<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sci-Fi Explanation of Why Gay People Must Be Allowed to Marry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#60;title&#62; When will we be transhuman? &#60;/title&#62;.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>&#60;title&#62; When will we be transhuman? &#60;/title&#62;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>[...] Persons, not People: Rights discourse will shift to personhood instead of common humanity. I have argued we’re already beginning to see a social shift towards [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Persons, not People: Rights discourse will shift to personhood instead of common humanity. I have argued we’re already beginning to see a social shift towards [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girls escorts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>girls escorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 05:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>I was suggested this website by my cousin. I&#039;m now not positive whether or not this publish is written by him as no one else know such detailed approximately my difficulty. You&#039;re amazing! Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suggested this website by my cousin. I&#8217;m now not positive whether or not this publish is written by him as no one else know such detailed approximately my difficulty. You&#8217;re amazing! Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Teramis Christian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Teramis Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>I agree with your notion of personhood being the basis for rights.  As a science fiction novelist, that concept is implicit in the marriage laws (including same sex marriages) in my Sa&#039;adani Empire science fiction setting (recently blogged about gay marriage in that context &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deborahteramischristian.com/world-design/gay-marriage-in-saadani-space/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;here&lt;/b&gt;).&lt;/a&gt;  To my thinking the other key element is the consent which you mention. If two persons consent to something, let them partner however they like.

Thanks too for the interesting outtake from &lt;i&gt;Citizen Cyborg&lt;/i&gt;. I&#039;m not familiar with that but now I want to give it a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your notion of personhood being the basis for rights.  As a science fiction novelist, that concept is implicit in the marriage laws (including same sex marriages) in my Sa&#8217;adani Empire science fiction setting (recently blogged about gay marriage in that context <a href="http://www.deborahteramischristian.com/world-design/gay-marriage-in-saadani-space/" rel="nofollow"><b>here</b>).</a>  To my thinking the other key element is the consent which you mention. If two persons consent to something, let them partner however they like.</p>
<p>Thanks too for the interesting outtake from <i>Citizen Cyborg</i>. I&#8217;m not familiar with that but now I want to give it a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deryl Fisher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Deryl Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 03:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>So how about us Neanderthals?  Are we human?  Even the gay Neanderthals amongst us? I found my way to this page while looking for something else (which is my usual route where being educated is concerned.)  I saw a Discover Magazine in a library in Wisconsin last week.  On the front it said something to the effect that we aren&#039;t even human.  and tossed in something about 3% Neanderthal and another ingredient (immigrant?) that I didn&#039;t recognize.  And before I could get to the article my ride came.  I&#039;m back where it doesn&#039;t snow in April.  And looking on this website I was trying to locate that article when I met this one.  Can anyone plug me into the one about my Neanderthal ancestry?
About Gayness and procreating the &quot;gayest&quot; person I knew had 4 children by 3 different women before he died at the age of 44 from AIDS.  He almost always had 2 or more gay lovers in his home.
Thanks
Der Fish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how about us Neanderthals?  Are we human?  Even the gay Neanderthals amongst us? I found my way to this page while looking for something else (which is my usual route where being educated is concerned.)  I saw a Discover Magazine in a library in Wisconsin last week.  On the front it said something to the effect that we aren&#8217;t even human.  and tossed in something about 3% Neanderthal and another ingredient (immigrant?) that I didn&#8217;t recognize.  And before I could get to the article my ride came.  I&#8217;m back where it doesn&#8217;t snow in April.  And looking on this website I was trying to locate that article when I met this one.  Can anyone plug me into the one about my Neanderthal ancestry?<br />
About Gayness and procreating the &#8220;gayest&#8221; person I knew had 4 children by 3 different women before he died at the age of 44 from AIDS.  He almost always had 2 or more gay lovers in his home.<br />
Thanks<br />
Der Fish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barrie escorts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>barrie escorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>But a smiling visitor   here to share the love (:, btw  outstanding design .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But a smiling visitor   here to share the love (:, btw  outstanding design .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zephyram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Zephyram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>@30
Your statement implies we are not part of the animal kingdom. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@30<br />
Your statement implies we are not part of the animal kingdom. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenotransplants Might Wipe Out the Human Race &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Dog Eared Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenotransplants Might Wipe Out the Human Race &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Dog Eared Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>[...] transhumanists. She thinks that  personhood is the “world’s most dangerous idea,” (sounds vaguely familiar) because if aliens, animals and robots have rights too, we won’t value humans anymore. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] transhumanists. She thinks that  personhood is the “world’s most dangerous idea,” (sounds vaguely familiar) because if aliens, animals and robots have rights too, we won’t value humans anymore. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sci-Fi Explanation of Why Gay People Must Be Allowed to Marry &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Discover Magazine &#171; The Weal Reel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sci-Fi Explanation of Why Gay People Must Be Allowed to Marry &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Discover Magazine &#171; The Weal Reel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>[...] - Excerpt from The Sci-Fi Explanation of Why Gay People Must Be Allowed to Marry &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Discover M... [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Excerpt from The Sci-Fi Explanation of Why Gay People Must Be Allowed to Marry | Science Not Fiction | Discover M&#8230; [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainbow Federation: The 5 Most Diverse Crews in Space &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; FEEDER</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainbow Federation: The 5 Most Diverse Crews in Space &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; FEEDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>[...] Once or twice before I&#8217;ve made a case for diversity as a hallmark of good science fiction. Regardless of one&#8217;s present political affiliations, we like our sci-fi casts to be a plurality of uncanny and unfamiliar characters. The future of our species is, in part, dependent upon how well we get along with other forms of sentient life. So which stellar explorers would earn the stamp of approval from the Rainbow Coalition of the 24½th Century? After weeding out (most) all-human crews (sorry BSG!) and some of the less well-known teams (sorry Bucky O&#8217;Hare!), I&#8217;ve come up with a top five list. We&#8217;ve got genetic mutants, alcoholic robots, holograms, bisexual aliens, snarky A.I., clones, cryonauts, cyborgs, and every variant of human being imaginable. Did I leave anyone out? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Once or twice before I&#8217;ve made a case for diversity as a hallmark of good science fiction. Regardless of one&#8217;s present political affiliations, we like our sci-fi casts to be a plurality of uncanny and unfamiliar characters. The future of our species is, in part, dependent upon how well we get along with other forms of sentient life. So which stellar explorers would earn the stamp of approval from the Rainbow Coalition of the 24½th Century? After weeding out (most) all-human crews (sorry BSG!) and some of the less well-known teams (sorry Bucky O&#8217;Hare!), I&#8217;ve come up with a top five list. We&#8217;ve got genetic mutants, alcoholic robots, holograms, bisexual aliens, snarky A.I., clones, cryonauts, cyborgs, and every variant of human being imaginable. Did I leave anyone out? [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainbow Federation: The 5 Most Diverse Crews in Space &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/08/05/sci-fis-explanation-of-why-gay-people-must-be-allowed-to-marry/#comment-2951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainbow Federation: The 5 Most Diverse Crews in Space &#124; Science Not Fiction &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=1568#comment-2951</guid>
		<description>[...] Once or twice before I&#8217;ve made a case for diversity as a hallmark of good science fiction. Regardless of one&#8217;s present political affiliations, we like our sci-fi casts to be a plurality of uncanny and unfamiliar characters. The future of our species is, in part, dependent upon how well we get along with other forms of sentient life. So which stellar explorers would earn the stamp of approval from the Rainbow Coalition of the 24½th Century? After weeding out (most) all-human crews (sorry BSG!) and some of the less well-known teams (sorry Bucky O&#8217;Hare!), I&#8217;ve come up with a top five list. We&#8217;ve got genetic mutants, alcoholic robots, holograms, bisexual aliens, snarky A.I., clones, cryonauts, cyborgs, and every variant of human being imaginable. Did I leave anyone out? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Once or twice before I&#8217;ve made a case for diversity as a hallmark of good science fiction. Regardless of one&#8217;s present political affiliations, we like our sci-fi casts to be a plurality of uncanny and unfamiliar characters. The future of our species is, in part, dependent upon how well we get along with other forms of sentient life. So which stellar explorers would earn the stamp of approval from the Rainbow Coalition of the 24½th Century? After weeding out (most) all-human crews (sorry BSG!) and some of the less well-known teams (sorry Bucky O&#8217;Hare!), I&#8217;ve come up with a top five list. We&#8217;ve got genetic mutants, alcoholic robots, holograms, bisexual aliens, snarky A.I., clones, cryonauts, cyborgs, and every variant of human being imaginable. Did I leave anyone out? [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
