What the tools are used for determines the morality of humans, and whether they are used for progress, or destruction, used for all, or simply hoarded for self enrichment.

Mankind living without purpose reduces mankind to an extinguishable species because of, and in anticipation of the consequences that follow. Dignity can derive from few perceptions of excellence that follows that purpose like the tail mankind lost along the way. It is meant to be the invisible appendage it is.

If mankind is dumb enough to get in its own way to recycle profits for cash flow rather than to commit himself to progress, why should mankind have any faith in mankind, much less the flawed God who may have devised such a plan.

If flaws occurred in manufacturing of rockets at the rate they occur in products to be sold, including autos that rely upon safety and efficiency, mankind would not yet be to the moon, nor would it be safe to go there.

Human responsibility for each other ordinarily requires a plan, and that plan must be all inclusive, or it becomes a discriminatory plan, meant to serve the few, not the many. But in safety and efficiency, all men are equal in that those traits are generally not divisible for haves and have nots. Logical consequence suggests that mankind rises together or spins itself into oblivion and extinction. That is is a choice of humans, and governments alike is obvious.

That the choice for success through progress and prosperity hasn’t been yet made by humans is one of the most determinate aspects of their frailty, and their flaw, whether developed by evolution, or by God.

@Booperkit & Brian Too: Thanks! If I get you thinking, I’ve succeeded.

also: HI REDDIT – SEND ME YOUR THOUGHTS

This article makes me think that, far from being a future possibility, technological based evolution is already happening. In fact it’s ancient and far predates the Industrial Revolution, the Enlightenment, and all of science. Thought provoking indeed.