<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inception: Rarely Is Getting Your Mind So Messed With So Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/</link>
	<description>The science of futurist technologies—and an excuse to soak in sci-fi TV shows, books, movies, toys, and video games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-13000</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1357#comment-13000</guid>
		<description>fortunately, inception is not a documentary, it&#039;s a movie, and it is supposed to be entertaining, and it is... I loved it.  And it&#039;s the type of movie that allows you to walk  out of the theather and engage in interesting discussions with your friends and family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fortunately, inception is not a documentary, it&#8217;s a movie, and it is supposed to be entertaining, and it is&#8230; I loved it.  And it&#8217;s the type of movie that allows you to walk  out of the theather and engage in interesting discussions with your friends and family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol Ascendans - The Website of Alex Sumner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-11717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol Ascendans - The Website of Alex Sumner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1357#comment-11717</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Inception &#8211; An Initiated&#160;Review...&lt;/strong&gt;

Inception, starring Leonardo Di Caprio and written &amp; directed by Christopher Nolan, is an interesting examination of the world of dreaming and telepathy.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Inception &#8211; An Initiated&nbsp;Review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Inception, starring Leonardo Di Caprio and written &amp; directed by Christopher Nolan, is an interesting examination of the world of dreaming and telepathy&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notharctus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-11425</link>
		<dc:creator>Notharctus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1357#comment-11425</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen Inception, but everything I have seen about it - trailers, unofficial guides, reviews, spoiler descriptions - tells me that it is absolute rubbish top to bottom in terms of actual dreams, the unconscious, psychology, and neurophysiology.  It is totally bogus as neuroscience.  The way dream levels interact with each other, the precise differential passage of time on levels (you can spend weeks, months, and years in a dream state?  Does neuronal activity speed up to allow that?  Impossible.), kicking up to higher levels, physics mirroring the real world (the excuse is that the architect is designing the dreams - is she designing physics too?).  

And it is one of the least imaginative portrayals of the unconscious ever put on film.  Nolan doesn&#039;t seem to understand the difference between the unconscious and virtual reality.

What Inception is really about is a set of arbitrary rules for Michael Bay/James Bond capers - rules that keep getting elaborated during the copious exposition in the film.  Just like, as the blogger at Cultural Minefield put it, a game of Calvinball (Calvin and Hobbes&#039; game in which rules kept being made up during play).  And the subplot is Solaris all over again.   Or maybe Inception is a coincidental sequel to Shutter Island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen Inception, but everything I have seen about it &#8211; trailers, unofficial guides, reviews, spoiler descriptions &#8211; tells me that it is absolute rubbish top to bottom in terms of actual dreams, the unconscious, psychology, and neurophysiology.  It is totally bogus as neuroscience.  The way dream levels interact with each other, the precise differential passage of time on levels (you can spend weeks, months, and years in a dream state?  Does neuronal activity speed up to allow that?  Impossible.), kicking up to higher levels, physics mirroring the real world (the excuse is that the architect is designing the dreams &#8211; is she designing physics too?).  </p>
<p>And it is one of the least imaginative portrayals of the unconscious ever put on film.  Nolan doesn&#8217;t seem to understand the difference between the unconscious and virtual reality.</p>
<p>What Inception is really about is a set of arbitrary rules for Michael Bay/James Bond capers &#8211; rules that keep getting elaborated during the copious exposition in the film.  Just like, as the blogger at Cultural Minefield put it, a game of Calvinball (Calvin and Hobbes&#8217; game in which rules kept being made up during play).  And the subplot is Solaris all over again.   Or maybe Inception is a coincidental sequel to Shutter Island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ntom levineo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/07/16/inception-rarely-is-getting-your-mind-so-messed-with-so-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-11373</link>
		<dc:creator>ntom levineo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1357#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>If they tried to break into The Batman&#039;s dreams, Inception would have been called Watch Leonardo DiCaprio Get Beat into a Coma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they tried to break into The Batman&#8217;s dreams, Inception would have been called Watch Leonardo DiCaprio Get Beat into a Coma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-26 18:03:50 -->
