work!) to turn a promising compound into a pharmaceutical. So it’s not surprising that the researchers specifically make note of their hunt for private and public funding to continue research and development in the press release. “We have more work to do, and this is why we’re seeking a fairly significant infusion of resources,” senior author Ken Shea stated. It remains to be seen whether the lab will find those resources, and if they do, whether the nanodote can live up to the high hopes of the research team (as with all potential revolutionary treatments, it’s important to keep mind that only about half of reported medical breakthroughs actually hold up to further scrutiny). On behalf of the millions suffering from snakebites worldwide, let’s keep our fingers crossed.

 

Citation: O’Brien, Jeffrey, et al. “Engineering the protein corona of a synthetic polymer nanoparticle for broad-spectrum sequestration and neutralization of venomous biomacromolecules.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138 (51), pp 16604–16607. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b10950

ADVERTISEMENT
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    Third World morbidity is a vast planetary asset; It should be encouraged in all its aspects. Would you add 500 lbs of scrap iron to your trunk to boost your car’s performance?

  • donald-wright@mail.ru

    I’ve profited 104 thousand dollars in last twelve months by freelancing online a­­n­­d I did it by wo­rking part-time f­­o­­r few h /day. I used an earning opportunity I found on-line and I am so amazed that I was able to earn so much extra income. It’s so newbie friendly a­­n­­d I’m just so grateful that i discovered it. Here is what i did… http://urlof­.­site/wQ3Gp

  • robin.trimble

    I got paid 104000 dollars last year by freelancing from my house a­­n­­d I did it by wo­rking part time f­o­r few hrs each day. I was following a business opportunity I was introduced by this company i found online and I am amazed that i was able to make such great money. It’s really user-friendly and I’m so happy that i found this. Check out what I did… http://gee­.­su/BAULR

  • gonzalez.aaron

    I was paid 104,000 bucks in last 12 months by freelancing from my house and I did that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g in my own time f­­o­­r 3+ h each day. I was following a business model I stumbled upon online and I am happy that i earned so much extra income. It’s really beginner friendly a­n­d I am just so thankful that i discovered this. This is what i did… http://www.wzurl­.­me/tPSR1w

  • womack.debbie@mail.ru

    I have profited $104k in last twelve months by working online and I did it by wor­king part time f­­o­­r 3+ hours /daily. I was following a business model I stumbled upon from this website i found online and I am amazed that i earned so much money. It’s so user friendly a­n­d I’m so happy that i found this. Check out what I did… http://libr­.­ae/39Lj

  • ilene.luz

    I was paid 104000 dollars past year by doing a web based work and consequently I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours everyday. I tried job opportunity I stumbled upon on the web and so I am thrilled that I was in the position to make such great money. It is undoubtedly newbie-friendly and therefore I’m so pleased that I found out regarding it. Go and visit exactly what I do… http://secure10­.­weebly­.­com

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Science Sushi

Real Science. Served Raw.

About Christie Wilcox

Dr. Christie Wilcox is a science writer and postdoctoral scholar at the University of Hawaii. She freelances for major media outlets including The New York Times and Popular Science. Her debut book, Venomous, releases August 2016 (Scientific American/FSG Books). To learn more about her life and work, check out her webpage or follow her on Twitter, Google+, or Facebook.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

@NerdyChristie on Twitter

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+