Comments on: It’s Not the Heat, It’s the Humidity: Electricity From Air

By: www.myeasypayment.com

www.myeasypayment.com — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:58:09 +0000

Funds 1 automobile loan terms include 30, 60 and seventy two months. Capital One particular, in contrast to other corporations I have carried out small business with is completely rigid with regards to adjusting there charges. Even when the enormous costs are resulting from all of your tiny hidden fees they have. Capital 1 Monetary can also be involved with instalment lending, healthcare financing, and little business lending activities.

By: Zaposlitev

Zaposlitev — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:12:34 +0000

kgwceyzelpvbosirmstk, delo, KqJnFJT.

By: Jeremiah Matlick

Jeremiah Matlick — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:11:19 +0000

Good ideas.

By: Georg

Georg — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:06:38 +0000

Hello MT-La.This is what I mean:
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-08/hygroelectricity-could-enable-devices-pull-electricity-out-thin-air
a blog referring to the same original. There is the ominous
phosphate and silica.
Meanwhile I found the original paper and started to to study it.
Still I am wondering, wheter they violate first LOT or not.
The charges seem to be very small, it is not easy to rule out
chemical action (= dissolution) of the metal sheets.
Georg

By: melyndaphilpott

melyndaphilpott — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:10:17 +0000

Maybe the fact that we feel ‘drained’ when in the midst of an extreme humidity wave could go some way to helping us understand how to drain current from a charge collector. I know that I can’t go across a Wal-mart parking lot in Arkansas during the summer without having to a) take a shower (sweat the current out maybe?) and b) needing a nap.

By: MT-LA

MT-LA — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:27:39 +0000

@Georg: “I’d like to read the original, because I think this is at
least partly produced by a consecution of erronous “reportings”.”
So, why dont you read the original? The link to the actual study is available in the second paragraph. And no, it’s not a blog(!). Or perhaps you prefer to make assumptions and then spout off as if you’re some kind of expert on the matter.
Considering the paper is on the American Chemical Society’s website (ACS), I’m willing to believe that the authors have some basis in reality. Furthermore, from what I remember about physics, if you can create a voltage difference between two conductors, then you have a means of generating electricity. The amount of electricity generated is then a matter of efficiency and scale.

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:24:36 +0000

pdf

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/la102494k

By: Georg

Georg — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:19:59 +0000

Hello,
this is something appropriate for 1st of April!
The blog (!) cited speaks of aluminium phosphate
and silica “common” in atmosphere, which I
doubt, and the use of a Faraday cage is typical
for electrostatic experiments, as
the micŕoscopic amount of charge is only collected
once.
There is no explanation of how to drain current
from the gadget.
Maybe this things play a role in genesis of lightnings,
but as a source of electric power it is nonsense.
I’d like to read the original, because I think this is at
least partly produced by a consecution of erronous
“reportings”.
Georg